Radial dyssynchrony assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in relation to left ventricular function, myocardial scarring and QRS duration in patients with heart failure

Paul W. X. Foley, Kayvan Khadjooi, Joseph A. Ward, Russell E. A. Smith, Berthold Stegemann, Michael Frenneaux, Francisco Leyva

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Intuitively, cardiac dyssynchrony is the inevitable result of myocardial injury. We hypothezised that radial dyssynchrony reflects left ventricular remodeling, myocardial scarring, QRS duration and impaired LV function and that, accordingly, it is detectable in all patients with heart failure.

Methods: 225 patients with heart failure, grouped according to QRS duration of < 120 ms (A, n = 75), between 120-149 ms (B, n = 75) or >= 150 ms (C, n = 75), and 50 healthy controls underwent assessment of radial dyssynchrony using the cardiovascular magnetic resonance tissue synchronization index (CMR-TSI = SD of time to peak inward endocardial motion in up to 60 myocardial segments).

Results: Compared to 50 healthy controls (21.8 +/- 6.3 ms [mean +/- SD]), CMR-TSI was higher in A (74.8 +/- 34.6 ms), B (92.4 +/- 39.5 ms) and C (104.6 +/- 45.6 ms) (all p < 0.0001). Adopting a cut-off CMR-TSI of 34.4 ms (21.8 plus 2xSD for controls) for the definition of dyssynchrony, it was present in 91% in A, 95% in B and 99% in C. Amongst patients in NYHA class III or IV, with a LVEF<35% and a QRS> 120 ms, 99% had dyssynchrony. Amongst those with a QRS< 120 ms, 91% had dyssynchrony. Across the study sample, CMR-TSI was related positively to left ventricular volumes (p < 0.0001) and inversely to LVEF (CMR-TSI = 178.3 e ((-0.033 LVEF)) ms, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: Radial dyssynchrony is almost universal in patients with heart failure. This vies against the notion that a lack of response to CRT is related to a lack of dyssynchrony.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages50
JournalJournal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Volume11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Nov 2009

Keywords

  • cardiac-resynchronization therapy
  • narrow QRS
  • intraventricular dyssynchrony
  • mechanical dyssynchrony
  • dilated cardiomyopathy
  • asynchrony
  • prevalence
  • morbidity
  • complexes
  • prognosis

Cite this

Radial dyssynchrony assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in relation to left ventricular function, myocardial scarring and QRS duration in patients with heart failure. / Foley, Paul W. X.; Khadjooi, Kayvan; Ward, Joseph A. ; Smith, Russell E. A.; Stegemann, Berthold; Frenneaux, Michael; Leyva, Francisco.

In: Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Vol. 11, 24.11.2009.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Foley, Paul W. X. ; Khadjooi, Kayvan ; Ward, Joseph A. ; Smith, Russell E. A. ; Stegemann, Berthold ; Frenneaux, Michael ; Leyva, Francisco. / Radial dyssynchrony assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in relation to left ventricular function, myocardial scarring and QRS duration in patients with heart failure. In: Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. 2009 ; Vol. 11.
@article{c0f2c6b708b148cbba929e4f069abe95,
title = "Radial dyssynchrony assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in relation to left ventricular function, myocardial scarring and QRS duration in patients with heart failure",
abstract = "Background: Intuitively, cardiac dyssynchrony is the inevitable result of myocardial injury. We hypothezised that radial dyssynchrony reflects left ventricular remodeling, myocardial scarring, QRS duration and impaired LV function and that, accordingly, it is detectable in all patients with heart failure.Methods: 225 patients with heart failure, grouped according to QRS duration of < 120 ms (A, n = 75), between 120-149 ms (B, n = 75) or >= 150 ms (C, n = 75), and 50 healthy controls underwent assessment of radial dyssynchrony using the cardiovascular magnetic resonance tissue synchronization index (CMR-TSI = SD of time to peak inward endocardial motion in up to 60 myocardial segments).Results: Compared to 50 healthy controls (21.8 +/- 6.3 ms [mean +/- SD]), CMR-TSI was higher in A (74.8 +/- 34.6 ms), B (92.4 +/- 39.5 ms) and C (104.6 +/- 45.6 ms) (all p < 0.0001). Adopting a cut-off CMR-TSI of 34.4 ms (21.8 plus 2xSD for controls) for the definition of dyssynchrony, it was present in 91{\%} in A, 95{\%} in B and 99{\%} in C. Amongst patients in NYHA class III or IV, with a LVEF<35{\%} and a QRS> 120 ms, 99{\%} had dyssynchrony. Amongst those with a QRS< 120 ms, 91{\%} had dyssynchrony. Across the study sample, CMR-TSI was related positively to left ventricular volumes (p < 0.0001) and inversely to LVEF (CMR-TSI = 178.3 e ((-0.033 LVEF)) ms, p < 0.0001).Conclusion: Radial dyssynchrony is almost universal in patients with heart failure. This vies against the notion that a lack of response to CRT is related to a lack of dyssynchrony.",
keywords = "cardiac-resynchronization therapy, narrow QRS, intraventricular dyssynchrony, mechanical dyssynchrony, dilated cardiomyopathy, asynchrony, prevalence, morbidity, complexes, prognosis",
author = "Foley, {Paul W. X.} and Kayvan Khadjooi and Ward, {Joseph A.} and Smith, {Russell E. A.} and Berthold Stegemann and Michael Frenneaux and Francisco Leyva",
year = "2009",
month = "11",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1186/1532-429X-11-50",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance",
issn = "1097-6647",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Radial dyssynchrony assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in relation to left ventricular function, myocardial scarring and QRS duration in patients with heart failure

