Remediating doctors' performance to restore patient safety: a realist review protocol

Tristan Price, Nicola Brennan, Jennifer Cleland, Linda Prescott-Clements, Amanda Wanner, Lyndsey Withers, Geoff Wong, Julian Archer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Underperformance by doctors poses a risk to patient safety. Remediation is an intervention designed to remedy underperformance and return a doctor to safe practice. Remediation is widely used across healthcare systems globally, and has clear implications for both patient safety and doctor retention. Yet, there is a poor evidence base to inform remediation programmes. In particular, there is a lack of understanding as to why and how a remedial intervention may work to change a doctor's practice. The aim of this research is to identify why, how, in what contexts, for whom and to what extent remediation programmes for practising doctors work to support patient safety.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Realist review is an approach to evidence synthesis that seeks to develop programme theories about how an intervention works to produce its effects. The initial search strategy will involve: database and grey literature searching, citation searching and contacting authors. The evidence search will be extended as the review progresses and becomes more focused on the development of specific aspects of the programme theory. The development of the programme theory will involve input from a stakeholder group consisting of professional experts in the remediation process and patient representatives. Evidence synthesis will use a realist logic of analysis to interrogate data in order to develop and refine the initial programme theory into a more definitive realist programme theory of how remediation works. The study will follow and be reported according to Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses-Evolving Standards (RAMESES).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required. Our dissemination strategy will include input from our stakeholder group. Customised outputs will be developed using the knowledge-to-action cycle framework, and will be targeted to: policy-makers; education providers and regulators, the National Health Service, doctors and academics.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018088779.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e025943
JournalBMJ Open
Volume8
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Oct 2018

Fingerprint

Patient Safety
Literature
Patient Advocacy
Program Development
National Health Programs
Administrative Personnel
Ethics
Databases
Delivery of Health Care
Education
Research

Keywords

  • medical performance
  • patient safety
  • remediation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Price, T., Brennan, N., Cleland, J., Prescott-Clements, L., Wanner, A., Withers, L., ... Archer, J. (2018). Remediating doctors' performance to restore patient safety: a realist review protocol. BMJ Open, 8(10), e025943. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025943

Remediating doctors' performance to restore patient safety : a realist review protocol. / Price, Tristan; Brennan, Nicola; Cleland, Jennifer; Prescott-Clements, Linda; Wanner, Amanda; Withers, Lyndsey; Wong, Geoff; Archer, Julian.

In: BMJ Open, Vol. 8, No. 10, 28.10.2018, p. e025943.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Price, T, Brennan, N, Cleland, J, Prescott-Clements, L, Wanner, A, Withers, L, Wong, G & Archer, J 2018, 'Remediating doctors' performance to restore patient safety: a realist review protocol' BMJ Open, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. e025943. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025943
Price T, Brennan N, Cleland J, Prescott-Clements L, Wanner A, Withers L et al. Remediating doctors' performance to restore patient safety: a realist review protocol. BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 28;8(10):e025943. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025943
Price, Tristan ; Brennan, Nicola ; Cleland, Jennifer ; Prescott-Clements, Linda ; Wanner, Amanda ; Withers, Lyndsey ; Wong, Geoff ; Archer, Julian. / Remediating doctors' performance to restore patient safety : a realist review protocol. In: BMJ Open. 2018 ; Vol. 8, No. 10. pp. e025943.
@article{6e583b33723d43e486be73ffa28f28de,
title = "Remediating doctors' performance to restore patient safety: a realist review protocol",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION: Underperformance by doctors poses a risk to patient safety. Remediation is an intervention designed to remedy underperformance and return a doctor to safe practice. Remediation is widely used across healthcare systems globally, and has clear implications for both patient safety and doctor retention. Yet, there is a poor evidence base to inform remediation programmes. In particular, there is a lack of understanding as to why and how a remedial intervention may work to change a doctor's practice. The aim of this research is to identify why, how, in what contexts, for whom and to what extent remediation programmes for practising doctors work to support patient safety.METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Realist review is an approach to evidence synthesis that seeks to develop programme theories about how an intervention works to produce its effects. The initial search strategy will involve: database and grey literature searching, citation searching and contacting authors. The evidence search will be extended as the review progresses and becomes more focused on the development of specific aspects of the programme theory. The development of the programme theory will involve input from a stakeholder group consisting of professional experts in the remediation process and patient representatives. Evidence synthesis will use a realist logic of analysis to interrogate data in order to develop and refine the initial programme theory into a more definitive realist programme theory of how remediation works. The study will follow and be reported according to Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses-Evolving Standards (RAMESES).ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required. Our dissemination strategy will include input from our stakeholder group. Customised outputs will be developed using the knowledge-to-action cycle framework, and will be targeted to: policy-makers; education providers and regulators, the National Health Service, doctors and academics.PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018088779.",
keywords = "medical performance, patient safety, remediation",
author = "Tristan Price and Nicola Brennan and Jennifer Cleland and Linda Prescott-Clements and Amanda Wanner and Lyndsey Withers and Geoff Wong and Julian Archer",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025943",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "e025943",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Remediating doctors' performance to restore patient safety

