Abstract
Background Stillbirth remains a significant problem worldwide. Unexplained stillbirth is the most common classification of cause of death accounting for between 10–70%. Studies that investigate recurrence risk of unexplained stillbirth yield inconsistent results.
Objective To investigate the association between unexplained stillbirth in a first pregnancy and recurrence risk of stillbirth in a subsequent pregnancy in high-income countries.
Methods Six databases were searched using a comprehensive search strategy to identify relevant cohort and case-control studies. No publication status, language or date restrictions were applied. Internet resources and reference lists of relevant papers were also searched. Using explicit a priori criteria two reviewers independently screened titles to identify eligible studies, extract data and assess methodological quality. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to combine results of included studies.
Results Seventeen studies were included in the systematic review fifteen of which were considered eligible for the meta-analysis. Stillbirth and unexplained stillbirth in a first pregnancy was associated with an increased risk of stillbirth in a subsequent pregnancy. Compared with women who had a live birth in a first pregnancy the pooled crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of stillbirth recurrence for women with a previous stillbirth were 4.75(3.74, 6.03) and 2.34(1.53, 3.57) respectively. Compared with women who had a live birth in a first pregnancy the pooled adjusted OR of stillbirth recurrence for women with a previous unexplained stillbirth was 1.83(1.38, 2.44)
Conclusion This systematic review and meta-analysis provides some evidence to support an increased recurrence risk for unexplained stillbirth.
Objective To investigate the association between unexplained stillbirth in a first pregnancy and recurrence risk of stillbirth in a subsequent pregnancy in high-income countries.
Methods Six databases were searched using a comprehensive search strategy to identify relevant cohort and case-control studies. No publication status, language or date restrictions were applied. Internet resources and reference lists of relevant papers were also searched. Using explicit a priori criteria two reviewers independently screened titles to identify eligible studies, extract data and assess methodological quality. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to combine results of included studies.
Results Seventeen studies were included in the systematic review fifteen of which were considered eligible for the meta-analysis. Stillbirth and unexplained stillbirth in a first pregnancy was associated with an increased risk of stillbirth in a subsequent pregnancy. Compared with women who had a live birth in a first pregnancy the pooled crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of stillbirth recurrence for women with a previous stillbirth were 4.75(3.74, 6.03) and 2.34(1.53, 3.57) respectively. Compared with women who had a live birth in a first pregnancy the pooled adjusted OR of stillbirth recurrence for women with a previous unexplained stillbirth was 1.83(1.38, 2.44)
Conclusion This systematic review and meta-analysis provides some evidence to support an increased recurrence risk for unexplained stillbirth.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | A153 |
Journal | Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition |
Volume | 99 |
Issue number | Suppl. 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2014 |