Research Note: Surveillance in contemporary health and social care: friend or foe?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This research note concerns the increasing ranges of technologies that are being used to monitor health and wellbeing. Many of these can be broadly interpreted as ‘surveillant’, implying powerful watching, even if this is not widely acknowledged. However, surveillance entails connotations of potentially inappropriate intrusion and impairment of valued freedoms. Therefore, the social and ethical ramifications of surveillance for health are a concern, particularly as technological advances are continually overtaking knowledge and understanding of them. While surveillance in health-related contexts has received some attention, conceptual and practical issues and social and ethical implications continue to arise with new, diverse and rapidly proliferating technologies.These need further investigation, especially because the direction of surveillance can be either health professional-led (‘surveillance’), or patient- or group-led (‘sousveillance’). This distinction has recently been identified as relevant to the research gap, particularly in respect of everyday life settings and integration, the ‘domestication’, of healthcare technologies. Ongoing and proposed future research explores social and ethical considerations pertaining to surveillant technologies for health and social care in the context of people’s everyday lives to contribute greater knowledge and understanding of health surveillance and its complexities.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)594-596
Number of pages3
JournalSurveillance & Society
Volume12
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

surveillance
Health
health
everyday life
Lead
domestication
health professionals
health care
Group

Keywords

  • surveillance
  • technologies
  • health and social care

Cite this

Research Note: Surveillance in contemporary health and social care: friend or foe? / Morgan, Heather May.

In: Surveillance & Society, Vol. 12, No. 4, 2014, p. 594-596.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8fc8423c859648dcbbd520dc8a63637e,
title = "Research Note: Surveillance in contemporary health and social care: friend or foe?",
abstract = "This research note concerns the increasing ranges of technologies that are being used to monitor health and wellbeing. Many of these can be broadly interpreted as ‘surveillant’, implying powerful watching, even if this is not widely acknowledged. However, surveillance entails connotations of potentially inappropriate intrusion and impairment of valued freedoms. Therefore, the social and ethical ramifications of surveillance for health are a concern, particularly as technological advances are continually overtaking knowledge and understanding of them. While surveillance in health-related contexts has received some attention, conceptual and practical issues and social and ethical implications continue to arise with new, diverse and rapidly proliferating technologies.These need further investigation, especially because the direction of surveillance can be either health professional-led (‘surveillance’), or patient- or group-led (‘sousveillance’). This distinction has recently been identified as relevant to the research gap, particularly in respect of everyday life settings and integration, the ‘domestication’, of healthcare technologies. Ongoing and proposed future research explores social and ethical considerations pertaining to surveillant technologies for health and social care in the context of people’s everyday lives to contribute greater knowledge and understanding of health surveillance and its complexities.",
keywords = "surveillance , technologies, health and social care",
author = "Morgan, {Heather May}",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "594--596",
journal = "Surveillance & Society",
issn = "1477-7487",
publisher = "Surveillance Studies Network",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Research Note: Surveillance in contemporary health and social care: friend or foe?

AU - Morgan, Heather May

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - This research note concerns the increasing ranges of technologies that are being used to monitor health and wellbeing. Many of these can be broadly interpreted as ‘surveillant’, implying powerful watching, even if this is not widely acknowledged. However, surveillance entails connotations of potentially inappropriate intrusion and impairment of valued freedoms. Therefore, the social and ethical ramifications of surveillance for health are a concern, particularly as technological advances are continually overtaking knowledge and understanding of them. While surveillance in health-related contexts has received some attention, conceptual and practical issues and social and ethical implications continue to arise with new, diverse and rapidly proliferating technologies.These need further investigation, especially because the direction of surveillance can be either health professional-led (‘surveillance’), or patient- or group-led (‘sousveillance’). This distinction has recently been identified as relevant to the research gap, particularly in respect of everyday life settings and integration, the ‘domestication’, of healthcare technologies. Ongoing and proposed future research explores social and ethical considerations pertaining to surveillant technologies for health and social care in the context of people’s everyday lives to contribute greater knowledge and understanding of health surveillance and its complexities.

AB - This research note concerns the increasing ranges of technologies that are being used to monitor health and wellbeing. Many of these can be broadly interpreted as ‘surveillant’, implying powerful watching, even if this is not widely acknowledged. However, surveillance entails connotations of potentially inappropriate intrusion and impairment of valued freedoms. Therefore, the social and ethical ramifications of surveillance for health are a concern, particularly as technological advances are continually overtaking knowledge and understanding of them. While surveillance in health-related contexts has received some attention, conceptual and practical issues and social and ethical implications continue to arise with new, diverse and rapidly proliferating technologies.These need further investigation, especially because the direction of surveillance can be either health professional-led (‘surveillance’), or patient- or group-led (‘sousveillance’). This distinction has recently been identified as relevant to the research gap, particularly in respect of everyday life settings and integration, the ‘domestication’, of healthcare technologies. Ongoing and proposed future research explores social and ethical considerations pertaining to surveillant technologies for health and social care in the context of people’s everyday lives to contribute greater knowledge and understanding of health surveillance and its complexities.

KW - surveillance

KW - technologies

KW - health and social care

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 594

EP - 596

JO - Surveillance & Society

JF - Surveillance & Society

SN - 1477-7487

IS - 4

ER -