Relationship of maximum strength to weightlifting performance

M. H. Stone, W. A. Sands, K. C. Pierce, J. Carlock, Marco Cardinale, R. U. Newton

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    54 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Purpose: The primary objective was to assess the relationship of maximum strength to weightlifting ability using established scaling methods. The secondary objective was to compare men and women weightlifters on strength and weightlifting ability. Methods: Two correlational observations were carried out using Pearson's r. In the first observation (N = 65) the relationship of dynamic maximum strength (one-repetition maximum (I RM) squat) was compared with weightlifting ability; in the second observation (N = 16), isometric maximum strength (midthigh pull) was studied. Scaling methods for equating maximum strength and weightlifting results were used (load (.) (Ht(2.16))(-1), load (.) kg(-1), load (.) lbm(-1), allometric, and Sinclair formula) to assess the association between measures of maximum strength and weightlifting performance. Results: Using scaled values; correlations between maximum strength and weightlifting results were generally strong in both observations (e.g., using allometric scaling for the IRM squat vs the IRM snatch: r = 0.84, N = 65). Men were stronger than women (e.g., IRM squat, N = 65: men = 188.1 +/- 48.6 kg; women = 126.7 +/- 28.3 kg); differences generally held when scaling was applied (e.g., I RM squat scaled with the Sinclair formula: men = 224.7 +/- 36.5 kg; women = 144.2 +/- 25.4 kg). Conclusions: When collectively considering scaling methods, maximum strength is strongly related to weightlifting performance independent of body mass and height differences. Furthermore, men are stronger than women even when body mass and height are obviated by scaling methods.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1037-1043
    Number of pages6
    JournalMedicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
    Volume37
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2005

    Keywords

    • weightlifting
    • strength
    • men
    • women
    • BODY-WEIGHT
    • POWER
    • LOAD

    Cite this

    Stone, M. H., Sands, W. A., Pierce, K. C., Carlock, J., Cardinale, M., & Newton, R. U. (2005). Relationship of maximum strength to weightlifting performance. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 37(6), 1037-1043. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000171621.45134.10

    Relationship of maximum strength to weightlifting performance. / Stone, M. H.; Sands, W. A.; Pierce, K. C.; Carlock, J.; Cardinale, Marco; Newton, R. U.

    In: Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, Vol. 37, No. 6, 06.2005, p. 1037-1043.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Stone, MH, Sands, WA, Pierce, KC, Carlock, J, Cardinale, M & Newton, RU 2005, 'Relationship of maximum strength to weightlifting performance', Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1037-1043. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000171621.45134.10
    Stone, M. H. ; Sands, W. A. ; Pierce, K. C. ; Carlock, J. ; Cardinale, Marco ; Newton, R. U. / Relationship of maximum strength to weightlifting performance. In: Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2005 ; Vol. 37, No. 6. pp. 1037-1043.
    @article{ca5c81638ef146648a963fa1b43e8c28,
    title = "Relationship of maximum strength to weightlifting performance",
    abstract = "Purpose: The primary objective was to assess the relationship of maximum strength to weightlifting ability using established scaling methods. The secondary objective was to compare men and women weightlifters on strength and weightlifting ability. Methods: Two correlational observations were carried out using Pearson's r. In the first observation (N = 65) the relationship of dynamic maximum strength (one-repetition maximum (I RM) squat) was compared with weightlifting ability; in the second observation (N = 16), isometric maximum strength (midthigh pull) was studied. Scaling methods for equating maximum strength and weightlifting results were used (load (.) (Ht(2.16))(-1), load (.) kg(-1), load (.) lbm(-1), allometric, and Sinclair formula) to assess the association between measures of maximum strength and weightlifting performance. Results: Using scaled values; correlations between maximum strength and weightlifting results were generally strong in both observations (e.g., using allometric scaling for the IRM squat vs the IRM snatch: r = 0.84, N = 65). Men were stronger than women (e.g., IRM squat, N = 65: men = 188.1 +/- 48.6 kg; women = 126.7 +/- 28.3 kg); differences generally held when scaling was applied (e.g., I RM squat scaled with the Sinclair formula: men = 224.7 +/- 36.5 kg; women = 144.2 +/- 25.4 kg). Conclusions: When collectively considering scaling methods, maximum strength is strongly related to weightlifting performance independent of body mass and height differences. Furthermore, men are stronger than women even when body mass and height are obviated by scaling methods.",
    keywords = "weightlifting, strength, men, women, BODY-WEIGHT, POWER, LOAD",
    author = "Stone, {M. H.} and Sands, {W. A.} and Pierce, {K. C.} and J. Carlock and Marco Cardinale and Newton, {R. U.}",
    year = "2005",
    month = "6",
    doi = "10.1249/01.MSS.0000171621.45134.10",
    language = "English",
    volume = "37",
    pages = "1037--1043",
    journal = "Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise",
    issn = "0195-9131",
    publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
    number = "6",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Relationship of maximum strength to weightlifting performance

