Rival bishops, rival cathedrals: the election of Cormac, archdeacon of Sodor, as bishop in 1331

Sarah E Thomas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

On 6 July 1331, two procurators arrived in Bergen claiming that
Cormac son of Cormac had been elected bishop of Sodor by the clergy of Skye
and the canons of Snizort. Their arrival is recorded in a letter sent by Eiliv,
archbishop of Nidaros, to two canons of the church of Bergen ordering that
there be an examination of the election in the cathedral of Bergen on 12 July
1331. Cormac’s election was contentious for three main reasons: firstly, there
was already a new bishop of Sodor; secondly the right to elect a bishop of Sodor
seems to have lain with the clergy of Man; and thirdly the king of Scots had the
right to present the candidate to the archbishop of Nidaros. This paper examines
the identities and careers of both Cormac and his successful rival, Thomas de
Rossy, and the potential reasons for Cormac’s claim and its ultimate failure.
Therefore, this study reveals some of the underlying geopolitical realities of the
diocese of Sodor in the mid-fourteenth century.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)145-163
Number of pages19
JournalInnes Review
Volume60
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2009

Fingerprint

Cathedrals
Rivals
Bergen
Elections
Canon
Clergy
Letters

Keywords

  • medieval
  • Scotland
  • Norway
  • church
  • papacy
  • Hebrides

Cite this

Rival bishops, rival cathedrals : the election of Cormac, archdeacon of Sodor, as bishop in 1331. / Thomas, Sarah E.

In: Innes Review, Vol. 60, No. 2, 11.2009, p. 145-163.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dbaf5541e6614c06afa6a795adcd2e0c,
title = "Rival bishops, rival cathedrals: the election of Cormac, archdeacon of Sodor, as bishop in 1331",
abstract = "On 6 July 1331, two procurators arrived in Bergen claiming that Cormac son of Cormac had been elected bishop of Sodor by the clergy of Skye and the canons of Snizort. Their arrival is recorded in a letter sent by Eiliv, archbishop of Nidaros, to two canons of the church of Bergen ordering that there be an examination of the election in the cathedral of Bergen on 12 July 1331. Cormac’s election was contentious for three main reasons: firstly, there was already a new bishop of Sodor; secondly the right to elect a bishop of Sodor seems to have lain with the clergy of Man; and thirdly the king of Scots had the right to present the candidate to the archbishop of Nidaros. This paper examines the identities and careers of both Cormac and his successful rival, Thomas de Rossy, and the potential reasons for Cormac’s claim and its ultimate failure. Therefore, this study reveals some of the underlying geopolitical realities of the diocese of Sodor in the mid-fourteenth century.",
keywords = "medieval, Scotland , Norway , church , papacy , Hebrides",
author = "Thomas, {Sarah E}",
year = "2009",
month = "11",
doi = "10.3366/E0020157X0900050X",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "145--163",
journal = "Innes Review",
issn = "0020-157X",
publisher = "Edinburgh University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rival bishops, rival cathedrals

T2 - the election of Cormac, archdeacon of Sodor, as bishop in 1331

AU - Thomas, Sarah E

PY - 2009/11

Y1 - 2009/11

N2 - On 6 July 1331, two procurators arrived in Bergen claiming that Cormac son of Cormac had been elected bishop of Sodor by the clergy of Skye and the canons of Snizort. Their arrival is recorded in a letter sent by Eiliv, archbishop of Nidaros, to two canons of the church of Bergen ordering that there be an examination of the election in the cathedral of Bergen on 12 July 1331. Cormac’s election was contentious for three main reasons: firstly, there was already a new bishop of Sodor; secondly the right to elect a bishop of Sodor seems to have lain with the clergy of Man; and thirdly the king of Scots had the right to present the candidate to the archbishop of Nidaros. This paper examines the identities and careers of both Cormac and his successful rival, Thomas de Rossy, and the potential reasons for Cormac’s claim and its ultimate failure. Therefore, this study reveals some of the underlying geopolitical realities of the diocese of Sodor in the mid-fourteenth century.

AB - On 6 July 1331, two procurators arrived in Bergen claiming that Cormac son of Cormac had been elected bishop of Sodor by the clergy of Skye and the canons of Snizort. Their arrival is recorded in a letter sent by Eiliv, archbishop of Nidaros, to two canons of the church of Bergen ordering that there be an examination of the election in the cathedral of Bergen on 12 July 1331. Cormac’s election was contentious for three main reasons: firstly, there was already a new bishop of Sodor; secondly the right to elect a bishop of Sodor seems to have lain with the clergy of Man; and thirdly the king of Scots had the right to present the candidate to the archbishop of Nidaros. This paper examines the identities and careers of both Cormac and his successful rival, Thomas de Rossy, and the potential reasons for Cormac’s claim and its ultimate failure. Therefore, this study reveals some of the underlying geopolitical realities of the diocese of Sodor in the mid-fourteenth century.

KW - medieval

KW - Scotland

KW - Norway

KW - church

KW - papacy

KW - Hebrides

U2 - 10.3366/E0020157X0900050X

DO - 10.3366/E0020157X0900050X

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 145

EP - 163

JO - Innes Review

JF - Innes Review

SN - 0020-157X

IS - 2

ER -