T2 - a realist review protocol

AU - Price, Tristan

AU - Brennan, Nicola

AU - Cleland, Jennifer

AU - Prescott-Clements, Linda

AU - Wanner, Amanda

AU - Withers, Lyndsey

AU - Wong, Geoff

AU - Archer, Julian

PY - 2018/10/28

Y1 - 2018/10/28

N2 - INTRODUCTION: Underperformance by doctors poses a risk to patient safety. Remediation is an intervention designed to remedy underperformance and return a doctor to safe practice. Remediation is widely used across healthcare systems globally, and has clear implications for both patient safety and doctor retention. Yet, there is a poor evidence base to inform remediation programmes. In particular, there is a lack of understanding as to why and how a remedial intervention may work to change a doctor's practice. The aim of this research is to identify why, how, in what contexts, for whom and to what extent remediation programmes for practising doctors work to support patient safety.METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Realist review is an approach to evidence synthesis that seeks to develop programme theories about how an intervention works to produce its effects. The initial search strategy will involve: database and grey literature searching, citation searching and contacting authors. The evidence search will be extended as the review progresses and becomes more focused on the development of specific aspects of the programme theory. The development of the programme theory will involve input from a stakeholder group consisting of professional experts in the remediation process and patient representatives. Evidence synthesis will use a realist logic of analysis to interrogate data in order to develop and refine the initial programme theory into a more definitive realist programme theory of how remediation works. The study will follow and be reported according to Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses-Evolving Standards (RAMESES).ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required. Our dissemination strategy will include input from our stakeholder group. Customised outputs will be developed using the knowledge-to-action cycle framework, and will be targeted to: policy-makers; education providers and regulators, the National Health Service, doctors and academics.PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018088779.

AB - INTRODUCTION: Underperformance by doctors poses a risk to patient safety. Remediation is an intervention designed to remedy underperformance and return a doctor to safe practice. Remediation is widely used across healthcare systems globally, and has clear implications for both patient safety and doctor retention. Yet, there is a poor evidence base to inform remediation programmes. In particular, there is a lack of understanding as to why and how a remedial intervention may work to change a doctor's practice. The aim of this research is to identify why, how, in what contexts, for whom and to what extent remediation programmes for practising doctors work to support patient safety.METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Realist review is an approach to evidence synthesis that seeks to develop programme theories about how an intervention works to produce its effects. The initial search strategy will involve: database and grey literature searching, citation searching and contacting authors. The evidence search will be extended as the review progresses and becomes more focused on the development of specific aspects of the programme theory. The development of the programme theory will involve input from a stakeholder group consisting of professional experts in the remediation process and patient representatives. Evidence synthesis will use a realist logic of analysis to interrogate data in order to develop and refine the initial programme theory into a more definitive realist programme theory of how remediation works. The study will follow and be reported according to Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses-Evolving Standards (RAMESES).ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required. Our dissemination strategy will include input from our stakeholder group. Customised outputs will be developed using the knowledge-to-action cycle framework, and will be targeted to: policy-makers; education providers and regulators, the National Health Service, doctors and academics.PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018088779.

KW - medical performance

KW - patient safety

KW - remediation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055616676&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025943

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025943

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - e025943

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 10

ER -