Response to Bataille et al.'s ‘Technological differences between Kostenki 17/II (Spitsynskaya industry, Central Russia) and the Protoaurignacian: Reply to Dinnis et al. (2019)’

Robert Dinnis* (Corresponding Author), Alexander Bessudnov, Natasha Reynolds, Abi Pate, Mikhail Sablin, Andrei Sinitsyn

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

We appreciate Bataille et al.'s (2019) interest in our article, but we take issue with their reply. Here, we address their arguments, clarify our work, and outline some of the errors evident in their critical comment.
Original languageEnglish
Article number102792
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Human Evolution
Volume146
Early online date28 Apr 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2020

Keywords

  • Aurignacian
  • Lithic technology
  • Fumane
  • Labeko Koba
  • Arbreda
  • Aquitaine model
  • CHRONOLOGY
  • LIGURIA
  • MIDDLE
  • PROTO-AURIGNACIAN

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Response to Bataille et al.'s ‘Technological differences between Kostenki 17/II (Spitsynskaya industry, Central Russia) and the Protoaurignacian: Reply to Dinnis et al. (2019)’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this