Regressing into the Right Direction: Non-contractual Claims in Proceedings between Contracting Parties under Article 7 of the Brussels Ia Regulation

Michiel Poesen* (Corresponding Author)

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This case comment addresses the interpretation of ‘matters relating to a contract’ in the EU law of civil jurisdiction, contained in the Brussels Ia Regulation. Recently, this topic received renewed attention in the Wikingerhofv.Booking.com judgment of the CJEU. More particularly, the judgment addressed whether non-contractual claims in proceedings between contracting parties can be characterized as a ‘matter relating to a contract’. This seemingly trivial question has been a recurring source of trouble in the case law of the CJEU as well as national courts. The annotation will side with the approach taken in this judgment, but criticize it for taking a long way round to settling the issue.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)390-398
Number of pages9
JournalMaastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law
Volume28
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jul 2021

Keywords

  • contract
  • tort
  • concurrent liability
  • characterization
  • adjudicative jurisdiction
  • Brussels Ia Regulation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Regressing into the Right Direction: Non-contractual Claims in Proceedings between Contracting Parties under Article 7 of the Brussels Ia Regulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this