Renewable financial support systems and cost-effectiveness

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper analyses the performance of ‘market-based’ and ‘feed-in tariff’ systems of renewable energy procurement, and comments on the impact of different procurement systems on investment in renewable energy. The ‘market-based’ British Renewables Obligation (RO) is not more cost-effective compared to the German feed in tariff. Although the nominal rates of payment per kWh of renewable energy are higher in Germany, this is more than offset by lower wind speeds in Germany producing a lower return on investment compared to the UK. A harmonised, EU-wide market-based system, would not improve cost-effectiveness, and may serve to reduce, rather than increase, local investment in renewable energy. On the other hand, nationally based green electricity certificate systems like the RO are not intrinsically biased against locally owned or co-operative ventures. Systems are needed which encourage a diversity of investment in renewable energy from local as well as institutional sources.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)280-287
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Cleaner Production
Volume15
Issue number3
Early online date5 May 2006
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Fingerprint

Cost effectiveness
cost
energy
market
Electricity
electricity
wind velocity
Renewable energy
Cost-effectiveness
Financial support
Costs
tariff
Procurement
Obligation
Tariffs
Germany

Keywords

  • green electricity certificates
  • feed-in tariffs
  • investment

Cite this

Renewable financial support systems and cost-effectiveness. / Toke, David.

In: Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2007, p. 280-287.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{24fa752ca36f45839c7ef4d86d8b7652,
title = "Renewable financial support systems and cost-effectiveness",
abstract = "This paper analyses the performance of ‘market-based’ and ‘feed-in tariff’ systems of renewable energy procurement, and comments on the impact of different procurement systems on investment in renewable energy. The ‘market-based’ British Renewables Obligation (RO) is not more cost-effective compared to the German feed in tariff. Although the nominal rates of payment per kWh of renewable energy are higher in Germany, this is more than offset by lower wind speeds in Germany producing a lower return on investment compared to the UK. A harmonised, EU-wide market-based system, would not improve cost-effectiveness, and may serve to reduce, rather than increase, local investment in renewable energy. On the other hand, nationally based green electricity certificate systems like the RO are not intrinsically biased against locally owned or co-operative ventures. Systems are needed which encourage a diversity of investment in renewable energy from local as well as institutional sources.",
keywords = "green electricity certificates, feed-in tariffs, investment",
author = "David Toke",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.02.005",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "280--287",
journal = "Journal of Cleaner Production",
issn = "0959-6526",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Renewable financial support systems and cost-effectiveness

AU - Toke, David

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - This paper analyses the performance of ‘market-based’ and ‘feed-in tariff’ systems of renewable energy procurement, and comments on the impact of different procurement systems on investment in renewable energy. The ‘market-based’ British Renewables Obligation (RO) is not more cost-effective compared to the German feed in tariff. Although the nominal rates of payment per kWh of renewable energy are higher in Germany, this is more than offset by lower wind speeds in Germany producing a lower return on investment compared to the UK. A harmonised, EU-wide market-based system, would not improve cost-effectiveness, and may serve to reduce, rather than increase, local investment in renewable energy. On the other hand, nationally based green electricity certificate systems like the RO are not intrinsically biased against locally owned or co-operative ventures. Systems are needed which encourage a diversity of investment in renewable energy from local as well as institutional sources.

AB - This paper analyses the performance of ‘market-based’ and ‘feed-in tariff’ systems of renewable energy procurement, and comments on the impact of different procurement systems on investment in renewable energy. The ‘market-based’ British Renewables Obligation (RO) is not more cost-effective compared to the German feed in tariff. Although the nominal rates of payment per kWh of renewable energy are higher in Germany, this is more than offset by lower wind speeds in Germany producing a lower return on investment compared to the UK. A harmonised, EU-wide market-based system, would not improve cost-effectiveness, and may serve to reduce, rather than increase, local investment in renewable energy. On the other hand, nationally based green electricity certificate systems like the RO are not intrinsically biased against locally owned or co-operative ventures. Systems are needed which encourage a diversity of investment in renewable energy from local as well as institutional sources.

KW - green electricity certificates

KW - feed-in tariffs

KW - investment

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.02.005

DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.02.005

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 280

EP - 287

JO - Journal of Cleaner Production

JF - Journal of Cleaner Production

SN - 0959-6526

IS - 3

ER -