Resource use data by patient report or hospital records

do they agree?

A D Kennedy, A P Leigh-Brown, D J Torgerson, J Campbell, A M Grant

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background
Economic evaluations alongside clinical trials are becoming increasingly common. Cost data are often collected through the use of postal questionnaires; however, the accuracy of this method is uncertain. We compared postal questionnaires with hospital records for collecting data on physiotherapy service use.

Methods
As part of a randomised trial of orthopaedic medicine compared with orthopaedic surgery we collected physiotherapy use data on a group of patients from retrospective postal questionnaires and from hospital records.

Results
315 patients were referred for physiotherapy. Hospital data on attendances was available for 30% (n = 96), compared with 48% (n = 150) of patients completing questionnaire data (95% Cl for difference = 10% to 24%); 19% (n = 59) had data available from both sources. The two methods produced an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.54 (95% Cl 0.31 to 0.70). However, the two methods produced significantly different estimates of resource use with patient self report recalling a mean of 1.3 extra visits (95% Cl 0.4 to 2.2) compared with hospital records.

Conclusions
Using questionnaires in this study produced data on a greater number of patients compared with examination of hospital records. However, the two data sources did differ in the quantity of physiotherapy used and this should be taken into account in any analysis.
Original languageEnglish
Article number2
Number of pages5
JournalBMC Health Services Research
Volume2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Jan 2002

Fingerprint

Hospital Records
Orthopedics
Information Storage and Retrieval
Self Report
Medicine
Surveys and Questionnaires
Clinical Trials
Costs and Cost Analysis

Cite this

Kennedy, A. D., Leigh-Brown, A. P., Torgerson, D. J., Campbell, J., & Grant, A. M. (2002). Resource use data by patient report or hospital records: do they agree? BMC Health Services Research, 2, [2]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-2-2

Resource use data by patient report or hospital records : do they agree? / Kennedy, A D; Leigh-Brown, A P; Torgerson, D J; Campbell, J; Grant, A M.

In: BMC Health Services Research, Vol. 2, 2, 17.01.2002.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kennedy, AD, Leigh-Brown, AP, Torgerson, DJ, Campbell, J & Grant, AM 2002, 'Resource use data by patient report or hospital records: do they agree?', BMC Health Services Research, vol. 2, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-2-2
Kennedy, A D ; Leigh-Brown, A P ; Torgerson, D J ; Campbell, J ; Grant, A M. / Resource use data by patient report or hospital records : do they agree?. In: BMC Health Services Research. 2002 ; Vol. 2.
@article{602ad999ff034446aff2d46d50244bcf,
title = "Resource use data by patient report or hospital records: do they agree?",
abstract = "BackgroundEconomic evaluations alongside clinical trials are becoming increasingly common. Cost data are often collected through the use of postal questionnaires; however, the accuracy of this method is uncertain. We compared postal questionnaires with hospital records for collecting data on physiotherapy service use.MethodsAs part of a randomised trial of orthopaedic medicine compared with orthopaedic surgery we collected physiotherapy use data on a group of patients from retrospective postal questionnaires and from hospital records.Results315 patients were referred for physiotherapy. Hospital data on attendances was available for 30{\%} (n = 96), compared with 48{\%} (n = 150) of patients completing questionnaire data (95{\%} Cl for difference = 10{\%} to 24{\%}); 19{\%} (n = 59) had data available from both sources. The two methods produced an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.54 (95{\%} Cl 0.31 to 0.70). However, the two methods produced significantly different estimates of resource use with patient self report recalling a mean of 1.3 extra visits (95{\%} Cl 0.4 to 2.2) compared with hospital records.ConclusionsUsing questionnaires in this study produced data on a greater number of patients compared with examination of hospital records. However, the two data sources did differ in the quantity of physiotherapy used and this should be taken into account in any analysis.",
author = "Kennedy, {A D} and Leigh-Brown, {A P} and Torgerson, {D J} and J Campbell and Grant, {A M}",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1186/1472-6963-2-2",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
journal = "BMC Health Services Research",
issn = "1472-6963",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resource use data by patient report or hospital records

T2 - do they agree?

AU - Kennedy, A D

AU - Leigh-Brown, A P

AU - Torgerson, D J

AU - Campbell, J

AU - Grant, A M

PY - 2002/1/17

Y1 - 2002/1/17

N2 - BackgroundEconomic evaluations alongside clinical trials are becoming increasingly common. Cost data are often collected through the use of postal questionnaires; however, the accuracy of this method is uncertain. We compared postal questionnaires with hospital records for collecting data on physiotherapy service use.MethodsAs part of a randomised trial of orthopaedic medicine compared with orthopaedic surgery we collected physiotherapy use data on a group of patients from retrospective postal questionnaires and from hospital records.Results315 patients were referred for physiotherapy. Hospital data on attendances was available for 30% (n = 96), compared with 48% (n = 150) of patients completing questionnaire data (95% Cl for difference = 10% to 24%); 19% (n = 59) had data available from both sources. The two methods produced an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.54 (95% Cl 0.31 to 0.70). However, the two methods produced significantly different estimates of resource use with patient self report recalling a mean of 1.3 extra visits (95% Cl 0.4 to 2.2) compared with hospital records.ConclusionsUsing questionnaires in this study produced data on a greater number of patients compared with examination of hospital records. However, the two data sources did differ in the quantity of physiotherapy used and this should be taken into account in any analysis.

AB - BackgroundEconomic evaluations alongside clinical trials are becoming increasingly common. Cost data are often collected through the use of postal questionnaires; however, the accuracy of this method is uncertain. We compared postal questionnaires with hospital records for collecting data on physiotherapy service use.MethodsAs part of a randomised trial of orthopaedic medicine compared with orthopaedic surgery we collected physiotherapy use data on a group of patients from retrospective postal questionnaires and from hospital records.Results315 patients were referred for physiotherapy. Hospital data on attendances was available for 30% (n = 96), compared with 48% (n = 150) of patients completing questionnaire data (95% Cl for difference = 10% to 24%); 19% (n = 59) had data available from both sources. The two methods produced an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.54 (95% Cl 0.31 to 0.70). However, the two methods produced significantly different estimates of resource use with patient self report recalling a mean of 1.3 extra visits (95% Cl 0.4 to 2.2) compared with hospital records.ConclusionsUsing questionnaires in this study produced data on a greater number of patients compared with examination of hospital records. However, the two data sources did differ in the quantity of physiotherapy used and this should be taken into account in any analysis.

U2 - 10.1186/1472-6963-2-2

DO - 10.1186/1472-6963-2-2

M3 - Article

VL - 2

JO - BMC Health Services Research

JF - BMC Health Services Research

SN - 1472-6963

M1 - 2

ER -