Re-Evaluating Patronage and Reciprocity in Antiquity and New Testament Studies

Erlend Donald MacGillivray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The concepts of ‘patronage’ and ‘reciprocity’ have increasingly been appealed to as being key social components in the world of the New Testament. Yet this article argues that the current confidence placed in the model’s definitions and in their capability to unlock classical reciprocal relationships is misplaced. Chiefly, it is argued that the current definition of ‘patronage’ is too broad, and that it obscures the complexities of ancient reciprocity. Greek euergetism should be considered as a distinct reciprocal phenomenon, and, significantly, Second Temple Jewish society largely abstained from, or was ignorant of the mechanics of, classical patronage and euergetism.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)37-81
Number of pages45
JournalJournal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism
Volume6
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

New Testament Studies
Patronage
Antiquity
Euergetism
Confidence
Second Temple
New Testament

Cite this

Re-Evaluating Patronage and Reciprocity in Antiquity and New Testament Studies. / MacGillivray, Erlend Donald.

In: Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism , Vol. 6, 2009, p. 37-81.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c31bb4016f0946d68a81227ad53060cc,
title = "Re-Evaluating Patronage and Reciprocity in Antiquity and New Testament Studies",
abstract = "The concepts of ‘patronage’ and ‘reciprocity’ have increasingly been appealed to as being key social components in the world of the New Testament. Yet this article argues that the current confidence placed in the model’s definitions and in their capability to unlock classical reciprocal relationships is misplaced. Chiefly, it is argued that the current definition of ‘patronage’ is too broad, and that it obscures the complexities of ancient reciprocity. Greek euergetism should be considered as a distinct reciprocal phenomenon, and, significantly, Second Temple Jewish society largely abstained from, or was ignorant of the mechanics of, classical patronage and euergetism.",
author = "MacGillivray, {Erlend Donald}",
year = "2009",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "37--81",
journal = "Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism",
publisher = "Sheffield Phoenix Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Re-Evaluating Patronage and Reciprocity in Antiquity and New Testament Studies

AU - MacGillivray, Erlend Donald

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - The concepts of ‘patronage’ and ‘reciprocity’ have increasingly been appealed to as being key social components in the world of the New Testament. Yet this article argues that the current confidence placed in the model’s definitions and in their capability to unlock classical reciprocal relationships is misplaced. Chiefly, it is argued that the current definition of ‘patronage’ is too broad, and that it obscures the complexities of ancient reciprocity. Greek euergetism should be considered as a distinct reciprocal phenomenon, and, significantly, Second Temple Jewish society largely abstained from, or was ignorant of the mechanics of, classical patronage and euergetism.

AB - The concepts of ‘patronage’ and ‘reciprocity’ have increasingly been appealed to as being key social components in the world of the New Testament. Yet this article argues that the current confidence placed in the model’s definitions and in their capability to unlock classical reciprocal relationships is misplaced. Chiefly, it is argued that the current definition of ‘patronage’ is too broad, and that it obscures the complexities of ancient reciprocity. Greek euergetism should be considered as a distinct reciprocal phenomenon, and, significantly, Second Temple Jewish society largely abstained from, or was ignorant of the mechanics of, classical patronage and euergetism.

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 37

EP - 81

JO - Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism

JF - Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism

ER -