Rare earth oxides for labelling soil aggregate turnover: Impacts of soil properties, labelling method and aggregate structure

Shuhui Liu, Z. C. Guo, Y. B. Pan, Lin L. Zhang, P. D. Hallett, X. H. Peng* (Corresponding Author)

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Rare earth oxides (REOs) as tracers for determining complex processes of soil aggregate formation, stabilization and breakdown could be limited by recovery rate. In this study, the impacts of soil properties, labelling methods and pre-existing aggregate structure on the recovery rate of REOs were analyzed. Our objectives were (i) to optimize the method of REOs as tracers for labelling aggregates; (ii) to investigate the effects of soil properties on the recovery rate of REOs; and (iii) to verify the feasibility of REOs as tracers for studying aggregate turnover. Natural and artificial soil aggregates with a difference in pore structure were labelled with REOs by either a wet or a dry labelling method. After incubating the labelled and repacked soil, the soil samples were separated into four aggregate size fractions (<0.053 mm, 0.053–0.25 mm, 0.25–2 mm and 2–5 mm), and the recovery of REOs in the fractions before and after wet sieving was calculated. Our results show that for natural aggregates the REO distributed more evenly in different aggregate fractions, and the wet sieving recovery of REO was significantly greater following the wet labelling method relative to the dry labelling method (105% vs 84%) (P < 0.05). In contrast, for artificial aggregates the REOs were labelled more homogenously following the dry labelling method, and the wet sieving recovery of REOs following the dry labelling method (98%) was significantly higher than following the wet labelling method (87%–92%) (P < 0.05). However, less pore structure heterogeneity was observed in artificial aggregates relative to natural aggregates. Soil properties (SOC, TN, pH, field capacity, and soil texture) and types of REO had no effect on wet sieving recovery of REOs in natural and artificial aggregates, except for the Gd 2 O 3 in artificial aggregates. A significant linear relationship was observed between predicted and measured aggregate size distributions, especially for larger size fractions. This finding theoretically supports that REOs effectively track the life cycle of soil aggregates. Our results indicate that natural aggregates following the wet labelling method fit better with field conditions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)36-48
Number of pages13
JournalGeoderma
Volume351
Early online date22 May 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2019

Fingerprint

soil aggregate
soil aggregates
oxides
soil properties
soil property
turnover
oxide
sieving
methodology
tracer techniques
aggregate size
tracer
labelling
method
field capacity
soil texture
soil type
soil types
stabilization

Keywords

  • Aggregate stability
  • Aggregation
  • Mean weight diameter
  • Soil organic matter
  • Soil structure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Soil Science

Cite this

Rare earth oxides for labelling soil aggregate turnover : Impacts of soil properties, labelling method and aggregate structure. / Liu, Shuhui ; Guo, Z. C.; Pan, Y. B.; Zhang, Lin L.; Hallett, P. D.; Peng, X. H. (Corresponding Author).

In: Geoderma, Vol. 351, 01.10.2019, p. 36-48.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Liu, Shuhui ; Guo, Z. C. ; Pan, Y. B. ; Zhang, Lin L. ; Hallett, P. D. ; Peng, X. H. / Rare earth oxides for labelling soil aggregate turnover : Impacts of soil properties, labelling method and aggregate structure. In: Geoderma. 2019 ; Vol. 351. pp. 36-48.
@article{c3f6b122858a4cbf9c7dcd897e99cb85,
title = "Rare earth oxides for labelling soil aggregate turnover: Impacts of soil properties, labelling method and aggregate structure",
abstract = "Rare earth oxides (REOs) as tracers for determining complex processes of soil aggregate formation, stabilization and breakdown could be limited by recovery rate. In this study, the impacts of soil properties, labelling methods and pre-existing aggregate structure on the recovery rate of REOs were analyzed. Our objectives were (i) to optimize the method of REOs as tracers for labelling aggregates; (ii) to investigate the effects of soil properties on the recovery rate of REOs; and (iii) to verify the feasibility of REOs as tracers for studying aggregate turnover. Natural and artificial soil aggregates with a difference in pore structure were labelled with REOs by either a wet or a dry labelling method. After incubating the labelled and repacked soil, the soil samples were separated into four aggregate size fractions (<0.053 mm, 0.053–0.25 mm, 0.25–2 mm and 2–5 mm), and the recovery of REOs in the fractions before and after wet sieving was calculated. Our results show that for natural aggregates the REO distributed more evenly in different aggregate fractions, and the wet sieving recovery of REO was significantly greater following the wet labelling method relative to the dry labelling method (105{\%} vs 84{\%}) (P < 0.05). In contrast, for artificial aggregates the REOs were labelled more homogenously following the dry labelling method, and the wet sieving recovery of REOs following the dry labelling method (98{\%}) was significantly higher than following the wet labelling method (87{\%}–92{\%}) (P < 0.05). However, less pore structure heterogeneity was observed in artificial aggregates relative to natural aggregates. Soil properties (SOC, TN, pH, field capacity, and soil texture) and types of REO had no effect on wet sieving recovery of REOs in natural and artificial aggregates, except for the Gd 2 O 3 in artificial aggregates. A significant linear relationship was observed between predicted and measured aggregate size distributions, especially for larger size fractions. This finding theoretically supports that REOs effectively track the life cycle of soil aggregates. Our results indicate that natural aggregates following the wet labelling method fit better with field conditions.",
keywords = "Aggregate stability, Aggregation, Mean weight diameter, Soil organic matter, Soil structure",
author = "Shuhui Liu and Guo, {Z. C.} and Pan, {Y. B.} and Zhang, {Lin L.} and Hallett, {P. D.} and Peng, {X. H.}",
note = "This work was granted by the National Natural Science Foundationof China (41725004), and the China-UK jointed Red Soil Critical Zoneproject from National Natural Science Foundation of China(41571130053) and from the UK Natural Environmental ResearchCouncil (NE/N007611/1).",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.05.015",
language = "English",
volume = "351",
pages = "36--48",
journal = "Geoderma",
issn = "0016-7061",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rare earth oxides for labelling soil aggregate turnover

