Research trends

Forest ownership in multiple perspectives

Gerhard Weiss (Corresponding Author), Anna Lawrence, Gun Lidestav, Diana Feliciano, Hujala Teppo, Sarvašová Zuzana, Dobšinská Zuzana, Živojinović Ivana

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research on forest ownership has received growing attention in recent years, particularly in relation to the effects of restitution processes in former socialist countries, emerging new forest owner types, trends towards fragmentation of ownership structures, and questions related to the steady supply of forest industries with raw materials. Literature reviews indicate that despite the profound impact of different ownership categories on the actual forest management and fulfilment of policy goals, the aspect of ownership is rarely included in research on forest management or forest policy. Future research should first develop a more differentiated picture of legal forest ownership categories and owner types, going beyond a simple dichotomy of public and private ownership forms, and beyond simplified typologies such as non-traditional, urban or absentee forest owners. Second, it should tackle the question how the form of ownership relates to forest management and the provision of goods and services, and the extent to which new management approaches are needed for different owner types. Thirdly, it should ask about effective support structures for forest owners such as advisory services and other policy instruments, including how policy goals could be best achieved in consideration of different ownership forms and how different owner types could be best supported in their needs. In addition to broaden the empirical knowledge base across countries and development trends over time, we state a need for stronger theoretical foundations of and innovative conceptual approaches for forest ownership research that proactively grasp future anticipations.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalForest Policy and Economics
Volume99
Early online date18 Oct 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

forest ownership
ownership
forest management
trend
private ownership
forest policy
forest industries
management
raw materials
developing countries
Ownership
Research trends
Multiple perspectives
Owners
support structure
ownership structure
literature review
typology
socialist state
fragmentation

Keywords

  • Forest ownership forms
  • Typologies
  • Forest management
  • Forest policy
  • Research needs
  • Europe

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Weiss, G., Lawrence, A., Lidestav, G., Feliciano, D., Teppo, H., Zuzana, S., ... Ivana, Ž. (2019). Research trends: Forest ownership in multiple perspectives. Forest Policy and Economics, 99, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.10.006

Research trends : Forest ownership in multiple perspectives. / Weiss, Gerhard (Corresponding Author); Lawrence, Anna; Lidestav, Gun; Feliciano, Diana; Teppo, Hujala; Zuzana, Sarvašová; Zuzana, Dobšinská; Ivana, Živojinović.

In: Forest Policy and Economics, Vol. 99, 01.02.2019, p. 1-8.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Weiss, G, Lawrence, A, Lidestav, G, Feliciano, D, Teppo, H, Zuzana, S, Zuzana, D & Ivana, Ž 2019, 'Research trends: Forest ownership in multiple perspectives', Forest Policy and Economics, vol. 99, pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.10.006
Weiss, Gerhard ; Lawrence, Anna ; Lidestav, Gun ; Feliciano, Diana ; Teppo, Hujala ; Zuzana, Sarvašová ; Zuzana, Dobšinská ; Ivana, Živojinović. / Research trends : Forest ownership in multiple perspectives. In: Forest Policy and Economics. 2019 ; Vol. 99. pp. 1-8.
@article{b3b009f6818a4696ab50e15c86a41655,
title = "Research trends: Forest ownership in multiple perspectives",
abstract = "Research on forest ownership has received growing attention in recent years, particularly in relation to the effects of restitution processes in former socialist countries, emerging new forest owner types, trends towards fragmentation of ownership structures, and questions related to the steady supply of forest industries with raw materials. Literature reviews indicate that despite the profound impact of different ownership categories on the actual forest management and fulfilment of policy goals, the aspect of ownership is rarely included in research on forest management or forest policy. Future research should first develop a more differentiated picture of legal forest ownership categories and owner types, going beyond a simple dichotomy of public and private ownership forms, and beyond simplified typologies such as non-traditional, urban or absentee forest owners. Second, it should tackle the question how the form of ownership relates to forest management and the provision of goods and services, and the extent to which new management approaches are needed for different owner types. Thirdly, it should ask about effective support structures for forest owners such as advisory services and other policy instruments, including how policy goals could be best achieved in consideration of different ownership forms and how different owner types could be best supported in their needs. In addition to broaden the empirical knowledge base across countries and development trends over time, we state a need for stronger theoretical foundations of and innovative conceptual approaches for forest ownership research that proactively grasp future anticipations.",
keywords = "Forest ownership forms, Typologies, Forest management, Forest policy, Research needs, Europe",
author = "Gerhard Weiss and Anna Lawrence and Gun Lidestav and Diana Feliciano and Hujala Teppo and Sarvašov{\'a} Zuzana and Dobšinsk{\'a} Zuzana and Živojinović Ivana",
note = "The work on this article was supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) in the framework of the COST Action FP1201 - Forest Land Ownership Changes in Europe: Significance for Management and Policy (FACESMAP). In addition, the authors want to acknowledge all participants of the COST Action for their contributions throughout the Action as well as the very valuable peer reviewer comments.",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.forpol.2018.10.006",
language = "English",
volume = "99",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "Forest Policy and Economics",
issn = "1389-9341",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Research trends

