Removing financial barriers to access reproductive, maternal and newborn health services

the challenges and policy implications for human resources for health

Barbara McPake, Sophie Witter, Tim Ensor, Suzanne Fustukian, David Newlands, Tim Martineau, Yotamu Chirwa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background
The last decade has seen widespread retreat from user fees with the intention to reduce financial constraints to users in accessing health care and in particular improving access to reproductive, maternal and newborn health services. This has had important benefits in reducing financial barriers to access in a number of settings. If the policies work as intended, service utilization rates increase. However this increases workloads for health staff and at the same time, the loss of user fee revenues can imply that health workers lose bonuses or allowances, or that it becomes more difficult to ensure uninterrupted supplies of health care inputs.

This research aimed to assess how policies reducing demand-side barriers to access to health care have affected service delivery with a particular focus on human resources for health.

Methods
We undertook case studies in five countries (Ghana, Nepal, Sierra Leone, Zambia and Zimbabwe). In each we reviewed financing and HRH policies, considered the impact financing policy change had made on health service utilization rates, analysed the distribution of health staff and their actual and potential workloads, and compared remuneration terms in the public sectors.

Results
We question a number of common assumptions about the financing and human resource inter-relationships. The impact of fee removal on utilization levels is mostly not sustained or supported by all the evidence. Shortages of human resources for health at the national level are not universal; maldistribution within countries is the greater problem. Low salaries are not universal; most of the countries pay health workers well by national benchmarks.

Conclusions
The interconnectedness between user fee policy and HRH situations proves difficult to assess. Many policies have been changing over the relevant period, some clearly and others possibly in response to problems identified associated with financing policy change. Other relevant variables have also changed.

However, as is now well-recognised in the user fee literature, co-ordination of health financing and human resource policies is essential. This appears less well recognised in the human resources literature. This coordination involves considering user charges, resource availability at health facility level, health worker pay, terms and conditions, and recruitment in tandem. All these policies need to be effectively monitored in their processes as well as outcomes, but sufficient data are not collected for this purpose.
Original languageEnglish
Article number46
JournalHuman Resources for Health
Volume11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Sep 2013

Fingerprint

Maternal Health Services
Health Resources
Reproductive Health
Health Policy
human resources
health service
Fees and Charges
fee
health
financial management
utilization
Health
health care
Workload
worker
workload
Sierra Leone
Healthcare Financing
Remuneration
staff

Keywords

  • user fees
  • human resources for health
  • policy co-ordination
  • distribution
  • workload
  • pay

Cite this

Removing financial barriers to access reproductive, maternal and newborn health services : the challenges and policy implications for human resources for health. / McPake, Barbara; Witter, Sophie; Ensor, Tim; Fustukian, Suzanne; Newlands, David; Martineau, Tim; Chirwa, Yotamu.

In: Human Resources for Health, Vol. 11, 46, 22.09.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McPake, Barbara ; Witter, Sophie ; Ensor, Tim ; Fustukian, Suzanne ; Newlands, David ; Martineau, Tim ; Chirwa, Yotamu. / Removing financial barriers to access reproductive, maternal and newborn health services : the challenges and policy implications for human resources for health. In: Human Resources for Health. 2013 ; Vol. 11.
@article{3e20e2e4328641b8aa15607303f584ab,
title = "Removing financial barriers to access reproductive, maternal and newborn health services: the challenges and policy implications for human resources for health",
abstract = "BackgroundThe last decade has seen widespread retreat from user fees with the intention to reduce financial constraints to users in accessing health care and in particular improving access to reproductive, maternal and newborn health services. This has had important benefits in reducing financial barriers to access in a number of settings. If the policies work as intended, service utilization rates increase. However this increases workloads for health staff and at the same time, the loss of user fee revenues can imply that health workers lose bonuses or allowances, or that it becomes more difficult to ensure uninterrupted supplies of health care inputs.This research aimed to assess how policies reducing demand-side barriers to access to health care have affected service delivery with a particular focus on human resources for health.MethodsWe undertook case studies in five countries (Ghana, Nepal, Sierra Leone, Zambia and Zimbabwe). In each we reviewed financing and HRH policies, considered the impact financing policy change had made on health service utilization rates, analysed the distribution of health staff and their actual and potential workloads, and compared remuneration terms in the public sectors.ResultsWe question a number of common assumptions about the financing and human resource inter-relationships. The impact of fee removal on utilization levels is mostly not sustained or supported by all the evidence. Shortages of human resources for health at the national level are not universal; maldistribution within countries is the greater problem. Low salaries are not universal; most of the countries pay health workers well by national benchmarks.ConclusionsThe interconnectedness between user fee policy and HRH situations proves difficult to assess. Many policies have been changing over the relevant period, some clearly and others possibly in response to problems identified associated with financing policy change. Other relevant variables have also changed.However, as is now well-recognised in the user fee literature, co-ordination of health financing and human resource policies is essential. This appears less well recognised in the human resources literature. This coordination involves considering user charges, resource availability at health facility level, health worker pay, terms and conditions, and recruitment in tandem. All these policies need to be effectively monitored in their processes as well as outcomes, but sufficient data are not collected for this purpose.",
keywords = "user fees, human resources for health, policy co-ordination, distribution, workload, pay",
author = "Barbara McPake and Sophie Witter and Tim Ensor and Suzanne Fustukian and David Newlands and Tim Martineau and Yotamu Chirwa",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1186/1478-4491-11-46",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "Human Resources for Health",
issn = "1478-4491",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Removing financial barriers to access reproductive, maternal and newborn health services

