Reflections on popular science in Britain: genres, categories and historians

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This essay surveys the historiography of popular science in Britain since 1994 and suggests two further ways in which the history of popular science might be reintegrated with larger narratives and concerns. First, it suggests that a closer and more systematic engagement with literary history, especially in relation to genre, has the potential to transform our understanding of science as a set of communicative practices. Second, it analyzes current historians' usage of the categories “popular science” and “science popularization” and argues against the view that these categories should be expunged from our vocabulary (except as actors' categories). Handled correctly, these “umbrella‐labels” can function as vital tools of communication with other disciplines and wider constituencies, as well as within our own field.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)333-345
Number of pages13
JournalIsis
Volume100
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2009

Fingerprint

history
transform
science
Historian
Popular Science
communication
Vocabulary
History
Popularization of Science
Constituency
Literary History
Historiography
Communication
Communicative Practice
vocabulary

Cite this

Reflections on popular science in Britain : genres, categories and historians. / O'Connor, Ralph.

In: Isis, Vol. 100, No. 2, 06.2009, p. 333-345.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{848481ee697f41eca236ac6e8795978f,
title = "Reflections on popular science in Britain: genres, categories and historians",
abstract = "This essay surveys the historiography of popular science in Britain since 1994 and suggests two further ways in which the history of popular science might be reintegrated with larger narratives and concerns. First, it suggests that a closer and more systematic engagement with literary history, especially in relation to genre, has the potential to transform our understanding of science as a set of communicative practices. Second, it analyzes current historians' usage of the categories “popular science” and “science popularization” and argues against the view that these categories should be expunged from our vocabulary (except as actors' categories). Handled correctly, these “umbrella‐labels” can function as vital tools of communication with other disciplines and wider constituencies, as well as within our own field.",
author = "Ralph O'Connor",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1086/599549",
language = "English",
volume = "100",
pages = "333--345",
journal = "Isis",
issn = "0021-1753",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reflections on popular science in Britain

T2 - genres, categories and historians

AU - O'Connor, Ralph

PY - 2009/6

Y1 - 2009/6

N2 - This essay surveys the historiography of popular science in Britain since 1994 and suggests two further ways in which the history of popular science might be reintegrated with larger narratives and concerns. First, it suggests that a closer and more systematic engagement with literary history, especially in relation to genre, has the potential to transform our understanding of science as a set of communicative practices. Second, it analyzes current historians' usage of the categories “popular science” and “science popularization” and argues against the view that these categories should be expunged from our vocabulary (except as actors' categories). Handled correctly, these “umbrella‐labels” can function as vital tools of communication with other disciplines and wider constituencies, as well as within our own field.

AB - This essay surveys the historiography of popular science in Britain since 1994 and suggests two further ways in which the history of popular science might be reintegrated with larger narratives and concerns. First, it suggests that a closer and more systematic engagement with literary history, especially in relation to genre, has the potential to transform our understanding of science as a set of communicative practices. Second, it analyzes current historians' usage of the categories “popular science” and “science popularization” and argues against the view that these categories should be expunged from our vocabulary (except as actors' categories). Handled correctly, these “umbrella‐labels” can function as vital tools of communication with other disciplines and wider constituencies, as well as within our own field.

U2 - 10.1086/599549

DO - 10.1086/599549

M3 - Article

VL - 100

SP - 333

EP - 345

JO - Isis

JF - Isis

SN - 0021-1753

IS - 2

ER -