Real-time spatial management approaches to reduce bycatch and discards

Experiences from Europe and the United States

Alyson S. Little*, Coby L. Needle, Ray Hilborn, Daniel S. Holland, C. Tara Marshall

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Spatial management measures are currently being used to manage bycatch and discards, given the spatial heterogeneity of fish distributions. However, permanent fishing closures are often poorly implemented, unresponsive to stock dynamics and do not achieve their management objectives. Recently, real-time spatial management tools for managing bycatch and discards implemented under either a comanagement or self-governance approach have been introduced in Europe and the US. Real-time catch and discard information is shared among fishers to incentivise and encourage vessels to leave areas of high bycatch. Here, the similarities and differences, in governance, implementation and management of ten real-time spatial management systems from across Europe and the US are reviewed. A framework is developed to characterize the attributes associated with voluntary, private and regulatory real-time spatial management tools. Challenges and management practices in the different case studies are reviewed providing insights for designing these spatial management tools. The results illustrate that real-time spatial management approaches can create incentives for fishers to develop, use and share information and technology to avoid undesired catch. Compared with Europe, the US has developed spatial management tools with more truly real-time mechanisms and with greater involvement of the fishing industry in designing and operating the tools.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)576-602
Number of pages27
JournalFish and Fisheries
Volume16
Issue number4
Early online date18 Mar 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2015

Fingerprint

bycatch
governance
governance approach
collaborative management
fish industry
Europe
fishing industry
comanagement
management systems
management practice
incentive
fishing
vessel
case studies
fish

Keywords

  • Bycatch
  • Discarding
  • Fisheries
  • Real-time closures
  • Risk pool agreements
  • Spatial management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Aquatic Science
  • Oceanography
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Real-time spatial management approaches to reduce bycatch and discards : Experiences from Europe and the United States. / Little, Alyson S.; Needle, Coby L.; Hilborn, Ray; Holland, Daniel S.; Marshall, C. Tara.

In: Fish and Fisheries, Vol. 16, No. 4, 01.12.2015, p. 576-602.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Little, Alyson S. ; Needle, Coby L. ; Hilborn, Ray ; Holland, Daniel S. ; Marshall, C. Tara. / Real-time spatial management approaches to reduce bycatch and discards : Experiences from Europe and the United States. In: Fish and Fisheries. 2015 ; Vol. 16, No. 4. pp. 576-602.
@article{74798f85644b42c3ae2ea2abf8d75c6b,
title = "Real-time spatial management approaches to reduce bycatch and discards: Experiences from Europe and the United States",
abstract = "Spatial management measures are currently being used to manage bycatch and discards, given the spatial heterogeneity of fish distributions. However, permanent fishing closures are often poorly implemented, unresponsive to stock dynamics and do not achieve their management objectives. Recently, real-time spatial management tools for managing bycatch and discards implemented under either a comanagement or self-governance approach have been introduced in Europe and the US. Real-time catch and discard information is shared among fishers to incentivise and encourage vessels to leave areas of high bycatch. Here, the similarities and differences, in governance, implementation and management of ten real-time spatial management systems from across Europe and the US are reviewed. A framework is developed to characterize the attributes associated with voluntary, private and regulatory real-time spatial management tools. Challenges and management practices in the different case studies are reviewed providing insights for designing these spatial management tools. The results illustrate that real-time spatial management approaches can create incentives for fishers to develop, use and share information and technology to avoid undesired catch. Compared with Europe, the US has developed spatial management tools with more truly real-time mechanisms and with greater involvement of the fishing industry in designing and operating the tools.",
keywords = "Bycatch, Discarding, Fisheries, Real-time closures, Risk pool agreements, Spatial management",
author = "Little, {Alyson S.} and Needle, {Coby L.} and Ray Hilborn and Holland, {Daniel S.} and Marshall, {C. Tara}",
note = "Date of Acceptance: 22/01/2014 Funded by Winston Churchill Memorial Trust Natural Environment Research Council Scottish White Fish Producers' Association Limited",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/faf.12080",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "576--602",
journal = "Fish and Fisheries",
issn = "1467-2960",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Real-time spatial management approaches to reduce bycatch and discards

T2 - Experiences from Europe and the United States

AU - Little, Alyson S.

AU - Needle, Coby L.

AU - Hilborn, Ray

AU - Holland, Daniel S.

AU - Marshall, C. Tara

N1 - Date of Acceptance: 22/01/2014 Funded by Winston Churchill Memorial Trust Natural Environment Research Council Scottish White Fish Producers' Association Limited

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - Spatial management measures are currently being used to manage bycatch and discards, given the spatial heterogeneity of fish distributions. However, permanent fishing closures are often poorly implemented, unresponsive to stock dynamics and do not achieve their management objectives. Recently, real-time spatial management tools for managing bycatch and discards implemented under either a comanagement or self-governance approach have been introduced in Europe and the US. Real-time catch and discard information is shared among fishers to incentivise and encourage vessels to leave areas of high bycatch. Here, the similarities and differences, in governance, implementation and management of ten real-time spatial management systems from across Europe and the US are reviewed. A framework is developed to characterize the attributes associated with voluntary, private and regulatory real-time spatial management tools. Challenges and management practices in the different case studies are reviewed providing insights for designing these spatial management tools. The results illustrate that real-time spatial management approaches can create incentives for fishers to develop, use and share information and technology to avoid undesired catch. Compared with Europe, the US has developed spatial management tools with more truly real-time mechanisms and with greater involvement of the fishing industry in designing and operating the tools.

AB - Spatial management measures are currently being used to manage bycatch and discards, given the spatial heterogeneity of fish distributions. However, permanent fishing closures are often poorly implemented, unresponsive to stock dynamics and do not achieve their management objectives. Recently, real-time spatial management tools for managing bycatch and discards implemented under either a comanagement or self-governance approach have been introduced in Europe and the US. Real-time catch and discard information is shared among fishers to incentivise and encourage vessels to leave areas of high bycatch. Here, the similarities and differences, in governance, implementation and management of ten real-time spatial management systems from across Europe and the US are reviewed. A framework is developed to characterize the attributes associated with voluntary, private and regulatory real-time spatial management tools. Challenges and management practices in the different case studies are reviewed providing insights for designing these spatial management tools. The results illustrate that real-time spatial management approaches can create incentives for fishers to develop, use and share information and technology to avoid undesired catch. Compared with Europe, the US has developed spatial management tools with more truly real-time mechanisms and with greater involvement of the fishing industry in designing and operating the tools.

KW - Bycatch

KW - Discarding

KW - Fisheries

KW - Real-time closures

KW - Risk pool agreements

KW - Spatial management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944445989&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/faf.12080

DO - 10.1111/faf.12080

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 576

EP - 602

JO - Fish and Fisheries

JF - Fish and Fisheries

SN - 1467-2960

IS - 4

ER -