Regulating intersectional activity: privacy and energy efficiency, laws and technology

Abbe Brown, Rónán Kennedy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Using a case study, this article explores the extent to which one area of law (privacy and data protection) can intersect with, and be challenged by, proposals by delivery of another goal – greater energy efficiency. The article then explores the extent to which these fields are becoming more integrated; and also the risks of relying on technology (notably through Privacy by Design) to do this, particularly given the uncertainties embraced by lawyers and which can be problematic to technologies. Having identified challenges in meeting both energy efficiency and privacy/data protection goals at the same time, the article develops two responses. One looks more widely in law, to competition, to prevent particular activity and to confirm the relevance of greater legal interdisciplinarity. The other is a more multi-faceted collaborative governance approach, involving legal and technical expertise and consumer perspectives, with standards having a valuable role. Addressing climate change should be an appropriate motivation to bring about this second approach, which draws on wider environmental governance developments. With largely a UK and EU focus, but seeking to be of transnational relevance, the article makes key contributions as to the capacity and limits of how law can address societal challenges; explores the risks of assuming that social and legal problems can be readily addressed by technology; confirms the need for lawyers to look to other fields of law; and assists progress in an increasingly intersectional and dynamic field.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)340-369
Number of pages30
JournalInternational Review of Law, Computers & Technology
Volume31
Issue number3
Early online date10 Sep 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Energy efficiency
privacy
data protection
Data privacy
energy
lawyer
efficiency
Law
privacy law
governance
interdisciplinarity
Climate change
expertise
climate change
EU
uncertainty
Uncertainty

Keywords

  • privacy
  • intersections
  • energy efficiency

Cite this

Regulating intersectional activity : privacy and energy efficiency, laws and technology. / Brown, Abbe; Kennedy, Rónán.

In: International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, Vol. 31, No. 3, 2017, p. 340-369.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fd90efb2eaf14e2083478dab5262f650,
title = "Regulating intersectional activity: privacy and energy efficiency, laws and technology",
abstract = "Using a case study, this article explores the extent to which one area of law (privacy and data protection) can intersect with, and be challenged by, proposals by delivery of another goal – greater energy efficiency. The article then explores the extent to which these fields are becoming more integrated; and also the risks of relying on technology (notably through Privacy by Design) to do this, particularly given the uncertainties embraced by lawyers and which can be problematic to technologies. Having identified challenges in meeting both energy efficiency and privacy/data protection goals at the same time, the article develops two responses. One looks more widely in law, to competition, to prevent particular activity and to confirm the relevance of greater legal interdisciplinarity. The other is a more multi-faceted collaborative governance approach, involving legal and technical expertise and consumer perspectives, with standards having a valuable role. Addressing climate change should be an appropriate motivation to bring about this second approach, which draws on wider environmental governance developments. With largely a UK and EU focus, but seeking to be of transnational relevance, the article makes key contributions as to the capacity and limits of how law can address societal challenges; explores the risks of assuming that social and legal problems can be readily addressed by technology; confirms the need for lawyers to look to other fields of law; and assists progress in an increasingly intersectional and dynamic field.",
keywords = "privacy, intersections, energy efficiency",
author = "Abbe Brown and R{\'o}n{\'a}n Kennedy",
note = "Funding The London workshop upon which this article builds was kindly funded by the British and Irish LawEducation and Technology Association (BILETA) 2015–2016.",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1080/13600869.2017.1371576",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "340--369",
journal = "International Review of Law, Computers & Technology",
issn = "1360-0869",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regulating intersectional activity

T2 - privacy and energy efficiency, laws and technology

AU - Brown, Abbe

AU - Kennedy, Rónán

N1 - Funding The London workshop upon which this article builds was kindly funded by the British and Irish LawEducation and Technology Association (BILETA) 2015–2016.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Using a case study, this article explores the extent to which one area of law (privacy and data protection) can intersect with, and be challenged by, proposals by delivery of another goal – greater energy efficiency. The article then explores the extent to which these fields are becoming more integrated; and also the risks of relying on technology (notably through Privacy by Design) to do this, particularly given the uncertainties embraced by lawyers and which can be problematic to technologies. Having identified challenges in meeting both energy efficiency and privacy/data protection goals at the same time, the article develops two responses. One looks more widely in law, to competition, to prevent particular activity and to confirm the relevance of greater legal interdisciplinarity. The other is a more multi-faceted collaborative governance approach, involving legal and technical expertise and consumer perspectives, with standards having a valuable role. Addressing climate change should be an appropriate motivation to bring about this second approach, which draws on wider environmental governance developments. With largely a UK and EU focus, but seeking to be of transnational relevance, the article makes key contributions as to the capacity and limits of how law can address societal challenges; explores the risks of assuming that social and legal problems can be readily addressed by technology; confirms the need for lawyers to look to other fields of law; and assists progress in an increasingly intersectional and dynamic field.

AB - Using a case study, this article explores the extent to which one area of law (privacy and data protection) can intersect with, and be challenged by, proposals by delivery of another goal – greater energy efficiency. The article then explores the extent to which these fields are becoming more integrated; and also the risks of relying on technology (notably through Privacy by Design) to do this, particularly given the uncertainties embraced by lawyers and which can be problematic to technologies. Having identified challenges in meeting both energy efficiency and privacy/data protection goals at the same time, the article develops two responses. One looks more widely in law, to competition, to prevent particular activity and to confirm the relevance of greater legal interdisciplinarity. The other is a more multi-faceted collaborative governance approach, involving legal and technical expertise and consumer perspectives, with standards having a valuable role. Addressing climate change should be an appropriate motivation to bring about this second approach, which draws on wider environmental governance developments. With largely a UK and EU focus, but seeking to be of transnational relevance, the article makes key contributions as to the capacity and limits of how law can address societal challenges; explores the risks of assuming that social and legal problems can be readily addressed by technology; confirms the need for lawyers to look to other fields of law; and assists progress in an increasingly intersectional and dynamic field.

KW - privacy

KW - intersections

KW - energy efficiency

U2 - 10.1080/13600869.2017.1371576

DO - 10.1080/13600869.2017.1371576

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 340

EP - 369

JO - International Review of Law, Computers & Technology

JF - International Review of Law, Computers & Technology

SN - 1360-0869

IS - 3

ER -