Rapid Methods in Bacterial-DNA Fingerprinting

Ken J. Forbes, K D BRUCE, J Z JORDENS, A BALL, Thomas Hugh Pennington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The characterization and comparison of isolates of bacterial species by comparing restriction enzyme digests of their chromosomal DNA (fingerprints) is highly discriminatory for different strains and allows similarities between them to be readily determined. However, the utility of the technique is dependent on the selection of appropriate restriction enzyme(s) and on the method of determining the similarities between the fingerprints generated. We report here a system which circumvents these two problems. The restriction enzyme is selected from amongst those which have a suitable frequency of restriction for given enzyme-genome combinations. The frequencies of restriction enzyme recognition sites are calculated from the frequencies of di- and trinucleotides in sequenced genes from the species of interest using Markov chain analysis. Fingerprints are compared by dividing them up into sections with DNA size standards, scoring the number of bands in a few of these sections, and comparing these scores (numerical profiles) to establish similarities. In this way a single electrophoretic gel yields easily analysable data which can be compared with data from other gels. The time from the acquisition of bacterial isolates to their final characterization is much reduced in comparison to existing methods.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2051-2058
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of General Microbiology
Volume137
Issue number9
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1991

Keywords

  • restriction endonuclease patterns
  • escherichia-coli genome
  • Markov-chain analysis
  • hemophilus-influenzae
  • multivariate-analysis
  • identification
  • epidemiology
  • sequences

Cite this

Forbes, K. J., BRUCE, K. D., JORDENS, J. Z., BALL, A., & Pennington, T. H. (1991). Rapid Methods in Bacterial-DNA Fingerprinting. Journal of General Microbiology, 137(9), 2051-2058.

Rapid Methods in Bacterial-DNA Fingerprinting. / Forbes, Ken J.; BRUCE, K D ; JORDENS, J Z ; BALL, A ; Pennington, Thomas Hugh.

In: Journal of General Microbiology, Vol. 137, No. 9, 09.1991, p. 2051-2058.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Forbes, KJ, BRUCE, KD, JORDENS, JZ, BALL, A & Pennington, TH 1991, 'Rapid Methods in Bacterial-DNA Fingerprinting', Journal of General Microbiology, vol. 137, no. 9, pp. 2051-2058.
Forbes KJ, BRUCE KD, JORDENS JZ, BALL A, Pennington TH. Rapid Methods in Bacterial-DNA Fingerprinting. Journal of General Microbiology. 1991 Sep;137(9):2051-2058.
Forbes, Ken J. ; BRUCE, K D ; JORDENS, J Z ; BALL, A ; Pennington, Thomas Hugh. / Rapid Methods in Bacterial-DNA Fingerprinting. In: Journal of General Microbiology. 1991 ; Vol. 137, No. 9. pp. 2051-2058.
@article{ae4a6d4924dd4288bd5f31c2bd9e3c28,
title = "Rapid Methods in Bacterial-DNA Fingerprinting",
abstract = "The characterization and comparison of isolates of bacterial species by comparing restriction enzyme digests of their chromosomal DNA (fingerprints) is highly discriminatory for different strains and allows similarities between them to be readily determined. However, the utility of the technique is dependent on the selection of appropriate restriction enzyme(s) and on the method of determining the similarities between the fingerprints generated. We report here a system which circumvents these two problems. The restriction enzyme is selected from amongst those which have a suitable frequency of restriction for given enzyme-genome combinations. The frequencies of restriction enzyme recognition sites are calculated from the frequencies of di- and trinucleotides in sequenced genes from the species of interest using Markov chain analysis. Fingerprints are compared by dividing them up into sections with DNA size standards, scoring the number of bands in a few of these sections, and comparing these scores (numerical profiles) to establish similarities. In this way a single electrophoretic gel yields easily analysable data which can be compared with data from other gels. The time from the acquisition of bacterial isolates to their final characterization is much reduced in comparison to existing methods.",
keywords = "restriction endonuclease patterns, escherichia-coli genome, Markov-chain analysis, hemophilus-influenzae, multivariate-analysis, identification, epidemiology, sequences",
author = "Forbes, {Ken J.} and BRUCE, {K D} and JORDENS, {J Z} and A BALL and Pennington, {Thomas Hugh}",
year = "1991",
month = "9",
language = "English",
volume = "137",
pages = "2051--2058",
journal = "Journal of General Microbiology",
issn = "0022-1287",
publisher = "Society for General Microbiology",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rapid Methods in Bacterial-DNA Fingerprinting

AU - Forbes, Ken J.

AU - BRUCE, K D

AU - JORDENS, J Z

AU - BALL, A

AU - Pennington, Thomas Hugh

PY - 1991/9

Y1 - 1991/9

N2 - The characterization and comparison of isolates of bacterial species by comparing restriction enzyme digests of their chromosomal DNA (fingerprints) is highly discriminatory for different strains and allows similarities between them to be readily determined. However, the utility of the technique is dependent on the selection of appropriate restriction enzyme(s) and on the method of determining the similarities between the fingerprints generated. We report here a system which circumvents these two problems. The restriction enzyme is selected from amongst those which have a suitable frequency of restriction for given enzyme-genome combinations. The frequencies of restriction enzyme recognition sites are calculated from the frequencies of di- and trinucleotides in sequenced genes from the species of interest using Markov chain analysis. Fingerprints are compared by dividing them up into sections with DNA size standards, scoring the number of bands in a few of these sections, and comparing these scores (numerical profiles) to establish similarities. In this way a single electrophoretic gel yields easily analysable data which can be compared with data from other gels. The time from the acquisition of bacterial isolates to their final characterization is much reduced in comparison to existing methods.

AB - The characterization and comparison of isolates of bacterial species by comparing restriction enzyme digests of their chromosomal DNA (fingerprints) is highly discriminatory for different strains and allows similarities between them to be readily determined. However, the utility of the technique is dependent on the selection of appropriate restriction enzyme(s) and on the method of determining the similarities between the fingerprints generated. We report here a system which circumvents these two problems. The restriction enzyme is selected from amongst those which have a suitable frequency of restriction for given enzyme-genome combinations. The frequencies of restriction enzyme recognition sites are calculated from the frequencies of di- and trinucleotides in sequenced genes from the species of interest using Markov chain analysis. Fingerprints are compared by dividing them up into sections with DNA size standards, scoring the number of bands in a few of these sections, and comparing these scores (numerical profiles) to establish similarities. In this way a single electrophoretic gel yields easily analysable data which can be compared with data from other gels. The time from the acquisition of bacterial isolates to their final characterization is much reduced in comparison to existing methods.

KW - restriction endonuclease patterns

KW - escherichia-coli genome

KW - Markov-chain analysis

KW - hemophilus-influenzae

KW - multivariate-analysis

KW - identification

KW - epidemiology

KW - sequences

M3 - Article

VL - 137

SP - 2051

EP - 2058

JO - Journal of General Microbiology

JF - Journal of General Microbiology

SN - 0022-1287

IS - 9

ER -