T2 - Forest ownership in multiple perspectives

AU - Weiss, Gerhard

AU - Lawrence, Anna

AU - Lidestav, Gun

AU - Feliciano, Diana

AU - Teppo, Hujala

AU - Zuzana, Sarvašová

AU - Zuzana, Dobšinská

AU - Ivana, Živojinović

N1 - The work on this article was supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) in the framework of the COST Action FP1201 - Forest Land Ownership Changes in Europe: Significance for Management and Policy (FACESMAP). In addition, the authors want to acknowledge all participants of the COST Action for their contributions throughout the Action as well as the very valuable peer reviewer comments.

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - Research on forest ownership has received growing attention in recent years, particularly in relation to the effects of restitution processes in former socialist countries, emerging new forest owner types, trends towards fragmentation of ownership structures, and questions related to the steady supply of forest industries with raw materials. Literature reviews indicate that despite the profound impact of different ownership categories on the actual forest management and fulfilment of policy goals, the aspect of ownership is rarely included in research on forest management or forest policy. Future research should first develop a more differentiated picture of legal forest ownership categories and owner types, going beyond a simple dichotomy of public and private ownership forms, and beyond simplified typologies such as non-traditional, urban or absentee forest owners. Second, it should tackle the question how the form of ownership relates to forest management and the provision of goods and services, and the extent to which new management approaches are needed for different owner types. Thirdly, it should ask about effective support structures for forest owners such as advisory services and other policy instruments, including how policy goals could be best achieved in consideration of different ownership forms and how different owner types could be best supported in their needs. In addition to broaden the empirical knowledge base across countries and development trends over time, we state a need for stronger theoretical foundations of and innovative conceptual approaches for forest ownership research that proactively grasp future anticipations.

AB - Research on forest ownership has received growing attention in recent years, particularly in relation to the effects of restitution processes in former socialist countries, emerging new forest owner types, trends towards fragmentation of ownership structures, and questions related to the steady supply of forest industries with raw materials. Literature reviews indicate that despite the profound impact of different ownership categories on the actual forest management and fulfilment of policy goals, the aspect of ownership is rarely included in research on forest management or forest policy. Future research should first develop a more differentiated picture of legal forest ownership categories and owner types, going beyond a simple dichotomy of public and private ownership forms, and beyond simplified typologies such as non-traditional, urban or absentee forest owners. Second, it should tackle the question how the form of ownership relates to forest management and the provision of goods and services, and the extent to which new management approaches are needed for different owner types. Thirdly, it should ask about effective support structures for forest owners such as advisory services and other policy instruments, including how policy goals could be best achieved in consideration of different ownership forms and how different owner types could be best supported in their needs. In addition to broaden the empirical knowledge base across countries and development trends over time, we state a need for stronger theoretical foundations of and innovative conceptual approaches for forest ownership research that proactively grasp future anticipations.

KW - Forest ownership forms

KW - Typologies

KW - Forest management

KW - Forest policy

KW - Research needs

KW - Europe

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055052971&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.forpol.2018.10.006

DO - 10.1016/j.forpol.2018.10.006

M3 - Article

VL - 99

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - Forest Policy and Economics

JF - Forest Policy and Economics

SN - 1389-9341

ER -