Readability of CAMHS Clinical Letters

Daniel M. Bennett (Corresponding Author), Emma Drane, Anne Gilchrist

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Sending clinical letters to patients is common practice in CAMHS. Ease of reading and understanding is important for patients. Readability formulae are feasible and quick ways to assess this.

Method: Clinical letters sent to patients were analysed for readability and whether they reached a preset threshold. Factors influencing readability were investigated.

Results: Most letters were less easily readable than is appropriate. Letters written directly to patients were more readable than copied letters.

Conclusions: Patients sometimes receive letters that are unlikely to be easily readable. Word processing packages contain readability formulae that could be used to check and improve readability of letters.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)161-165
Number of pages5
JournalChild and Adolescent Mental Health
Volume17
Issue number3
Early online date19 Sep 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2012

Fingerprint

Word Processing
Reading

Keywords

  • readability
  • patient involvement
  • communication
  • clinical letters

Cite this

Readability of CAMHS Clinical Letters. / Bennett, Daniel M. (Corresponding Author); Drane, Emma; Gilchrist, Anne.

In: Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Vol. 17, No. 3, 09.2012, p. 161-165.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bennett, Daniel M. ; Drane, Emma ; Gilchrist, Anne. / Readability of CAMHS Clinical Letters. In: Child and Adolescent Mental Health. 2012 ; Vol. 17, No. 3. pp. 161-165.
@article{cf30a7967ddf4ce2950cee96d69e8c45,
title = "Readability of CAMHS Clinical Letters",
abstract = "Background: Sending clinical letters to patients is common practice in CAMHS. Ease of reading and understanding is important for patients. Readability formulae are feasible and quick ways to assess this.Method: Clinical letters sent to patients were analysed for readability and whether they reached a preset threshold. Factors influencing readability were investigated.Results: Most letters were less easily readable than is appropriate. Letters written directly to patients were more readable than copied letters.Conclusions: Patients sometimes receive letters that are unlikely to be easily readable. Word processing packages contain readability formulae that could be used to check and improve readability of letters.",
keywords = "readability, patient involvement, communication, clinical letters",
author = "Bennett, {Daniel M.} and Emma Drane and Anne Gilchrist",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1111/j.1475-3588.2011.00624.x",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "161--165",
journal = "Child and Adolescent Mental Health",
issn = "1475-357X",
publisher = "Wiley: 12 months",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Readability of CAMHS Clinical Letters

AU - Bennett, Daniel M.

AU - Drane, Emma

AU - Gilchrist, Anne

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - Background: Sending clinical letters to patients is common practice in CAMHS. Ease of reading and understanding is important for patients. Readability formulae are feasible and quick ways to assess this.Method: Clinical letters sent to patients were analysed for readability and whether they reached a preset threshold. Factors influencing readability were investigated.Results: Most letters were less easily readable than is appropriate. Letters written directly to patients were more readable than copied letters.Conclusions: Patients sometimes receive letters that are unlikely to be easily readable. Word processing packages contain readability formulae that could be used to check and improve readability of letters.

AB - Background: Sending clinical letters to patients is common practice in CAMHS. Ease of reading and understanding is important for patients. Readability formulae are feasible and quick ways to assess this.Method: Clinical letters sent to patients were analysed for readability and whether they reached a preset threshold. Factors influencing readability were investigated.Results: Most letters were less easily readable than is appropriate. Letters written directly to patients were more readable than copied letters.Conclusions: Patients sometimes receive letters that are unlikely to be easily readable. Word processing packages contain readability formulae that could be used to check and improve readability of letters.

KW - readability

KW - patient involvement

KW - communication

KW - clinical letters

U2 - 10.1111/j.1475-3588.2011.00624.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1475-3588.2011.00624.x

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 161

EP - 165

JO - Child and Adolescent Mental Health

JF - Child and Adolescent Mental Health

SN - 1475-357X

IS - 3

ER -