Abstract
We read with interest the article by Martin et al regarding a “standard set” of outcomes for localised prostate cancer (PCa) [1]. This important project attempts to deal with heterogeneity of outcome selection, definition, measurement, and reporting in PCa management. The authors should be commended on addressing the problem in a thoughtful, methodical, and comprehensive manner.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | e123-e124 |
Number of pages | 2 |
Journal | European Urology |
Volume | 68 |
Issue number | 6 |
Early online date | 29 Aug 2015 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2015 |