Responses improve the accuracy of confidence judgements in memory tasks

Marta Siedlecka, Zuzanna Skóra, Borysław Paulewicz, Sonia Fijalkowska, Bert Timmermans, Michal Wierzchon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

82 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

How do we assess what we remember? Previous work on metacognition suggests that confidence judgements are more accurate when given after than before a response to a perceptual task. Here we present two experiments that investigate the influence of decision and response on metacognitive accuracy in a memory task so as to establish what kind of information people use to assess their memory content. Participants were asked to remember lists of words and then to decide which of two target words had previously been presented. In both experiments, participants rated their confidence either after or before the response. However, the experiments differed in the amount of information provided for confidence rating. In Experiment 1, before confidence rating, participants were either presented with both target words and asked to decide between them, or they were only presented with a cue (first letter of the subsequent target words). In Experiment 2, participants were always presented with a target word before confidence rating. The results of both experiments showed that although task accuracy correlated with confidence ratings in both conditions, this relationship was weaker when confidence was assessed before response to a memory task. We argue that metacognitive judgements are influenced by processing information that is not available at the time of primary response. We discuss the implications for theories of confidence and metacognition.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)712-723
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition
Volume45
Issue number4
Early online date12 Jul 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

confidence
experiment
rating
Automatic Data Processing
Cues
Confidence
information processing
Experiment
Metacognition
Rating

Keywords

  • Confidence
  • Decision making
  • Memory
  • Metacognition
  • Metacognitive awareness
  • DECISION
  • memory
  • CONSCIOUSNESS
  • metacognition
  • confidence
  • TIME
  • AWARENESS
  • PREFRONTAL CORTEX
  • RETRIEVAL
  • CHOICE
  • SIGNAL-DETECTION
  • decision making
  • SUBJECTIVE MEASURES
  • RECOGNITION MEMORY
  • metacognitive awareness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Responses improve the accuracy of confidence judgements in memory tasks. / Siedlecka, Marta; Skóra, Zuzanna; Paulewicz, Borysław; Fijalkowska, Sonia; Timmermans, Bert; Wierzchon, Michal.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, Vol. 45, No. 4, 2019, p. 712-723.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Siedlecka, Marta ; Skóra, Zuzanna ; Paulewicz, Borysław ; Fijalkowska, Sonia ; Timmermans, Bert ; Wierzchon, Michal. / Responses improve the accuracy of confidence judgements in memory tasks. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 2019 ; Vol. 45, No. 4. pp. 712-723.
@article{49d6b018960042b28fd46bd40a2b2f0a,
title = "Responses improve the accuracy of confidence judgements in memory tasks",
abstract = "How do we assess what we remember? Previous work on metacognition suggests that confidence judgements are more accurate when given after than before a response to a perceptual task. Here we present two experiments that investigate the influence of decision and response on metacognitive accuracy in a memory task so as to establish what kind of information people use to assess their memory content. Participants were asked to remember lists of words and then to decide which of two target words had previously been presented. In both experiments, participants rated their confidence either after or before the response. However, the experiments differed in the amount of information provided for confidence rating. In Experiment 1, before confidence rating, participants were either presented with both target words and asked to decide between them, or they were only presented with a cue (first letter of the subsequent target words). In Experiment 2, participants were always presented with a target word before confidence rating. The results of both experiments showed that although task accuracy correlated with confidence ratings in both conditions, this relationship was weaker when confidence was assessed before response to a memory task. We argue that metacognitive judgements are influenced by processing information that is not available at the time of primary response. We discuss the implications for theories of confidence and metacognition.",
keywords = "Confidence, Decision making, Memory, Metacognition, Metacognitive awareness, DECISION, memory, CONSCIOUSNESS, metacognition, confidence, TIME, AWARENESS, PREFRONTAL CORTEX, RETRIEVAL, CHOICE, SIGNAL-DETECTION, decision making, SUBJECTIVE MEASURES, RECOGNITION MEMORY, metacognitive awareness",
author = "Marta Siedlecka and Zuzanna Sk{\'o}ra and Borysław Paulewicz and Sonia Fijalkowska and Bert Timmermans and Michal Wierzchon",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1037/xlm0000608",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "712--723",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition",
issn = "0278-7393",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Responses improve the accuracy of confidence judgements in memory tasks

AU - Siedlecka, Marta

AU - Skóra, Zuzanna

AU - Paulewicz, Borysław

AU - Fijalkowska, Sonia

AU - Timmermans, Bert

AU - Wierzchon, Michal

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - How do we assess what we remember? Previous work on metacognition suggests that confidence judgements are more accurate when given after than before a response to a perceptual task. Here we present two experiments that investigate the influence of decision and response on metacognitive accuracy in a memory task so as to establish what kind of information people use to assess their memory content. Participants were asked to remember lists of words and then to decide which of two target words had previously been presented. In both experiments, participants rated their confidence either after or before the response. However, the experiments differed in the amount of information provided for confidence rating. In Experiment 1, before confidence rating, participants were either presented with both target words and asked to decide between them, or they were only presented with a cue (first letter of the subsequent target words). In Experiment 2, participants were always presented with a target word before confidence rating. The results of both experiments showed that although task accuracy correlated with confidence ratings in both conditions, this relationship was weaker when confidence was assessed before response to a memory task. We argue that metacognitive judgements are influenced by processing information that is not available at the time of primary response. We discuss the implications for theories of confidence and metacognition.

AB - How do we assess what we remember? Previous work on metacognition suggests that confidence judgements are more accurate when given after than before a response to a perceptual task. Here we present two experiments that investigate the influence of decision and response on metacognitive accuracy in a memory task so as to establish what kind of information people use to assess their memory content. Participants were asked to remember lists of words and then to decide which of two target words had previously been presented. In both experiments, participants rated their confidence either after or before the response. However, the experiments differed in the amount of information provided for confidence rating. In Experiment 1, before confidence rating, participants were either presented with both target words and asked to decide between them, or they were only presented with a cue (first letter of the subsequent target words). In Experiment 2, participants were always presented with a target word before confidence rating. The results of both experiments showed that although task accuracy correlated with confidence ratings in both conditions, this relationship was weaker when confidence was assessed before response to a memory task. We argue that metacognitive judgements are influenced by processing information that is not available at the time of primary response. We discuss the implications for theories of confidence and metacognition.

KW - Confidence

KW - Decision making

KW - Memory

KW - Metacognition

KW - Metacognitive awareness

KW - DECISION

KW - memory

KW - CONSCIOUSNESS

KW - metacognition

KW - confidence

KW - TIME

KW - AWARENESS

KW - PREFRONTAL CORTEX

KW - RETRIEVAL

KW - CHOICE

KW - SIGNAL-DETECTION

KW - decision making

KW - SUBJECTIVE MEASURES

KW - RECOGNITION MEMORY

KW - metacognitive awareness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049773963&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/xlm0000608

DO - 10.1037/xlm0000608

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 712

EP - 723

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition

SN - 0278-7393

IS - 4

ER -