Reading NGO accountability with Botanski and Thévenot

Evidence from a Sri Lankan NGO

Chandana Gnanapriya Alawattage, Danture Wickramasinghe, Anula Tennakoon

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

This paper develops a conception of accountability, drawing on Botanski and Thévenot’s (1987, 2006) ideas about “orders of worth”. It examines how accountability is enlisted in organizational transformation. Based on ethnographic and historical accounts of a Sri Lankan development NGO, the paper illustrates how a postcolonial order of worth was used to critique its colonial predecessor and to justify a social form of accountability. This led to the formation of a grassroots civil society organization that promoted a development regime of collective labor. The paper also looks at how a subsequent neocolonial order of worth was then used to critique its postcolonial predecessor and to justify an eclectic form of accountability. This led to a transformation of the grassroots civil society organization into an NGO that promoted a neoliberal development regime based on entrepreneurship and social capital. Rather than trying to construct typologies of accountability on the basis of differences in organizational forms, this research argues that the notion of accountability can be used as a framework to analyze social and organizational transformation.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusSubmitted - 2016

Fingerprint

non-governmental organization
responsibility
evidence
civil society
regime
organization
entrepreneurship
social capital
typology
labor

Keywords

  • accountability
  • neo-colonial order
  • NGO
  • orders of worth
  • organizational transformation
  • postcolonial order
  • Sarvodaya
  • Sri Lanka

Cite this

Alawattage, C. G., Wickramasinghe, D., & Tennakoon, A. (2016). Reading NGO accountability with Botanski and Thévenot: Evidence from a Sri Lankan NGO.

Reading NGO accountability with Botanski and Thévenot : Evidence from a Sri Lankan NGO. / Alawattage, Chandana Gnanapriya; Wickramasinghe, Danture; Tennakoon, Anula.

2016.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Alawattage, CG, Wickramasinghe, D & Tennakoon, A 2016, 'Reading NGO accountability with Botanski and Thévenot: Evidence from a Sri Lankan NGO'.
Alawattage, Chandana Gnanapriya ; Wickramasinghe, Danture ; Tennakoon, Anula. / Reading NGO accountability with Botanski and Thévenot : Evidence from a Sri Lankan NGO.
@conference{6b400575c1414c26b758b8311eb308f8,
title = "Reading NGO accountability with Botanski and Th{\'e}venot: Evidence from a Sri Lankan NGO",
abstract = "This paper develops a conception of accountability, drawing on Botanski and Th{\'e}venot’s (1987, 2006) ideas about “orders of worth”. It examines how accountability is enlisted in organizational transformation. Based on ethnographic and historical accounts of a Sri Lankan development NGO, the paper illustrates how a postcolonial order of worth was used to critique its colonial predecessor and to justify a social form of accountability. This led to the formation of a grassroots civil society organization that promoted a development regime of collective labor. The paper also looks at how a subsequent neocolonial order of worth was then used to critique its postcolonial predecessor and to justify an eclectic form of accountability. This led to a transformation of the grassroots civil society organization into an NGO that promoted a neoliberal development regime based on entrepreneurship and social capital. Rather than trying to construct typologies of accountability on the basis of differences in organizational forms, this research argues that the notion of accountability can be used as a framework to analyze social and organizational transformation.",
keywords = "accountability, neo-colonial order, NGO, orders of worth, organizational transformation, postcolonial order, Sarvodaya, Sri Lanka",
author = "Alawattage, {Chandana Gnanapriya} and Danture Wickramasinghe and Anula Tennakoon",
note = "Under review in Accounting, Organisations and Society",
year = "2016",
language = "English",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Reading NGO accountability with Botanski and Thévenot

T2 - Evidence from a Sri Lankan NGO

AU - Alawattage, Chandana Gnanapriya

AU - Wickramasinghe, Danture

AU - Tennakoon, Anula

N1 - Under review in Accounting, Organisations and Society

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This paper develops a conception of accountability, drawing on Botanski and Thévenot’s (1987, 2006) ideas about “orders of worth”. It examines how accountability is enlisted in organizational transformation. Based on ethnographic and historical accounts of a Sri Lankan development NGO, the paper illustrates how a postcolonial order of worth was used to critique its colonial predecessor and to justify a social form of accountability. This led to the formation of a grassroots civil society organization that promoted a development regime of collective labor. The paper also looks at how a subsequent neocolonial order of worth was then used to critique its postcolonial predecessor and to justify an eclectic form of accountability. This led to a transformation of the grassroots civil society organization into an NGO that promoted a neoliberal development regime based on entrepreneurship and social capital. Rather than trying to construct typologies of accountability on the basis of differences in organizational forms, this research argues that the notion of accountability can be used as a framework to analyze social and organizational transformation.

AB - This paper develops a conception of accountability, drawing on Botanski and Thévenot’s (1987, 2006) ideas about “orders of worth”. It examines how accountability is enlisted in organizational transformation. Based on ethnographic and historical accounts of a Sri Lankan development NGO, the paper illustrates how a postcolonial order of worth was used to critique its colonial predecessor and to justify a social form of accountability. This led to the formation of a grassroots civil society organization that promoted a development regime of collective labor. The paper also looks at how a subsequent neocolonial order of worth was then used to critique its postcolonial predecessor and to justify an eclectic form of accountability. This led to a transformation of the grassroots civil society organization into an NGO that promoted a neoliberal development regime based on entrepreneurship and social capital. Rather than trying to construct typologies of accountability on the basis of differences in organizational forms, this research argues that the notion of accountability can be used as a framework to analyze social and organizational transformation.

KW - accountability

KW - neo-colonial order

KW - NGO

KW - orders of worth

KW - organizational transformation

KW - postcolonial order

KW - Sarvodaya

KW - Sri Lanka

M3 - Paper

ER -