T2 - the challenges and policy implications for human resources for health

AU - McPake, Barbara

AU - Witter, Sophie

AU - Ensor, Tim

AU - Fustukian, Suzanne

AU - Newlands, David

AU - Martineau, Tim

AU - Chirwa, Yotamu

PY - 2013/9/22

Y1 - 2013/9/22

N2 - BackgroundThe last decade has seen widespread retreat from user fees with the intention to reduce financial constraints to users in accessing health care and in particular improving access to reproductive, maternal and newborn health services. This has had important benefits in reducing financial barriers to access in a number of settings. If the policies work as intended, service utilization rates increase. However this increases workloads for health staff and at the same time, the loss of user fee revenues can imply that health workers lose bonuses or allowances, or that it becomes more difficult to ensure uninterrupted supplies of health care inputs.This research aimed to assess how policies reducing demand-side barriers to access to health care have affected service delivery with a particular focus on human resources for health.MethodsWe undertook case studies in five countries (Ghana, Nepal, Sierra Leone, Zambia and Zimbabwe). In each we reviewed financing and HRH policies, considered the impact financing policy change had made on health service utilization rates, analysed the distribution of health staff and their actual and potential workloads, and compared remuneration terms in the public sectors.ResultsWe question a number of common assumptions about the financing and human resource inter-relationships. The impact of fee removal on utilization levels is mostly not sustained or supported by all the evidence. Shortages of human resources for health at the national level are not universal; maldistribution within countries is the greater problem. Low salaries are not universal; most of the countries pay health workers well by national benchmarks.ConclusionsThe interconnectedness between user fee policy and HRH situations proves difficult to assess. Many policies have been changing over the relevant period, some clearly and others possibly in response to problems identified associated with financing policy change. Other relevant variables have also changed.However, as is now well-recognised in the user fee literature, co-ordination of health financing and human resource policies is essential. This appears less well recognised in the human resources literature. This coordination involves considering user charges, resource availability at health facility level, health worker pay, terms and conditions, and recruitment in tandem. All these policies need to be effectively monitored in their processes as well as outcomes, but sufficient data are not collected for this purpose.

AB - BackgroundThe last decade has seen widespread retreat from user fees with the intention to reduce financial constraints to users in accessing health care and in particular improving access to reproductive, maternal and newborn health services. This has had important benefits in reducing financial barriers to access in a number of settings. If the policies work as intended, service utilization rates increase. However this increases workloads for health staff and at the same time, the loss of user fee revenues can imply that health workers lose bonuses or allowances, or that it becomes more difficult to ensure uninterrupted supplies of health care inputs.This research aimed to assess how policies reducing demand-side barriers to access to health care have affected service delivery with a particular focus on human resources for health.MethodsWe undertook case studies in five countries (Ghana, Nepal, Sierra Leone, Zambia and Zimbabwe). In each we reviewed financing and HRH policies, considered the impact financing policy change had made on health service utilization rates, analysed the distribution of health staff and their actual and potential workloads, and compared remuneration terms in the public sectors.ResultsWe question a number of common assumptions about the financing and human resource inter-relationships. The impact of fee removal on utilization levels is mostly not sustained or supported by all the evidence. Shortages of human resources for health at the national level are not universal; maldistribution within countries is the greater problem. Low salaries are not universal; most of the countries pay health workers well by national benchmarks.ConclusionsThe interconnectedness between user fee policy and HRH situations proves difficult to assess. Many policies have been changing over the relevant period, some clearly and others possibly in response to problems identified associated with financing policy change. Other relevant variables have also changed.However, as is now well-recognised in the user fee literature, co-ordination of health financing and human resource policies is essential. This appears less well recognised in the human resources literature. This coordination involves considering user charges, resource availability at health facility level, health worker pay, terms and conditions, and recruitment in tandem. All these policies need to be effectively monitored in their processes as well as outcomes, but sufficient data are not collected for this purpose.

KW - user fees

KW - human resources for health

KW - policy co-ordination

KW - distribution

KW - workload

KW - pay

U2 - 10.1186/1478-4491-11-46

DO - 10.1186/1478-4491-11-46

M3 - Article

VL - 11

JO - Human Resources for Health

JF - Human Resources for Health

SN - 1478-4491

M1 - 46

ER -