AU - Foley, Paul W. X.

AU - Khadjooi, Kayvan

AU - Ward, Joseph A.

AU - Smith, Russell E. A.

AU - Stegemann, Berthold

AU - Frenneaux, Michael

AU - Leyva, Francisco

PY - 2009/11/24

Y1 - 2009/11/24

N2 - Background: Intuitively, cardiac dyssynchrony is the inevitable result of myocardial injury. We hypothezised that radial dyssynchrony reflects left ventricular remodeling, myocardial scarring, QRS duration and impaired LV function and that, accordingly, it is detectable in all patients with heart failure.Methods: 225 patients with heart failure, grouped according to QRS duration of < 120 ms (A, n = 75), between 120-149 ms (B, n = 75) or >= 150 ms (C, n = 75), and 50 healthy controls underwent assessment of radial dyssynchrony using the cardiovascular magnetic resonance tissue synchronization index (CMR-TSI = SD of time to peak inward endocardial motion in up to 60 myocardial segments).Results: Compared to 50 healthy controls (21.8 +/- 6.3 ms [mean +/- SD]), CMR-TSI was higher in A (74.8 +/- 34.6 ms), B (92.4 +/- 39.5 ms) and C (104.6 +/- 45.6 ms) (all p < 0.0001). Adopting a cut-off CMR-TSI of 34.4 ms (21.8 plus 2xSD for controls) for the definition of dyssynchrony, it was present in 91% in A, 95% in B and 99% in C. Amongst patients in NYHA class III or IV, with a LVEF<35% and a QRS> 120 ms, 99% had dyssynchrony. Amongst those with a QRS< 120 ms, 91% had dyssynchrony. Across the study sample, CMR-TSI was related positively to left ventricular volumes (p < 0.0001) and inversely to LVEF (CMR-TSI = 178.3 e ((-0.033 LVEF)) ms, p < 0.0001).Conclusion: Radial dyssynchrony is almost universal in patients with heart failure. This vies against the notion that a lack of response to CRT is related to a lack of dyssynchrony.

AB - Background: Intuitively, cardiac dyssynchrony is the inevitable result of myocardial injury. We hypothezised that radial dyssynchrony reflects left ventricular remodeling, myocardial scarring, QRS duration and impaired LV function and that, accordingly, it is detectable in all patients with heart failure.Methods: 225 patients with heart failure, grouped according to QRS duration of < 120 ms (A, n = 75), between 120-149 ms (B, n = 75) or >= 150 ms (C, n = 75), and 50 healthy controls underwent assessment of radial dyssynchrony using the cardiovascular magnetic resonance tissue synchronization index (CMR-TSI = SD of time to peak inward endocardial motion in up to 60 myocardial segments).Results: Compared to 50 healthy controls (21.8 +/- 6.3 ms [mean +/- SD]), CMR-TSI was higher in A (74.8 +/- 34.6 ms), B (92.4 +/- 39.5 ms) and C (104.6 +/- 45.6 ms) (all p < 0.0001). Adopting a cut-off CMR-TSI of 34.4 ms (21.8 plus 2xSD for controls) for the definition of dyssynchrony, it was present in 91% in A, 95% in B and 99% in C. Amongst patients in NYHA class III or IV, with a LVEF<35% and a QRS> 120 ms, 99% had dyssynchrony. Amongst those with a QRS< 120 ms, 91% had dyssynchrony. Across the study sample, CMR-TSI was related positively to left ventricular volumes (p < 0.0001) and inversely to LVEF (CMR-TSI = 178.3 e ((-0.033 LVEF)) ms, p < 0.0001).Conclusion: Radial dyssynchrony is almost universal in patients with heart failure. This vies against the notion that a lack of response to CRT is related to a lack of dyssynchrony.

KW - cardiac-resynchronization therapy

KW - narrow QRS

KW - intraventricular dyssynchrony

KW - mechanical dyssynchrony

KW - dilated cardiomyopathy

KW - asynchrony

KW - prevalence

KW - morbidity

KW - complexes

KW - prognosis

U2 - 10.1186/1532-429X-11-50

DO - 10.1186/1532-429X-11-50

M3 - Article

VL - 11

JO - Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

JF - Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

SN - 1097-6647

ER -