    AU - Stone, M. H.

    AU - Sands, W. A.

    AU - Pierce, K. C.

    AU - Carlock, J.

    AU - Cardinale, Marco

    AU - Newton, R. U.

    PY - 2005/6

    Y1 - 2005/6

    N2 - Purpose: The primary objective was to assess the relationship of maximum strength to weightlifting ability using established scaling methods. The secondary objective was to compare men and women weightlifters on strength and weightlifting ability. Methods: Two correlational observations were carried out using Pearson's r. In the first observation (N = 65) the relationship of dynamic maximum strength (one-repetition maximum (I RM) squat) was compared with weightlifting ability; in the second observation (N = 16), isometric maximum strength (midthigh pull) was studied. Scaling methods for equating maximum strength and weightlifting results were used (load (.) (Ht(2.16))(-1), load (.) kg(-1), load (.) lbm(-1), allometric, and Sinclair formula) to assess the association between measures of maximum strength and weightlifting performance. Results: Using scaled values; correlations between maximum strength and weightlifting results were generally strong in both observations (e.g., using allometric scaling for the IRM squat vs the IRM snatch: r = 0.84, N = 65). Men were stronger than women (e.g., IRM squat, N = 65: men = 188.1 +/- 48.6 kg; women = 126.7 +/- 28.3 kg); differences generally held when scaling was applied (e.g., I RM squat scaled with the Sinclair formula: men = 224.7 +/- 36.5 kg; women = 144.2 +/- 25.4 kg). Conclusions: When collectively considering scaling methods, maximum strength is strongly related to weightlifting performance independent of body mass and height differences. Furthermore, men are stronger than women even when body mass and height are obviated by scaling methods.

    AB - Purpose: The primary objective was to assess the relationship of maximum strength to weightlifting ability using established scaling methods. The secondary objective was to compare men and women weightlifters on strength and weightlifting ability. Methods: Two correlational observations were carried out using Pearson's r. In the first observation (N = 65) the relationship of dynamic maximum strength (one-repetition maximum (I RM) squat) was compared with weightlifting ability; in the second observation (N = 16), isometric maximum strength (midthigh pull) was studied. Scaling methods for equating maximum strength and weightlifting results were used (load (.) (Ht(2.16))(-1), load (.) kg(-1), load (.) lbm(-1), allometric, and Sinclair formula) to assess the association between measures of maximum strength and weightlifting performance. Results: Using scaled values; correlations between maximum strength and weightlifting results were generally strong in both observations (e.g., using allometric scaling for the IRM squat vs the IRM snatch: r = 0.84, N = 65). Men were stronger than women (e.g., IRM squat, N = 65: men = 188.1 +/- 48.6 kg; women = 126.7 +/- 28.3 kg); differences generally held when scaling was applied (e.g., I RM squat scaled with the Sinclair formula: men = 224.7 +/- 36.5 kg; women = 144.2 +/- 25.4 kg). Conclusions: When collectively considering scaling methods, maximum strength is strongly related to weightlifting performance independent of body mass and height differences. Furthermore, men are stronger than women even when body mass and height are obviated by scaling methods.

    KW - weightlifting

    KW - strength

    KW - men

    KW - women

    KW - BODY-WEIGHT

    KW - POWER

    KW - LOAD

    U2 - 10.1249/01.MSS.0000171621.45134.10

    DO - 10.1249/01.MSS.0000171621.45134.10

    M3 - Article

    VL - 37

    SP - 1037

    EP - 1043

    JO - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

    JF - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

    SN - 0195-9131

    IS - 6

    ER -