T2 - Impacts of soil properties, labelling method and aggregate structure

AU - Liu, Shuhui

AU - Guo, Z. C.

AU - Pan, Y. B.

AU - Zhang, Lin L.

AU - Hallett, P. D.

AU - Peng, X. H.

N1 - This work was granted by the National Natural Science Foundationof China (41725004), and the China-UK jointed Red Soil Critical Zoneproject from National Natural Science Foundation of China(41571130053) and from the UK Natural Environmental ResearchCouncil (NE/N007611/1).

PY - 2019/10/1

Y1 - 2019/10/1

N2 - Rare earth oxides (REOs) as tracers for determining complex processes of soil aggregate formation, stabilization and breakdown could be limited by recovery rate. In this study, the impacts of soil properties, labelling methods and pre-existing aggregate structure on the recovery rate of REOs were analyzed. Our objectives were (i) to optimize the method of REOs as tracers for labelling aggregates; (ii) to investigate the effects of soil properties on the recovery rate of REOs; and (iii) to verify the feasibility of REOs as tracers for studying aggregate turnover. Natural and artificial soil aggregates with a difference in pore structure were labelled with REOs by either a wet or a dry labelling method. After incubating the labelled and repacked soil, the soil samples were separated into four aggregate size fractions (<0.053 mm, 0.053–0.25 mm, 0.25–2 mm and 2–5 mm), and the recovery of REOs in the fractions before and after wet sieving was calculated. Our results show that for natural aggregates the REO distributed more evenly in different aggregate fractions, and the wet sieving recovery of REO was significantly greater following the wet labelling method relative to the dry labelling method (105% vs 84%) (P < 0.05). In contrast, for artificial aggregates the REOs were labelled more homogenously following the dry labelling method, and the wet sieving recovery of REOs following the dry labelling method (98%) was significantly higher than following the wet labelling method (87%–92%) (P < 0.05). However, less pore structure heterogeneity was observed in artificial aggregates relative to natural aggregates. Soil properties (SOC, TN, pH, field capacity, and soil texture) and types of REO had no effect on wet sieving recovery of REOs in natural and artificial aggregates, except for the Gd 2 O 3 in artificial aggregates. A significant linear relationship was observed between predicted and measured aggregate size distributions, especially for larger size fractions. This finding theoretically supports that REOs effectively track the life cycle of soil aggregates. Our results indicate that natural aggregates following the wet labelling method fit better with field conditions.

AB - Rare earth oxides (REOs) as tracers for determining complex processes of soil aggregate formation, stabilization and breakdown could be limited by recovery rate. In this study, the impacts of soil properties, labelling methods and pre-existing aggregate structure on the recovery rate of REOs were analyzed. Our objectives were (i) to optimize the method of REOs as tracers for labelling aggregates; (ii) to investigate the effects of soil properties on the recovery rate of REOs; and (iii) to verify the feasibility of REOs as tracers for studying aggregate turnover. Natural and artificial soil aggregates with a difference in pore structure were labelled with REOs by either a wet or a dry labelling method. After incubating the labelled and repacked soil, the soil samples were separated into four aggregate size fractions (<0.053 mm, 0.053–0.25 mm, 0.25–2 mm and 2–5 mm), and the recovery of REOs in the fractions before and after wet sieving was calculated. Our results show that for natural aggregates the REO distributed more evenly in different aggregate fractions, and the wet sieving recovery of REO was significantly greater following the wet labelling method relative to the dry labelling method (105% vs 84%) (P < 0.05). In contrast, for artificial aggregates the REOs were labelled more homogenously following the dry labelling method, and the wet sieving recovery of REOs following the dry labelling method (98%) was significantly higher than following the wet labelling method (87%–92%) (P < 0.05). However, less pore structure heterogeneity was observed in artificial aggregates relative to natural aggregates. Soil properties (SOC, TN, pH, field capacity, and soil texture) and types of REO had no effect on wet sieving recovery of REOs in natural and artificial aggregates, except for the Gd 2 O 3 in artificial aggregates. A significant linear relationship was observed between predicted and measured aggregate size distributions, especially for larger size fractions. This finding theoretically supports that REOs effectively track the life cycle of soil aggregates. Our results indicate that natural aggregates following the wet labelling method fit better with field conditions.

KW - Aggregate stability

KW - Aggregation

KW - Mean weight diameter

KW - Soil organic matter

KW - Soil structure

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065891560&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/rare-earth-oxides-labelling-soil-aggregate-turnover-impacts-soil-properties-labelling-method-aggrega

U2 - 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.05.015

DO - 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.05.015

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85065891560

VL - 351

SP - 36

EP - 48

JO - Geoderma

JF - Geoderma

SN - 0016-7061

ER -