Review article: The Deliverance of God

Research output: Contribution to journalBook/Film/Article review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Douglas Campbell’s recent work The Deliverance of God represents a major rereading of Paul’s letter to the Romans, especially its early chapters, and through this offers a broader reinterpretation of Pauline soteriology, deliberately set in dialogue with theological traditions, particularly those founded on forensic understandings of atonement. This article evaluates the key elements of Campbell’s argument, particularly (1) his depiction of Jewish soteriology (2) his suggestion that much of Rom. 1.18–3.20 utilizes the rhetorical device of ‘speech-in-character’, and therefore represents the opinion of Paul’s opponent rather than that of the apostle himself, and (3) his treatment of historical theology. The Deliverance of God is found to be stimulating and provocative at points, and to be a significant contribution to the field, but unconvincing in its major moves.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)150-161
Number of pages12
JournalJournal for the Study of the New Testament
Volume34
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2011

Fingerprint

Soteriology
Deliverance
Deity
Theology
Opponents
Rereading
Apostles
Rhetorical Devices
Atonement
Letters
Reinterpretation

Keywords

  • atonement
  • justification
  • Luther
  • Lutheranism
  • Paul
  • Pauline soteriology
  • new perspective on Paul
  • Romans
  • Romans 1.18-3.20
  • salvation

Cite this

Review article: The Deliverance of God. / Macaskill, Grant.

In: Journal for the Study of the New Testament, Vol. 34, No. 2, 12.2011, p. 150-161.

Research output: Contribution to journalBook/Film/Article review

@article{1fba8208d916452eaa8a7ba39d96bca0,
title = "Review article: The Deliverance of God",
abstract = "Douglas Campbell’s recent work The Deliverance of God represents a major rereading of Paul’s letter to the Romans, especially its early chapters, and through this offers a broader reinterpretation of Pauline soteriology, deliberately set in dialogue with theological traditions, particularly those founded on forensic understandings of atonement. This article evaluates the key elements of Campbell’s argument, particularly (1) his depiction of Jewish soteriology (2) his suggestion that much of Rom. 1.18–3.20 utilizes the rhetorical device of ‘speech-in-character’, and therefore represents the opinion of Paul’s opponent rather than that of the apostle himself, and (3) his treatment of historical theology. The Deliverance of God is found to be stimulating and provocative at points, and to be a significant contribution to the field, but unconvincing in its major moves.",
keywords = "atonement, justification, Luther, Lutheranism, Paul, Pauline soteriology, new perspective on Paul, Romans, Romans 1.18-3.20, salvation",
author = "Grant Macaskill",
note = "M1 - Article",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1177/0142064X11424852",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "150--161",
journal = "Journal for the Study of the New Testament",
issn = "0142-064X",
publisher = "SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Review article: The Deliverance of God

AU - Macaskill, Grant

N1 - M1 - Article

PY - 2011/12

Y1 - 2011/12

N2 - Douglas Campbell’s recent work The Deliverance of God represents a major rereading of Paul’s letter to the Romans, especially its early chapters, and through this offers a broader reinterpretation of Pauline soteriology, deliberately set in dialogue with theological traditions, particularly those founded on forensic understandings of atonement. This article evaluates the key elements of Campbell’s argument, particularly (1) his depiction of Jewish soteriology (2) his suggestion that much of Rom. 1.18–3.20 utilizes the rhetorical device of ‘speech-in-character’, and therefore represents the opinion of Paul’s opponent rather than that of the apostle himself, and (3) his treatment of historical theology. The Deliverance of God is found to be stimulating and provocative at points, and to be a significant contribution to the field, but unconvincing in its major moves.

AB - Douglas Campbell’s recent work The Deliverance of God represents a major rereading of Paul’s letter to the Romans, especially its early chapters, and through this offers a broader reinterpretation of Pauline soteriology, deliberately set in dialogue with theological traditions, particularly those founded on forensic understandings of atonement. This article evaluates the key elements of Campbell’s argument, particularly (1) his depiction of Jewish soteriology (2) his suggestion that much of Rom. 1.18–3.20 utilizes the rhetorical device of ‘speech-in-character’, and therefore represents the opinion of Paul’s opponent rather than that of the apostle himself, and (3) his treatment of historical theology. The Deliverance of God is found to be stimulating and provocative at points, and to be a significant contribution to the field, but unconvincing in its major moves.

KW - atonement

KW - justification

KW - Luther

KW - Lutheranism

KW - Paul

KW - Pauline soteriology

KW - new perspective on Paul

KW - Romans

KW - Romans 1.18-3.20

KW - salvation

U2 - 10.1177/0142064X11424852

DO - 10.1177/0142064X11424852

M3 - Book/Film/Article review

VL - 34

SP - 150

EP - 161

JO - Journal for the Study of the New Testament

JF - Journal for the Study of the New Testament

SN - 0142-064X

IS - 2

ER -