Relational discrepancies and emotion: The moderating roles of relationship type and relational discrepancy valence

Jennifer M. Boldero, Garry L. Robins, Benedict J. Williams, Jillian Francis, Anne Hampton, Annabelle J. Fourie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Relational discrepancy theory proposes that discrepancies in the extents to which relational partners meet relational standards are associated with emotions and that perceiving relationships in specified ways moderates associations. In a range of relationships, ideal relational discrepancies were associated with dejection and ought relational discrepancies with agitation (Study 1), associations moderated by relationship type. Discrepancy valence also moderated ideal discrepancy associations. Similar associations were found in friendships, moderated by relationship type (Study 2). Finally, relationship type and valence moderated associations in relationships with supervisors but not with colleagues (Study 3). These results support relational discrepancy theory propositions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)259-273
Number of pages15
JournalAsian Journal of Social Psychology
Volume12
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2009

Keywords

  • discrepancy valence
  • emotion
  • relational discrepancies
  • relationship type
  • CLOSE RELATIONSHIPS
  • SELF-DISCREPANCIES
  • IDEALS
  • FOCUS

Cite this

Relational discrepancies and emotion : The moderating roles of relationship type and relational discrepancy valence. / Boldero, Jennifer M.; Robins, Garry L.; Williams, Benedict J.; Francis, Jillian; Hampton, Anne; Fourie, Annabelle J.

In: Asian Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 12, No. 4, 12.2009, p. 259-273.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Boldero, Jennifer M. ; Robins, Garry L. ; Williams, Benedict J. ; Francis, Jillian ; Hampton, Anne ; Fourie, Annabelle J. / Relational discrepancies and emotion : The moderating roles of relationship type and relational discrepancy valence. In: Asian Journal of Social Psychology. 2009 ; Vol. 12, No. 4. pp. 259-273.
@article{81d7f30fdce641888c33960c8fcdb45a,
title = "Relational discrepancies and emotion: The moderating roles of relationship type and relational discrepancy valence",
abstract = "Relational discrepancy theory proposes that discrepancies in the extents to which relational partners meet relational standards are associated with emotions and that perceiving relationships in specified ways moderates associations. In a range of relationships, ideal relational discrepancies were associated with dejection and ought relational discrepancies with agitation (Study 1), associations moderated by relationship type. Discrepancy valence also moderated ideal discrepancy associations. Similar associations were found in friendships, moderated by relationship type (Study 2). Finally, relationship type and valence moderated associations in relationships with supervisors but not with colleagues (Study 3). These results support relational discrepancy theory propositions.",
keywords = "discrepancy valence, emotion, relational discrepancies, relationship type, CLOSE RELATIONSHIPS, SELF-DISCREPANCIES, IDEALS, FOCUS",
author = "Boldero, {Jennifer M.} and Robins, {Garry L.} and Williams, {Benedict J.} and Jillian Francis and Anne Hampton and Fourie, {Annabelle J.}",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-839X.2009.01290.x",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "259--273",
journal = "Asian Journal of Social Psychology",
issn = "1367-2223",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relational discrepancies and emotion

T2 - The moderating roles of relationship type and relational discrepancy valence

AU - Boldero, Jennifer M.

AU - Robins, Garry L.

AU - Williams, Benedict J.

AU - Francis, Jillian

AU - Hampton, Anne

AU - Fourie, Annabelle J.

PY - 2009/12

Y1 - 2009/12

N2 - Relational discrepancy theory proposes that discrepancies in the extents to which relational partners meet relational standards are associated with emotions and that perceiving relationships in specified ways moderates associations. In a range of relationships, ideal relational discrepancies were associated with dejection and ought relational discrepancies with agitation (Study 1), associations moderated by relationship type. Discrepancy valence also moderated ideal discrepancy associations. Similar associations were found in friendships, moderated by relationship type (Study 2). Finally, relationship type and valence moderated associations in relationships with supervisors but not with colleagues (Study 3). These results support relational discrepancy theory propositions.

AB - Relational discrepancy theory proposes that discrepancies in the extents to which relational partners meet relational standards are associated with emotions and that perceiving relationships in specified ways moderates associations. In a range of relationships, ideal relational discrepancies were associated with dejection and ought relational discrepancies with agitation (Study 1), associations moderated by relationship type. Discrepancy valence also moderated ideal discrepancy associations. Similar associations were found in friendships, moderated by relationship type (Study 2). Finally, relationship type and valence moderated associations in relationships with supervisors but not with colleagues (Study 3). These results support relational discrepancy theory propositions.

KW - discrepancy valence

KW - emotion

KW - relational discrepancies

KW - relationship type

KW - CLOSE RELATIONSHIPS

KW - SELF-DISCREPANCIES

KW - IDEALS

KW - FOCUS

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-839X.2009.01290.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-839X.2009.01290.x

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 259

EP - 273

JO - Asian Journal of Social Psychology

JF - Asian Journal of Social Psychology

SN - 1367-2223

IS - 4

ER -