Reflecting “field”

two Vepsian villages and three researchers

Laura Siragusa, Madis Arukask (Corresponding Author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

For social researchers a field site is continuously made by the interactions between the researchers and the ecology, including ideologies, present at the time when research is conducted. Such interactions and their interpretations change over time due to the dynamism of life in the field and the emergence of new methods and academic discussions. In order to do this, we have taken two Vepsian villages and three researchers of different background—including ourselves—and compared our working ways. This has enabled us to appreciate the strengths as well as the weaknesses of our own practices and to recognize the value of self-irony as a method of exploration and discovery. The dialogic approach of the article matches our theoretical scope as we have developed an understanding of field as a space where an honest and open discussion is possible.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)75-105
Number of pages31
JournalSibirica : Interdisciplinary Journal of Siberian Studies
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2017

Fingerprint

village
dynamism
irony
interaction
Ideologies
ecology
interpretation
Village
Values
time
Interaction
Ecology
Dynamism
Self-irony
Ideology

Keywords

  • field
  • history of antropology
  • North
  • reflective anthropology
  • Veps

Cite this

Reflecting “field” : two Vepsian villages and three researchers. / Siragusa, Laura; Arukask, Madis (Corresponding Author).

In: Sibirica : Interdisciplinary Journal of Siberian Studies, Vol. 16, No. 1, 01.03.2017, p. 75-105.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6eb8c8e53d174239a6ce50b0b95724ac,
title = "Reflecting “field”: two Vepsian villages and three researchers",
abstract = "For social researchers a field site is continuously made by the interactions between the researchers and the ecology, including ideologies, present at the time when research is conducted. Such interactions and their interpretations change over time due to the dynamism of life in the field and the emergence of new methods and academic discussions. In order to do this, we have taken two Vepsian villages and three researchers of different background—including ourselves—and compared our working ways. This has enabled us to appreciate the strengths as well as the weaknesses of our own practices and to recognize the value of self-irony as a method of exploration and discovery. The dialogic approach of the article matches our theoretical scope as we have developed an understanding of field as a space where an honest and open discussion is possible.",
keywords = "field, history of antropology, North, reflective anthropology, Veps",
author = "Laura Siragusa and Madis Arukask",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3167/sib.2017.160104",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "75--105",
journal = "Sibirica : Interdisciplinary Journal of Siberian Studies",
issn = "1361-7362",
publisher = "Ryburn",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reflecting “field”

T2 - two Vepsian villages and three researchers

AU - Siragusa, Laura

AU - Arukask, Madis

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - For social researchers a field site is continuously made by the interactions between the researchers and the ecology, including ideologies, present at the time when research is conducted. Such interactions and their interpretations change over time due to the dynamism of life in the field and the emergence of new methods and academic discussions. In order to do this, we have taken two Vepsian villages and three researchers of different background—including ourselves—and compared our working ways. This has enabled us to appreciate the strengths as well as the weaknesses of our own practices and to recognize the value of self-irony as a method of exploration and discovery. The dialogic approach of the article matches our theoretical scope as we have developed an understanding of field as a space where an honest and open discussion is possible.

AB - For social researchers a field site is continuously made by the interactions between the researchers and the ecology, including ideologies, present at the time when research is conducted. Such interactions and their interpretations change over time due to the dynamism of life in the field and the emergence of new methods and academic discussions. In order to do this, we have taken two Vepsian villages and three researchers of different background—including ourselves—and compared our working ways. This has enabled us to appreciate the strengths as well as the weaknesses of our own practices and to recognize the value of self-irony as a method of exploration and discovery. The dialogic approach of the article matches our theoretical scope as we have developed an understanding of field as a space where an honest and open discussion is possible.

KW - field

KW - history of antropology

KW - North

KW - reflective anthropology

KW - Veps

U2 - 10.3167/sib.2017.160104

DO - 10.3167/sib.2017.160104

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 75

EP - 105

JO - Sibirica : Interdisciplinary Journal of Siberian Studies

JF - Sibirica : Interdisciplinary Journal of Siberian Studies

SN - 1361-7362

IS - 1

ER -