Repeatability of SphygmoCor pulse wave analysis in assessing arterial wave reflection in pregnancy using applanation tonometry

Michael A. Crilly*, Kirsty M. Orme, Joan Henderson, Angela J. Allan, Sohinee Bhattacharya

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To estimate clinical agreement in relation to measuring aortic augmentation index (AIX-75) in pregnancy in a routine clinical setting. Methods: A hospital-based clinical agreement study of 20 women in which two trained nurses alternated in measuring arterial function (AIX standardized to a heart rate of 75 beats-per-minute, AIX-75) on a single occasion in triplicate, after participants had rested semi-recumbent for 15 min. Right brachial blood pressure (BP) was measured using the Microlife 3BTO-A oscillometric device. Radial applanation pulse wave analysis (PWA) was undertaken according to current guidelines using the SphygmoCor device with a hand-held Millar tonometer applanated at the right radial artery. Each nurse was blinded to others PWA results. Observer agreement was assessed using the Bland-Altman "limits of agreement" (LOA, mean difference ±2 SD) approach. Results: Median gestation was 37 weeks (range: 12-42), mean age 31 years, 30% nulliparous, mean brachial BP 128/79 mm Hg. Based on all six PWA measurements, mean AIX-75 was 11.7 (range: -18 to +35). The between-observer LOA was 0.1 ± 11.0 and the within-observer LOA's were 1 ± 10 and -2 ± 8 for the two nurses. Observer differences did not vary systematically with the magnitude of AIX-75. Conclusion: AIX-75 can be measured by nurses using PWA in pregnancy with a high level of observer agreement.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)322-332
Number of pages11
JournalHypertension in Pregnancy
Volume33
Issue number3
Early online date29 Jan 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2014

Fingerprint

Pulse Wave Analysis
Manometry
Nurses
Pregnancy
Arm
Blood Pressure
Equipment and Supplies
Radial Artery
Hand
Heart Rate
Guidelines

Keywords

  • pulse wave analysis
  • augmentation index
  • pregnancy
  • agreement
  • repeatability
  • reliability
  • central hemodynamics
  • stiffness
  • pressure
  • preeclampsia
  • prediction
  • validation
  • velocity
  • device

Cite this

Repeatability of SphygmoCor pulse wave analysis in assessing arterial wave reflection in pregnancy using applanation tonometry. / Crilly, Michael A.; Orme, Kirsty M.; Henderson, Joan; Allan, Angela J.; Bhattacharya, Sohinee.

In: Hypertension in Pregnancy, Vol. 33, No. 3, 08.2014, p. 322-332.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Crilly, Michael A. ; Orme, Kirsty M. ; Henderson, Joan ; Allan, Angela J. ; Bhattacharya, Sohinee. / Repeatability of SphygmoCor pulse wave analysis in assessing arterial wave reflection in pregnancy using applanation tonometry. In: Hypertension in Pregnancy. 2014 ; Vol. 33, No. 3. pp. 322-332.
@article{3f575f9658b94f93b65987a33e919437,
title = "Repeatability of SphygmoCor pulse wave analysis in assessing arterial wave reflection in pregnancy using applanation tonometry",
abstract = "Objective: To estimate clinical agreement in relation to measuring aortic augmentation index (AIX-75) in pregnancy in a routine clinical setting. Methods: A hospital-based clinical agreement study of 20 women in which two trained nurses alternated in measuring arterial function (AIX standardized to a heart rate of 75 beats-per-minute, AIX-75) on a single occasion in triplicate, after participants had rested semi-recumbent for 15 min. Right brachial blood pressure (BP) was measured using the Microlife 3BTO-A oscillometric device. Radial applanation pulse wave analysis (PWA) was undertaken according to current guidelines using the SphygmoCor device with a hand-held Millar tonometer applanated at the right radial artery. Each nurse was blinded to others PWA results. Observer agreement was assessed using the Bland-Altman {"}limits of agreement{"} (LOA, mean difference ±2 SD) approach. Results: Median gestation was 37 weeks (range: 12-42), mean age 31 years, 30{\%} nulliparous, mean brachial BP 128/79 mm Hg. Based on all six PWA measurements, mean AIX-75 was 11.7 (range: -18 to +35). The between-observer LOA was 0.1 ± 11.0 and the within-observer LOA's were 1 ± 10 and -2 ± 8 for the two nurses. Observer differences did not vary systematically with the magnitude of AIX-75. Conclusion: AIX-75 can be measured by nurses using PWA in pregnancy with a high level of observer agreement.",
keywords = "pulse wave analysis, augmentation index, pregnancy, agreement, repeatability, reliability, central hemodynamics, stiffness, pressure, preeclampsia, prediction, validation, velocity, device",
author = "Crilly, {Michael A.} and Orme, {Kirsty M.} and Joan Henderson and Allan, {Angela J.} and Sohinee Bhattacharya",
year = "2014",
month = "8",
doi = "10.3109/10641955.2013.877926",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "322--332",
journal = "Hypertension in Pregnancy",
issn = "1064-1955",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Repeatability of SphygmoCor pulse wave analysis in assessing arterial wave reflection in pregnancy using applanation tonometry

