Red deer Cervus elephus vigilance behaviour differs with habitat and type of human disturbance

Sevvandi Jayakody, Angela M. Sibbald, Iain J. Gordon, Xavier Lambin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Red deer Cervus elaphus, even in wilderness areas, are increasingly exposed to disturbance from human recreation as well as hunting, and it has been suggested that both types of disturbance may be perceived as a predation risk. We studied the vigilance behaviour of red deer in the Scottish Highlands, in sites with traditionally high numbers of visitors ('disturbed') and sites with relatively few visitors ('less-disturbed') during the main recreational season (spring and summer), and in their mating grounds during the hunting season (autumn and winter). We carried out direct observations, using scan sampling at 3-minute intervals for 1-hour periods, and recorded the number of animals in each group that were vigilant and their mode of vigilance. During the recreational season, in both the disturbed and less-disturbed sites, data were collected in habitats with different levels of cover (grassland, heather and woodland). The percentage of animals that were vigilant was higher in disturbed than in less-disturbed sites, and higher in disturbed grassland (poor cover) and heather (intermediate cover) than in disturbed woodland (good cover). The majority of the vigilant animals in disturbed heather and woodland habitats and in all the less-disturbed habitats were standing. In disturbed grassland, however, lying was the main posture whilst vigilant. In both disturbed grassland and heather, the percentage of vigilant animals that were moving was higher than in woodland or the less-disturbed habitats. In disturbed sites, the deer were more likely to be aggregated when vigilance levels were high. During the hunting season, the overall level of vigilance was higher than at any sites during the recreational season, and the majority of vigilant animals were moving. We conclude that red deer respond to disturbance from human recreational activities by increasing their level of vigilance, but that the nature of their response varies with the level of cover available. We suggest that red deer may lie down when keeping vigil in grasslands, because lying animals are less conspicuous and the low cover will still allow animals to scan their surroundings. We conclude that, although they respond to both types of disturbance by increasing vigilance, red deer perceive human recreation as a less acute threat than hunting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)81-91
Number of pages11
JournalWildlife Biology
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2008

Keywords

  • behaviour
  • Cervus elaphus
  • human disturbance
  • hunting
  • predation risk
  • recreation
  • red deer
  • vigilance
  • flight initiation distance
  • group-size
  • antipredatory vigilance
  • scanning behavior
  • bighorn sheep
  • responses
  • birds
  • conservation
  • flocking

Cite this

Red deer Cervus elephus vigilance behaviour differs with habitat and type of human disturbance. / Jayakody, Sevvandi; Sibbald, Angela M.; Gordon, Iain J.; Lambin, Xavier.

In: Wildlife Biology, Vol. 14, No. 1, 03.2008, p. 81-91.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jayakody, Sevvandi ; Sibbald, Angela M. ; Gordon, Iain J. ; Lambin, Xavier. / Red deer Cervus elephus vigilance behaviour differs with habitat and type of human disturbance. In: Wildlife Biology. 2008 ; Vol. 14, No. 1. pp. 81-91.
@article{8774f13a85924d02a36981d197713143,
title = "Red deer Cervus elephus vigilance behaviour differs with habitat and type of human disturbance",
abstract = "Red deer Cervus elaphus, even in wilderness areas, are increasingly exposed to disturbance from human recreation as well as hunting, and it has been suggested that both types of disturbance may be perceived as a predation risk. We studied the vigilance behaviour of red deer in the Scottish Highlands, in sites with traditionally high numbers of visitors ('disturbed') and sites with relatively few visitors ('less-disturbed') during the main recreational season (spring and summer), and in their mating grounds during the hunting season (autumn and winter). We carried out direct observations, using scan sampling at 3-minute intervals for 1-hour periods, and recorded the number of animals in each group that were vigilant and their mode of vigilance. During the recreational season, in both the disturbed and less-disturbed sites, data were collected in habitats with different levels of cover (grassland, heather and woodland). The percentage of animals that were vigilant was higher in disturbed than in less-disturbed sites, and higher in disturbed grassland (poor cover) and heather (intermediate cover) than in disturbed woodland (good cover). The majority of the vigilant animals in disturbed heather and woodland habitats and in all the less-disturbed habitats were standing. In disturbed grassland, however, lying was the main posture whilst vigilant. In both disturbed grassland and heather, the percentage of vigilant animals that were moving was higher than in woodland or the less-disturbed habitats. In disturbed sites, the deer were more likely to be aggregated when vigilance levels were high. During the hunting season, the overall level of vigilance was higher than at any sites during the recreational season, and the majority of vigilant animals were moving. We conclude that red deer respond to disturbance from human recreational activities by increasing their level of vigilance, but that the nature of their response varies with the level of cover available. We suggest that red deer may lie down when keeping vigil in grasslands, because lying animals are less conspicuous and the low cover will still allow animals to scan their surroundings. We conclude that, although they respond to both types of disturbance by increasing vigilance, red deer perceive human recreation as a less acute threat than hunting.",
keywords = "behaviour, Cervus elaphus, human disturbance, hunting, predation risk, recreation, red deer, vigilance, flight initiation distance, group-size, antipredatory vigilance, scanning behavior, bighorn sheep, responses, birds, conservation, flocking",
author = "Sevvandi Jayakody and Sibbald, {Angela M.} and Gordon, {Iain J.} and Xavier Lambin",
year = "2008",
month = "3",
doi = "10.2981/0909-6396(2008)14[81:RDCEVB]2.0.CO;2",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "81--91",
journal = "Wildlife Biology",
issn = "0909-6396",
publisher = "Nordic Council for Wildlife Research",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Red deer Cervus elephus vigilance behaviour differs with habitat and type of human disturbance

AU - Jayakody, Sevvandi

AU - Sibbald, Angela M.

