Robotic Colonic Surgery: Is It Advisable to Commence a New Learning Curve?

Andrew Kai-Yip Fung, Emad H Aly

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery has potential advantages in rectal and pelvic surgery, in which the dissection is performed within a confined operative field. However, the position of robotic colonic surgery remains largely undefined with limited insight of whether it offers any potential advantages over open or laparoscopic colon surgery.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review was to compare the short-term outcomes of the published robotic colonic surgery with those of laparoscopic colonic surgery.

DATA SOURCES: The search was performed in September 2012 with the use of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The search terms used were "colorectal," "colon," "colectomy," and "robotic/robot."

DATA SELECTION: All studies reporting outcomes on robotic colonic resection were included in the review process. Colonic robotic data were compared with data on the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic colonic surgery from a Cochrane review and 4 main randomized controlled trials.

INTERVENTIONS: A comparison was conducted of robotic colonic surgery vs standard laparoscopic colonic surgery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Short-term outcomes and the complication profile of colonic robotic surgery were compared with conventional multiple-port laparoscopic colonic surgery.

RESULTS: Fifteen robotic colonic surgery articles with 351 patients (173 males, 178 females) were considered for analysis. The operative time and financial cost of robotic colonic surgery was greater than standard laparoscopic colonic surgery with comparable short-term outcomes and early postoperative complications profile.

CONCLUSIONS: The present evidence on robotic colonic surgery has shown both feasibility and a safety profile comparable to standard laparoscopic colonic surgery. However, operative time and cost were greater in robotic colonic surgery, with no difference in the length of postoperative stay in comparison with standard laparoscopic colonic surgery. Whether the general surgical community should embark on a new learning curve for robotic colonic surgery can only be answered in the light of future studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)786-796
Number of pages11
JournalDiseases of the Colon & Rectum
Volume56
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2013

Fingerprint

Learning Curve
Robotics
Laparoscopy
Operative Time
Colon
Costs and Cost Analysis
Colectomy
PubMed
MEDLINE
Dissection
Length of Stay
Randomized Controlled Trials

Keywords

  • Colon surgery
  • Laparoscopic
  • Robotic

Cite this

Robotic Colonic Surgery : Is It Advisable to Commence a New Learning Curve? / Fung, Andrew Kai-Yip; Aly, Emad H.

In: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, Vol. 56, No. 6, 06.2013, p. 786-796.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{44cf792507984d4f8b1939eb4c677275,
title = "Robotic Colonic Surgery: Is It Advisable to Commence a New Learning Curve?",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery has potential advantages in rectal and pelvic surgery, in which the dissection is performed within a confined operative field. However, the position of robotic colonic surgery remains largely undefined with limited insight of whether it offers any potential advantages over open or laparoscopic colon surgery.OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review was to compare the short-term outcomes of the published robotic colonic surgery with those of laparoscopic colonic surgery.DATA SOURCES: The search was performed in September 2012 with the use of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The search terms used were {"}colorectal,{"} {"}colon,{"} {"}colectomy,{"} and {"}robotic/robot.{"}DATA SELECTION: All studies reporting outcomes on robotic colonic resection were included in the review process. Colonic robotic data were compared with data on the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic colonic surgery from a Cochrane review and 4 main randomized controlled trials.INTERVENTIONS: A comparison was conducted of robotic colonic surgery vs standard laparoscopic colonic surgery.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Short-term outcomes and the complication profile of colonic robotic surgery were compared with conventional multiple-port laparoscopic colonic surgery.RESULTS: Fifteen robotic colonic surgery articles with 351 patients (173 males, 178 females) were considered for analysis. The operative time and financial cost of robotic colonic surgery was greater than standard laparoscopic colonic surgery with comparable short-term outcomes and early postoperative complications profile.CONCLUSIONS: The present evidence on robotic colonic surgery has shown both feasibility and a safety profile comparable to standard laparoscopic colonic surgery. However, operative time and cost were greater in robotic colonic surgery, with no difference in the length of postoperative stay in comparison with standard laparoscopic colonic surgery. Whether the general surgical community should embark on a new learning curve for robotic colonic surgery can only be answered in the light of future studies.",
keywords = "Colon surgery, Laparoscopic, Robotic",
author = "Fung, {Andrew Kai-Yip} and Aly, {Emad H}",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1097/DCR.0b013e318285b810",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "786--796",
journal = "Diseases of the Colon & Rectum",
issn = "0012-3706",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Robotic Colonic Surgery

T2 - Is It Advisable to Commence a New Learning Curve?

