Reality and Fiction Cues in Medical Patient Simulation: An Interview Study with Anesthesiologists

Peter Dieckmann, Tanja Manser, Theo Wehner, Marcus Rall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Following the framework of ecological validity, and taking into account the social character of simulation, we investigated how six anesthesiologists each experienced three patient simulation scenarios. Using content analysis, we describe factors mentioned in the 18 half-structured interviews that were relevant for the perceived realism of the scenarios: overall impression and medical plausibility, participants' own actions, role play of the simulator team, workload, technical aspects, group dynamics, and anticipations. Further, we describe the circumstances under which these relevant elements were experienced as fiction cues (emphasizing differences between scenarios and clinical cases) or as reality cues (emphasizing similarities between scenarios and clinical cases). The experience of the scenarios among the anesthesiologists was dynamic over time and differed among participants. Considering the described elements and their character as either fiction or reality cues improves the understanding of the still-unanswered question of why simulators and simulations "work." Simulators and simulations help in designing, optimizing, conducting, and analyzing patient simulation scenarios in a goal-oriented fashion.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)148-168
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making
Volume1
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Jun 2007

Fingerprint

Patient Simulation
Cues
Simulators
Interviews
Workload
Statistical Factor Analysis
Anesthesiologists

Cite this

Reality and Fiction Cues in Medical Patient Simulation : An Interview Study with Anesthesiologists. / Dieckmann, Peter; Manser, Tanja; Wehner, Theo; Rall, Marcus.

In: Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, Vol. 1, No. 2, 20.06.2007, p. 148-168.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dieckmann, Peter ; Manser, Tanja ; Wehner, Theo ; Rall, Marcus. / Reality and Fiction Cues in Medical Patient Simulation : An Interview Study with Anesthesiologists. In: Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making. 2007 ; Vol. 1, No. 2. pp. 148-168.
@article{29c5ff194d1f4a8baff6653247c0fe31,
title = "Reality and Fiction Cues in Medical Patient Simulation: An Interview Study with Anesthesiologists",
abstract = "Following the framework of ecological validity, and taking into account the social character of simulation, we investigated how six anesthesiologists each experienced three patient simulation scenarios. Using content analysis, we describe factors mentioned in the 18 half-structured interviews that were relevant for the perceived realism of the scenarios: overall impression and medical plausibility, participants' own actions, role play of the simulator team, workload, technical aspects, group dynamics, and anticipations. Further, we describe the circumstances under which these relevant elements were experienced as fiction cues (emphasizing differences between scenarios and clinical cases) or as reality cues (emphasizing similarities between scenarios and clinical cases). The experience of the scenarios among the anesthesiologists was dynamic over time and differed among participants. Considering the described elements and their character as either fiction or reality cues improves the understanding of the still-unanswered question of why simulators and simulations {"}work.{"} Simulators and simulations help in designing, optimizing, conducting, and analyzing patient simulation scenarios in a goal-oriented fashion.",
author = "Peter Dieckmann and Tanja Manser and Theo Wehner and Marcus Rall",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1518/155534307X232820",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "148--168",
journal = "Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making",
issn = "1555-3434",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reality and Fiction Cues in Medical Patient Simulation

T2 - An Interview Study with Anesthesiologists

AU - Dieckmann, Peter

AU - Manser, Tanja

AU - Wehner, Theo

AU - Rall, Marcus

PY - 2007/6/20

Y1 - 2007/6/20

N2 - Following the framework of ecological validity, and taking into account the social character of simulation, we investigated how six anesthesiologists each experienced three patient simulation scenarios. Using content analysis, we describe factors mentioned in the 18 half-structured interviews that were relevant for the perceived realism of the scenarios: overall impression and medical plausibility, participants' own actions, role play of the simulator team, workload, technical aspects, group dynamics, and anticipations. Further, we describe the circumstances under which these relevant elements were experienced as fiction cues (emphasizing differences between scenarios and clinical cases) or as reality cues (emphasizing similarities between scenarios and clinical cases). The experience of the scenarios among the anesthesiologists was dynamic over time and differed among participants. Considering the described elements and their character as either fiction or reality cues improves the understanding of the still-unanswered question of why simulators and simulations "work." Simulators and simulations help in designing, optimizing, conducting, and analyzing patient simulation scenarios in a goal-oriented fashion.

AB - Following the framework of ecological validity, and taking into account the social character of simulation, we investigated how six anesthesiologists each experienced three patient simulation scenarios. Using content analysis, we describe factors mentioned in the 18 half-structured interviews that were relevant for the perceived realism of the scenarios: overall impression and medical plausibility, participants' own actions, role play of the simulator team, workload, technical aspects, group dynamics, and anticipations. Further, we describe the circumstances under which these relevant elements were experienced as fiction cues (emphasizing differences between scenarios and clinical cases) or as reality cues (emphasizing similarities between scenarios and clinical cases). The experience of the scenarios among the anesthesiologists was dynamic over time and differed among participants. Considering the described elements and their character as either fiction or reality cues improves the understanding of the still-unanswered question of why simulators and simulations "work." Simulators and simulations help in designing, optimizing, conducting, and analyzing patient simulation scenarios in a goal-oriented fashion.

U2 - 10.1518/155534307X232820

DO - 10.1518/155534307X232820

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 148

EP - 168

JO - Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making

JF - Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making

SN - 1555-3434

IS - 2

ER -