Researchers' experiences, positive and negative, in integrative landscape projects

Barbel Tress, Gunther Tress, G. Fry

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    43 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Integrative (interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary) landscape research projects are becoming increasingly common. As a result, researchers are spending a larger proportion of their professional careers doing integrative work, participating in shifting interdisciplinary teams, and cooperating directly with non-academic participants. Despite the growing importance of integrative research, few studies have investigated researchers' experiences in these projects. How do researchers perceive the outcomes of integrative projects, or career effects? Do they view the projects generally as successes or failures? This study analyses researchers' experiences in integrative landscape studies and investigates what factors shape these experiences. The data stems from 19 semi-structured qualitative interviews and a Web-based survey among 207 participants in integrative landscape research projects. It finds that researchers experience participation in integrative projects as positive, in particular discussions among participants, networking, teamwork, and gaining new insights and skills. Furthermore, most researchers perceive the projects as successful and as having a positive effect on their careers. Less positive aspects of integration relate to publications and merit points. Factors found to contribute to positive experiences include reaching a high degree of integration amongst the involved disciplines, common definitions of integrative research concepts, and projects that include a large share of fundamental research as well as projects with many project outcomes. Based on these findings, we advise future projects to plan for integration, facilitate discussions, and reach agreement on integrative concepts. We suggest that aspects of fundamental research be included in integrative projects. We also suggest that planning be done at an early stage for peer-reviewed publications, to ensure that participants gain merit points from their participation in integrative research efforts.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)792-807
    Number of pages15
    JournalEnvironmental Management
    Volume36
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2005

    Keywords

    • career effect
    • interdisciplinarity
    • interviews
    • merit points
    • research outcome
    • transdisciplinarity
    • web survey
    • INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH
    • SCIENCE
    • MANAGEMENT
    • FRAMEWORK
    • DISCIPLINARY
    • ECOLOGY
    • POLICY
    • ISSUES

    Cite this

    Researchers' experiences, positive and negative, in integrative landscape projects. / Tress, Barbel; Tress, Gunther; Fry, G.

    In: Environmental Management, Vol. 36, No. 6, 12.2005, p. 792-807.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Tress, Barbel ; Tress, Gunther ; Fry, G. / Researchers' experiences, positive and negative, in integrative landscape projects. In: Environmental Management. 2005 ; Vol. 36, No. 6. pp. 792-807.
    @article{1faf778741dd49c4b022872e51e3adb7,
    title = "Researchers' experiences, positive and negative, in integrative landscape projects",
    abstract = "Integrative (interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary) landscape research projects are becoming increasingly common. As a result, researchers are spending a larger proportion of their professional careers doing integrative work, participating in shifting interdisciplinary teams, and cooperating directly with non-academic participants. Despite the growing importance of integrative research, few studies have investigated researchers' experiences in these projects. How do researchers perceive the outcomes of integrative projects, or career effects? Do they view the projects generally as successes or failures? This study analyses researchers' experiences in integrative landscape studies and investigates what factors shape these experiences. The data stems from 19 semi-structured qualitative interviews and a Web-based survey among 207 participants in integrative landscape research projects. It finds that researchers experience participation in integrative projects as positive, in particular discussions among participants, networking, teamwork, and gaining new insights and skills. Furthermore, most researchers perceive the projects as successful and as having a positive effect on their careers. Less positive aspects of integration relate to publications and merit points. Factors found to contribute to positive experiences include reaching a high degree of integration amongst the involved disciplines, common definitions of integrative research concepts, and projects that include a large share of fundamental research as well as projects with many project outcomes. Based on these findings, we advise future projects to plan for integration, facilitate discussions, and reach agreement on integrative concepts. We suggest that aspects of fundamental research be included in integrative projects. We also suggest that planning be done at an early stage for peer-reviewed publications, to ensure that participants gain merit points from their participation in integrative research efforts.",
    keywords = "career effect, interdisciplinarity, interviews, merit points, research outcome, transdisciplinarity, web survey, INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH, SCIENCE, MANAGEMENT, FRAMEWORK, DISCIPLINARY, ECOLOGY, POLICY, ISSUES",
    author = "Barbel Tress and Gunther Tress and G. Fry",
    year = "2005",
    month = "12",
    doi = "10.1007/s00267-005-0038-0",
    language = "English",
    volume = "36",
    pages = "792--807",
    journal = "Environmental Management",
    issn = "0364-152X",
    publisher = "Springer",
    number = "6",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Researchers' experiences, positive and negative, in integrative landscape projects

    AU - Tress, Barbel

    AU - Tress, Gunther

    AU - Fry, G.

