Review of Policies for Biodiversity Informatics in Southern Africa

Case Studies of Botswana and South Africa

Aime Tsinda, Pamela Ann Abbott, Roger Mugisha

Research output: Working paper

Abstract

Conservation and management of biodiversity data is crucial for Sub-Saharan Africa countries. As signatories to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), Botswana and South Africa have undertaken to abide by what has been stipulated by the CBD and to endeavor to provide legislative, administrative and policy measures towards achieving biodiversity data management. This article reviews policy and legislation instruments in order to identify their weaknesses and strengths and come up with recommendations for effective biodiversity data management. The methodology employed was a qualitative content analysis of relevant legislation in Botswana and South Africa. Results reveal two contrasting situations. South Africa has made significant progress in developing policies, enacting biodiversity-related legislation that emphasizes their commitment towards the collection and use of biological diversity data for the sustainable progress of the country. However, these pieces of legislation need to review and consolidate the laws relating to biodiversity informatics and to develop a biodiversity policy together with an implementation plan. These are important to inform the overall national development agenda. In Botswana, the issues are more related to absence of legislation addressing biodiversity data management. Biodiversity informatics is not mentioned in any policy or legal document. There is therefore a need to revisit the policy and legislative instruments because there have been huge changes in the technologies for remote and field biodiversity data collection, data storage, big data analysis, data visualization, informatics infrastructure development, capacity building, outreach and open access initiatives.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherSSRN
Number of pages24
Publication statusPublished - 5 Feb 2018

Fingerprint

Botswana
Southern Africa
biodiversity
legislation
management
data storage
infrastructure development
national development
open access
visualization
content analysis
data analysis
conservation
commitment
Law
methodology

Keywords

  • Biodiversity
  • Botswana
  • Informatics
  • Institutions
  • Policy
  • South Africa

Cite this

@techreport{bc6444e137a7474ba05e4a7e419f4ce2,
title = "Review of Policies for Biodiversity Informatics in Southern Africa: Case Studies of Botswana and South Africa",
abstract = "Conservation and management of biodiversity data is crucial for Sub-Saharan Africa countries. As signatories to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), Botswana and South Africa have undertaken to abide by what has been stipulated by the CBD and to endeavor to provide legislative, administrative and policy measures towards achieving biodiversity data management. This article reviews policy and legislation instruments in order to identify their weaknesses and strengths and come up with recommendations for effective biodiversity data management. The methodology employed was a qualitative content analysis of relevant legislation in Botswana and South Africa. Results reveal two contrasting situations. South Africa has made significant progress in developing policies, enacting biodiversity-related legislation that emphasizes their commitment towards the collection and use of biological diversity data for the sustainable progress of the country. However, these pieces of legislation need to review and consolidate the laws relating to biodiversity informatics and to develop a biodiversity policy together with an implementation plan. These are important to inform the overall national development agenda. In Botswana, the issues are more related to absence of legislation addressing biodiversity data management. Biodiversity informatics is not mentioned in any policy or legal document. There is therefore a need to revisit the policy and legislative instruments because there have been huge changes in the technologies for remote and field biodiversity data collection, data storage, big data analysis, data visualization, informatics infrastructure development, capacity building, outreach and open access initiatives.",
keywords = "Biodiversity, Botswana, Informatics, Institutions, Policy, South Africa",
author = "Aime Tsinda and Abbott, {Pamela Ann} and Roger Mugisha",
note = "This article draws on a research carried out as part of a project that aims to review policies that promote biodiversity informatics in Sub-Saharan Africa. This project was being funded by JRS Biodiversity Foundation and is being carried out by the Institute of Policy Analysis and Research (IPAR-Rwanda). The authors would like to thank Dr Don S. Doering, the Executive Director of JRS Biodiversity Foundation, and his team for their invaluable support. The authors would also like to thank Professor Roger Sapsford for his valuable comments and suggestions to improve the quality of the paper.",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "5",
language = "English",
publisher = "SSRN",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "SSRN",

}

TY - UNPB

T1 - Review of Policies for Biodiversity Informatics in Southern Africa

T2 - Case Studies of Botswana and South Africa

AU - Tsinda, Aime

AU - Abbott, Pamela Ann

AU - Mugisha, Roger

N1 - This article draws on a research carried out as part of a project that aims to review policies that promote biodiversity informatics in Sub-Saharan Africa. This project was being funded by JRS Biodiversity Foundation and is being carried out by the Institute of Policy Analysis and Research (IPAR-Rwanda). The authors would like to thank Dr Don S. Doering, the Executive Director of JRS Biodiversity Foundation, and his team for their invaluable support. The authors would also like to thank Professor Roger Sapsford for his valuable comments and suggestions to improve the quality of the paper.

PY - 2018/2/5

Y1 - 2018/2/5

N2 - Conservation and management of biodiversity data is crucial for Sub-Saharan Africa countries. As signatories to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), Botswana and South Africa have undertaken to abide by what has been stipulated by the CBD and to endeavor to provide legislative, administrative and policy measures towards achieving biodiversity data management. This article reviews policy and legislation instruments in order to identify their weaknesses and strengths and come up with recommendations for effective biodiversity data management. The methodology employed was a qualitative content analysis of relevant legislation in Botswana and South Africa. Results reveal two contrasting situations. South Africa has made significant progress in developing policies, enacting biodiversity-related legislation that emphasizes their commitment towards the collection and use of biological diversity data for the sustainable progress of the country. However, these pieces of legislation need to review and consolidate the laws relating to biodiversity informatics and to develop a biodiversity policy together with an implementation plan. These are important to inform the overall national development agenda. In Botswana, the issues are more related to absence of legislation addressing biodiversity data management. Biodiversity informatics is not mentioned in any policy or legal document. There is therefore a need to revisit the policy and legislative instruments because there have been huge changes in the technologies for remote and field biodiversity data collection, data storage, big data analysis, data visualization, informatics infrastructure development, capacity building, outreach and open access initiatives.

AB - Conservation and management of biodiversity data is crucial for Sub-Saharan Africa countries. As signatories to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), Botswana and South Africa have undertaken to abide by what has been stipulated by the CBD and to endeavor to provide legislative, administrative and policy measures towards achieving biodiversity data management. This article reviews policy and legislation instruments in order to identify their weaknesses and strengths and come up with recommendations for effective biodiversity data management. The methodology employed was a qualitative content analysis of relevant legislation in Botswana and South Africa. Results reveal two contrasting situations. South Africa has made significant progress in developing policies, enacting biodiversity-related legislation that emphasizes their commitment towards the collection and use of biological diversity data for the sustainable progress of the country. However, these pieces of legislation need to review and consolidate the laws relating to biodiversity informatics and to develop a biodiversity policy together with an implementation plan. These are important to inform the overall national development agenda. In Botswana, the issues are more related to absence of legislation addressing biodiversity data management. Biodiversity informatics is not mentioned in any policy or legal document. There is therefore a need to revisit the policy and legislative instruments because there have been huge changes in the technologies for remote and field biodiversity data collection, data storage, big data analysis, data visualization, informatics infrastructure development, capacity building, outreach and open access initiatives.

KW - Biodiversity

KW - Botswana

KW - Informatics

KW - Institutions

KW - Policy

KW - South Africa

M3 - Working paper

BT - Review of Policies for Biodiversity Informatics in Southern Africa

PB - SSRN

ER -