Recruitment challenges in stroke rehabilitation randomized controlled trials: a qualitative exploration of trialists’ perspectives using Framework analysis

Kris McGill*, Jodie McGarry, Catherine Sackley, Jon Godwin, Avril Nicoll, Marian C Brady

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective: To explore the underlying reasons for recruitment difficulties to stroke rehabilitation randomized controlled trials from the perspective of trialists. Design: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews and Framework analysis. Participants: Twenty multidisciplinary stroke rehabilitation trialists across 13 countries with a range of clinical and research experience. Methods: Twenty semi-structured telephone interviews were carried out. Purposeful sampling ensured a range of opinions were gathered from across the international stroke rehabilitation research community. Using Framework analysis, the analytical framework was formed by three researchers and tested before being applied to the total dataset. Results: Three themes described the trialists’ perception of the underlying reasons for recruitment difficulties: (i) decision making, (ii) importance of recruiters and (iii) a broken system. Trialists described frequently disregarding evidence in favour of prior research experiences when planning randomized controlled trial recruitment. All felt that the relationship between the research and clinical teams was vital to ensure recruiters prioritized and found value in recruitment to the trial. Experienced trialists were frustrated by the lack of reporting of the reality of running trials, research governance demands and the feeling that they had to deliberately underestimate recruitment timeframes to secure funding. Conclusion: Stroke rehabilitation trialists described recruitment difficulties which may be related to their experiential based recruitment decision making, a lack of understanding of how best to incentivize and maintain relationships with recruiters and unrealistic bureaucratic expectations both in terms of gaining funding and research governance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1122-1133
Number of pages12
JournalClinical Rehabilitation
Volume34
Issue number8
Early online date3 Jun 2020
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 3 Jun 2020

Keywords

  • Stroke
  • qualitative study
  • recruitment
  • rehabilitation
  • CLINICAL-RESEARCH
  • ISSUES
  • PRIMARY-CARE
  • BYSTANDER INTERVENTION
  • SIZE
  • PARTICIPANT RECRUITMENT

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Recruitment challenges in stroke rehabilitation randomized controlled trials: a qualitative exploration of trialists’ perspectives using Framework analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this