Risk assessment of chlorinated paraffins in feed and food

EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM), Dieter Schrenk, Marguerita Bignami, Laurent Bodin, James Kevin Chipman, Jesús del Mazo, Bettina Grasl-Kraupp, Christer Hogstrand, Laurentius (Ron) Hoogenboom, Jean-Charles Leblanc, Carlo Stefano Nebbia, Evangelia Ntzani, Annette Petersen, Salomon Sand, Tanja Schwerdtle, Christiane Vleminckx, Heather Wallace, Beat Brüschweiler, Pim Leonards, Martin RoseMarco Binaglia, Zsuzsanna Horváth, Luisa Ramos Bordajandi, Elsa Nielsen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Abstract The European Commission asked EFSA for a scientific opinion on the risks for animal and human health related to the presence of chlorinated paraffins in feed and food. The data for experimental animals were reviewed and the CONTAM Panel identified the liver, kidney and thyroid as the target organs for the SCCP and MCCP mixtures tested in repeated dose toxicity studies. Decreased pup survival and subcutaneous haematoma/haemorrhage were also identified as critical effects for an MCCP mixture. For the LCCP mixtures tested, the liver was identified as the target organ. The Panel selected as reference points a BMDL10 of 2.3 mg/kg bw per day for increased incidence of nephritis in male rats, and of 36 mg/kg bw per day for increased relative kidney weights in male and female rats for SCCPs and MCCPs, respectively. For LCCPs, a reference point relevant for humans could not be identified. Due to the limitations in the toxicokinetic and toxicological database, the Panel concluded that derivation of a health-based guidance value was not appropriate. Only limited data on the occurrence of SCCPs and MCCPs in some fish species were submitted to EFSA. No data were submitted for LCCPs. Thus, a robust exposure assessment and consequently a complete risk characterisation could not be performed. A preliminary risk characterisation based only on the consumption of fish was performed, and the calculated margins of exposure suggested no health concern for this limited scenario. The Panel noted that dietary exposure will be higher due to the contribution of CPs from other foods. The Panel was not able to identify reference points for farm animals, horses and companion animals. No occurrence data for feed were submitted to EFSA. Therefore, no risk characterisation could be performed for any of these animal species.
Original languageEnglish
Article number5991
Number of pages220
JournalEFSA Journal
Volume18
Issue number3
Early online date9 Mar 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2020

Keywords

  • chlorinated paraffins
  • SCCP
  • MCCP
  • LCCP
  • food
  • feed
  • risk assessment
  • SHORT-CHAIN
  • PROLIFERATOR-ACTIVATED RECEPTOR
  • POLYCHLORINATED N-ALKANES
  • ENVIRONMENTAL-SAMPLES
  • POLYBROMINATED DIPHENYL ETHERS
  • WATER TREATMENT PLANTS
  • POLYHALOGENATED COMPOUNDS
  • DIETARY ACCUMULATION
  • 2-DIMENSIONAL GAS-CHROMATOGRAPHY
  • HOME-PRODUCED EGGS

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Risk assessment of chlorinated paraffins in feed and food'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    (CONTAM), EFSA. P. C. I. T. F. C., Schrenk, D., Bignami, M., Bodin, L., Chipman, J. K., del Mazo, J., Grasl-Kraupp, B., Hogstrand, C., Hoogenboom, L. R., Leblanc, J-C., Nebbia, C. S., Ntzani, E., Petersen, A., Sand, S., Schwerdtle, T., Vleminckx, C., Wallace, H., Brüschweiler, B., Leonards, P., ... Nielsen, E. (2020). Risk assessment of chlorinated paraffins in feed and food. EFSA Journal, 18(3), [5991]. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5991