Abstract
hence weaker crowding. Further, we argue that this effect arises at the stage of response selection. This conclusion is well supported by an analytical model based on these principles. We conclude that previously observed effects in crowding attributed to top-down or higher level processes might instead
be due to post-perceptual response selection strategies.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Attention, Perception & Psychophysics |
| Early online date | 3 Dec 2019 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 3 Dec 2019 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- object recognition
- crowding
- knowledge
- similarity
- top-down
- bottom-up
- response selection
- ATTENTION
- Similarity
- Top-down
- Response selection
- Bottom-up
- RESOLUTION
- SIGNALS
- FEATURE-INTEGRATION
- Object recognition
- Knowledge
- Crowding
- PERCEPTION
- OBJECT RECOGNITION
- LATERAL MASKING
Cite this
Response selection modulates crowding : a cautionary tale for invoking top-down explanations. / Reuther, Josephine (Corresponding Author); Chakravarthi, Ramakrishna.
In: Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 03.12.2019.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Response selection modulates crowding
T2 - a cautionary tale for invoking top-down explanations
AU - Reuther, Josephine
AU - Chakravarthi, Ramakrishna
N1 - Open Access via the Springer Compact Agreement Neither the data of experiment 1 or 2 are available, since consent given at the time of data collection lacked a corresponding statement. Only the experiment in the supplementary material was registered on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/xchya/).
PY - 2019/12/3
Y1 - 2019/12/3
N2 - Object recognition in the periphery is limited by clutter. This phenomenon of visual crowding is ameliorated when the objects are dissimilar. This effect of inter-object similarity has been extensively studied for low-level features and is thought to reflect bottom-up processes. Recently, crowding was also found to be reduced when objects belonged to explicitly distinct groups; that is, crowding was weak when they had low group membership similarity. It has been claimed that top-down knowledge is necessary to explain this effect of group membership, implying that the effect of similarity on crowding cannot be a purely bottom-up process. We tested the claim that the effect of group membership relies on knowledge in two experiments and found that neither explicit knowledge about differences in group membership nor the possibility of acquiring knowledge about target identities is necessary to produce the effects. These results suggest that top-down processes need not be invoked to explain the effect of group membership. Instead, we suggest that differences in flanker reportability that emerge from the differences in group membership are the source of the effect. That is, when targets and flankers are sampled from distinct groups, flankers cannot be inadvertently reported, leading to fewer errors andhence weaker crowding. Further, we argue that this effect arises at the stage of response selection. This conclusion is well supported by an analytical model based on these principles. We conclude that previously observed effects in crowding attributed to top-down or higher level processes might insteadbe due to post-perceptual response selection strategies.
AB - Object recognition in the periphery is limited by clutter. This phenomenon of visual crowding is ameliorated when the objects are dissimilar. This effect of inter-object similarity has been extensively studied for low-level features and is thought to reflect bottom-up processes. Recently, crowding was also found to be reduced when objects belonged to explicitly distinct groups; that is, crowding was weak when they had low group membership similarity. It has been claimed that top-down knowledge is necessary to explain this effect of group membership, implying that the effect of similarity on crowding cannot be a purely bottom-up process. We tested the claim that the effect of group membership relies on knowledge in two experiments and found that neither explicit knowledge about differences in group membership nor the possibility of acquiring knowledge about target identities is necessary to produce the effects. These results suggest that top-down processes need not be invoked to explain the effect of group membership. Instead, we suggest that differences in flanker reportability that emerge from the differences in group membership are the source of the effect. That is, when targets and flankers are sampled from distinct groups, flankers cannot be inadvertently reported, leading to fewer errors andhence weaker crowding. Further, we argue that this effect arises at the stage of response selection. This conclusion is well supported by an analytical model based on these principles. We conclude that previously observed effects in crowding attributed to top-down or higher level processes might insteadbe due to post-perceptual response selection strategies.
KW - object recognition
KW - crowding
KW - knowledge
KW - similarity
KW - top-down
KW - bottom-up
KW - response selection
KW - ATTENTION
KW - Similarity
KW - Top-down
KW - Response selection
KW - Bottom-up
KW - RESOLUTION
KW - SIGNALS
KW - FEATURE-INTEGRATION
KW - Object recognition
KW - Knowledge
KW - Crowding
KW - PERCEPTION
KW - OBJECT RECOGNITION
KW - LATERAL MASKING
U2 - 10.3758/s13414-019-01891-5
DO - 10.3758/s13414-019-01891-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 31797179
JO - Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
JF - Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
SN - 1943-3921
ER -