    PY - 2005/12

    Y1 - 2005/12

    N2 - Integrative (interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary) landscape research projects are becoming increasingly common. As a result, researchers are spending a larger proportion of their professional careers doing integrative work, participating in shifting interdisciplinary teams, and cooperating directly with non-academic participants. Despite the growing importance of integrative research, few studies have investigated researchers' experiences in these projects. How do researchers perceive the outcomes of integrative projects, or career effects? Do they view the projects generally as successes or failures? This study analyses researchers' experiences in integrative landscape studies and investigates what factors shape these experiences. The data stems from 19 semi-structured qualitative interviews and a Web-based survey among 207 participants in integrative landscape research projects. It finds that researchers experience participation in integrative projects as positive, in particular discussions among participants, networking, teamwork, and gaining new insights and skills. Furthermore, most researchers perceive the projects as successful and as having a positive effect on their careers. Less positive aspects of integration relate to publications and merit points. Factors found to contribute to positive experiences include reaching a high degree of integration amongst the involved disciplines, common definitions of integrative research concepts, and projects that include a large share of fundamental research as well as projects with many project outcomes. Based on these findings, we advise future projects to plan for integration, facilitate discussions, and reach agreement on integrative concepts. We suggest that aspects of fundamental research be included in integrative projects. We also suggest that planning be done at an early stage for peer-reviewed publications, to ensure that participants gain merit points from their participation in integrative research efforts.

    AB - Integrative (interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary) landscape research projects are becoming increasingly common. As a result, researchers are spending a larger proportion of their professional careers doing integrative work, participating in shifting interdisciplinary teams, and cooperating directly with non-academic participants. Despite the growing importance of integrative research, few studies have investigated researchers' experiences in these projects. How do researchers perceive the outcomes of integrative projects, or career effects? Do they view the projects generally as successes or failures? This study analyses researchers' experiences in integrative landscape studies and investigates what factors shape these experiences. The data stems from 19 semi-structured qualitative interviews and a Web-based survey among 207 participants in integrative landscape research projects. It finds that researchers experience participation in integrative projects as positive, in particular discussions among participants, networking, teamwork, and gaining new insights and skills. Furthermore, most researchers perceive the projects as successful and as having a positive effect on their careers. Less positive aspects of integration relate to publications and merit points. Factors found to contribute to positive experiences include reaching a high degree of integration amongst the involved disciplines, common definitions of integrative research concepts, and projects that include a large share of fundamental research as well as projects with many project outcomes. Based on these findings, we advise future projects to plan for integration, facilitate discussions, and reach agreement on integrative concepts. We suggest that aspects of fundamental research be included in integrative projects. We also suggest that planning be done at an early stage for peer-reviewed publications, to ensure that participants gain merit points from their participation in integrative research efforts.

    KW - career effect

    KW - interdisciplinarity

    KW - interviews

    KW - merit points

    KW - research outcome

    KW - transdisciplinarity

    KW - web survey

    KW - INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH

    KW - SCIENCE

    KW - MANAGEMENT

    KW - FRAMEWORK

    KW - DISCIPLINARY

    KW - ECOLOGY

    KW - POLICY

    KW - ISSUES

    U2 - 10.1007/s00267-005-0038-0

    DO - 10.1007/s00267-005-0038-0

    M3 - Article

    VL - 36

    SP - 792

    EP - 807

    JO - Environmental Management

    JF - Environmental Management

    SN - 0364-152X

    IS - 6

    ER -