Abstract
Arguing that resistance to the state is too narrow a conceptualization of apolitical project that challenges neoliberalism, we posit that there are latent, residualapparatuses of the state which can be activated as part of a systematic progressive politics.We examine Massachusetts’ “Dover amendment”, a legal framework which governs grouphome siting throughout the state. Dover offers a powerful tool with which to resist aneoliberal socio-spatial agenda, though it has been underutilized toward enabling analternative landscape. We analyze how and why Dover has often remained latent as a toolfor socio-spatial resistance, and consider a provocative case in Framingham, Massachusettsthat suggests how residual state apparatuses may be leveraged in support of an explicitlyresistive, progressive agenda
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 61-79 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Antipode |
Volume | 45 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 16 May 2012 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2013 |
Keywords
- Democratic radical pluralism
- Group home siting
- Law
- Resistance
- State
- Urban politics