AU - Gordon, Iain J.

AU - Lambin, Xavier

PY - 2008/3

Y1 - 2008/3

N2 - Red deer Cervus elaphus, even in wilderness areas, are increasingly exposed to disturbance from human recreation as well as hunting, and it has been suggested that both types of disturbance may be perceived as a predation risk. We studied the vigilance behaviour of red deer in the Scottish Highlands, in sites with traditionally high numbers of visitors ('disturbed') and sites with relatively few visitors ('less-disturbed') during the main recreational season (spring and summer), and in their mating grounds during the hunting season (autumn and winter). We carried out direct observations, using scan sampling at 3-minute intervals for 1-hour periods, and recorded the number of animals in each group that were vigilant and their mode of vigilance. During the recreational season, in both the disturbed and less-disturbed sites, data were collected in habitats with different levels of cover (grassland, heather and woodland). The percentage of animals that were vigilant was higher in disturbed than in less-disturbed sites, and higher in disturbed grassland (poor cover) and heather (intermediate cover) than in disturbed woodland (good cover). The majority of the vigilant animals in disturbed heather and woodland habitats and in all the less-disturbed habitats were standing. In disturbed grassland, however, lying was the main posture whilst vigilant. In both disturbed grassland and heather, the percentage of vigilant animals that were moving was higher than in woodland or the less-disturbed habitats. In disturbed sites, the deer were more likely to be aggregated when vigilance levels were high. During the hunting season, the overall level of vigilance was higher than at any sites during the recreational season, and the majority of vigilant animals were moving. We conclude that red deer respond to disturbance from human recreational activities by increasing their level of vigilance, but that the nature of their response varies with the level of cover available. We suggest that red deer may lie down when keeping vigil in grasslands, because lying animals are less conspicuous and the low cover will still allow animals to scan their surroundings. We conclude that, although they respond to both types of disturbance by increasing vigilance, red deer perceive human recreation as a less acute threat than hunting.

AB - Red deer Cervus elaphus, even in wilderness areas, are increasingly exposed to disturbance from human recreation as well as hunting, and it has been suggested that both types of disturbance may be perceived as a predation risk. We studied the vigilance behaviour of red deer in the Scottish Highlands, in sites with traditionally high numbers of visitors ('disturbed') and sites with relatively few visitors ('less-disturbed') during the main recreational season (spring and summer), and in their mating grounds during the hunting season (autumn and winter). We carried out direct observations, using scan sampling at 3-minute intervals for 1-hour periods, and recorded the number of animals in each group that were vigilant and their mode of vigilance. During the recreational season, in both the disturbed and less-disturbed sites, data were collected in habitats with different levels of cover (grassland, heather and woodland). The percentage of animals that were vigilant was higher in disturbed than in less-disturbed sites, and higher in disturbed grassland (poor cover) and heather (intermediate cover) than in disturbed woodland (good cover). The majority of the vigilant animals in disturbed heather and woodland habitats and in all the less-disturbed habitats were standing. In disturbed grassland, however, lying was the main posture whilst vigilant. In both disturbed grassland and heather, the percentage of vigilant animals that were moving was higher than in woodland or the less-disturbed habitats. In disturbed sites, the deer were more likely to be aggregated when vigilance levels were high. During the hunting season, the overall level of vigilance was higher than at any sites during the recreational season, and the majority of vigilant animals were moving. We conclude that red deer respond to disturbance from human recreational activities by increasing their level of vigilance, but that the nature of their response varies with the level of cover available. We suggest that red deer may lie down when keeping vigil in grasslands, because lying animals are less conspicuous and the low cover will still allow animals to scan their surroundings. We conclude that, although they respond to both types of disturbance by increasing vigilance, red deer perceive human recreation as a less acute threat than hunting.

KW - behaviour

KW - Cervus elaphus

KW - human disturbance

KW - hunting

KW - predation risk

KW - recreation

KW - red deer

KW - vigilance

KW - flight initiation distance

KW - group-size

KW - antipredatory vigilance

KW - scanning behavior

KW - bighorn sheep

KW - responses

KW - birds

KW - conservation

KW - flocking

U2 - 10.2981/0909-6396(2008)14[81:RDCEVB]2.0.CO;2

DO - 10.2981/0909-6396(2008)14[81:RDCEVB]2.0.CO;2

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 81

EP - 91

JO - Wildlife Biology

JF - Wildlife Biology

SN - 0909-6396

IS - 1

ER -