AU - Crilly, Michael A.

AU - Orme, Kirsty M.

AU - Henderson, Joan

AU - Allan, Angela J.

AU - Bhattacharya, Sohinee

PY - 2014/8

Y1 - 2014/8

N2 - Objective: To estimate clinical agreement in relation to measuring aortic augmentation index (AIX-75) in pregnancy in a routine clinical setting. Methods: A hospital-based clinical agreement study of 20 women in which two trained nurses alternated in measuring arterial function (AIX standardized to a heart rate of 75 beats-per-minute, AIX-75) on a single occasion in triplicate, after participants had rested semi-recumbent for 15 min. Right brachial blood pressure (BP) was measured using the Microlife 3BTO-A oscillometric device. Radial applanation pulse wave analysis (PWA) was undertaken according to current guidelines using the SphygmoCor device with a hand-held Millar tonometer applanated at the right radial artery. Each nurse was blinded to others PWA results. Observer agreement was assessed using the Bland-Altman "limits of agreement" (LOA, mean difference ±2 SD) approach. Results: Median gestation was 37 weeks (range: 12-42), mean age 31 years, 30% nulliparous, mean brachial BP 128/79 mm Hg. Based on all six PWA measurements, mean AIX-75 was 11.7 (range: -18 to +35). The between-observer LOA was 0.1 ± 11.0 and the within-observer LOA's were 1 ± 10 and -2 ± 8 for the two nurses. Observer differences did not vary systematically with the magnitude of AIX-75. Conclusion: AIX-75 can be measured by nurses using PWA in pregnancy with a high level of observer agreement.

AB - Objective: To estimate clinical agreement in relation to measuring aortic augmentation index (AIX-75) in pregnancy in a routine clinical setting. Methods: A hospital-based clinical agreement study of 20 women in which two trained nurses alternated in measuring arterial function (AIX standardized to a heart rate of 75 beats-per-minute, AIX-75) on a single occasion in triplicate, after participants had rested semi-recumbent for 15 min. Right brachial blood pressure (BP) was measured using the Microlife 3BTO-A oscillometric device. Radial applanation pulse wave analysis (PWA) was undertaken according to current guidelines using the SphygmoCor device with a hand-held Millar tonometer applanated at the right radial artery. Each nurse was blinded to others PWA results. Observer agreement was assessed using the Bland-Altman "limits of agreement" (LOA, mean difference ±2 SD) approach. Results: Median gestation was 37 weeks (range: 12-42), mean age 31 years, 30% nulliparous, mean brachial BP 128/79 mm Hg. Based on all six PWA measurements, mean AIX-75 was 11.7 (range: -18 to +35). The between-observer LOA was 0.1 ± 11.0 and the within-observer LOA's were 1 ± 10 and -2 ± 8 for the two nurses. Observer differences did not vary systematically with the magnitude of AIX-75. Conclusion: AIX-75 can be measured by nurses using PWA in pregnancy with a high level of observer agreement.

KW - pulse wave analysis

KW - augmentation index

KW - pregnancy

KW - agreement

KW - repeatability

KW - reliability

KW - central hemodynamics

KW - stiffness

KW - pressure

KW - preeclampsia

KW - prediction

KW - validation

KW - velocity

KW - device

U2 - 10.3109/10641955.2013.877926

DO - 10.3109/10641955.2013.877926

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 322

EP - 332

JO - Hypertension in Pregnancy

JF - Hypertension in Pregnancy

SN - 1064-1955

IS - 3

ER -