AU - Fung, Andrew Kai-Yip

AU - Aly, Emad H

PY - 2013/6

Y1 - 2013/6

N2 - BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery has potential advantages in rectal and pelvic surgery, in which the dissection is performed within a confined operative field. However, the position of robotic colonic surgery remains largely undefined with limited insight of whether it offers any potential advantages over open or laparoscopic colon surgery.OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review was to compare the short-term outcomes of the published robotic colonic surgery with those of laparoscopic colonic surgery.DATA SOURCES: The search was performed in September 2012 with the use of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The search terms used were "colorectal," "colon," "colectomy," and "robotic/robot."DATA SELECTION: All studies reporting outcomes on robotic colonic resection were included in the review process. Colonic robotic data were compared with data on the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic colonic surgery from a Cochrane review and 4 main randomized controlled trials.INTERVENTIONS: A comparison was conducted of robotic colonic surgery vs standard laparoscopic colonic surgery.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Short-term outcomes and the complication profile of colonic robotic surgery were compared with conventional multiple-port laparoscopic colonic surgery.RESULTS: Fifteen robotic colonic surgery articles with 351 patients (173 males, 178 females) were considered for analysis. The operative time and financial cost of robotic colonic surgery was greater than standard laparoscopic colonic surgery with comparable short-term outcomes and early postoperative complications profile.CONCLUSIONS: The present evidence on robotic colonic surgery has shown both feasibility and a safety profile comparable to standard laparoscopic colonic surgery. However, operative time and cost were greater in robotic colonic surgery, with no difference in the length of postoperative stay in comparison with standard laparoscopic colonic surgery. Whether the general surgical community should embark on a new learning curve for robotic colonic surgery can only be answered in the light of future studies.

AB - BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery has potential advantages in rectal and pelvic surgery, in which the dissection is performed within a confined operative field. However, the position of robotic colonic surgery remains largely undefined with limited insight of whether it offers any potential advantages over open or laparoscopic colon surgery.OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review was to compare the short-term outcomes of the published robotic colonic surgery with those of laparoscopic colonic surgery.DATA SOURCES: The search was performed in September 2012 with the use of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The search terms used were "colorectal," "colon," "colectomy," and "robotic/robot."DATA SELECTION: All studies reporting outcomes on robotic colonic resection were included in the review process. Colonic robotic data were compared with data on the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic colonic surgery from a Cochrane review and 4 main randomized controlled trials.INTERVENTIONS: A comparison was conducted of robotic colonic surgery vs standard laparoscopic colonic surgery.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Short-term outcomes and the complication profile of colonic robotic surgery were compared with conventional multiple-port laparoscopic colonic surgery.RESULTS: Fifteen robotic colonic surgery articles with 351 patients (173 males, 178 females) were considered for analysis. The operative time and financial cost of robotic colonic surgery was greater than standard laparoscopic colonic surgery with comparable short-term outcomes and early postoperative complications profile.CONCLUSIONS: The present evidence on robotic colonic surgery has shown both feasibility and a safety profile comparable to standard laparoscopic colonic surgery. However, operative time and cost were greater in robotic colonic surgery, with no difference in the length of postoperative stay in comparison with standard laparoscopic colonic surgery. Whether the general surgical community should embark on a new learning curve for robotic colonic surgery can only be answered in the light of future studies.

KW - Colon surgery

KW - Laparoscopic

KW - Robotic

U2 - 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318285b810

DO - 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318285b810

M3 - Review article

C2 - 23652755

VL - 56

SP - 786

EP - 796

JO - Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

JF - Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

SN - 0012-3706

IS - 6

ER -