Robust Topology Optimization

Minimization of Expected and Variance of Compliance

Peter D. Dunning*, H. Alicia Kim

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Robust topology optimization has long been considered computationally intractable as it combines two highly expensive computational strategies. This paper considers simultaneous minimization of expectancy and variance of compliance in the presence of uncertainties in loading magnitude, using exact formulations and analytically derived sensitivities. It shows that only a few additional load cases are required, which scales in polynomial time with the number of uncertain load cases. The approach is implemented using the level set topology optimization method. Shape sensitivities are derived using the adjoint method. Several examples are used to investigate the effect of including variance in robust compliance optimization.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2656-2664
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Journal
Volume51
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2013

Keywords

  • level-set method
  • structural optimization
  • design
  • uncertainty
  • loads
  • mechanisms

Cite this

Robust Topology Optimization : Minimization of Expected and Variance of Compliance. / Dunning, Peter D.; Kim, H. Alicia.

In: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Journal, Vol. 51, No. 11, 11.2013, p. 2656-2664.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e8d3ca6cffd542aa81b33307284f1618,
title = "Robust Topology Optimization: Minimization of Expected and Variance of Compliance",
abstract = "Robust topology optimization has long been considered computationally intractable as it combines two highly expensive computational strategies. This paper considers simultaneous minimization of expectancy and variance of compliance in the presence of uncertainties in loading magnitude, using exact formulations and analytically derived sensitivities. It shows that only a few additional load cases are required, which scales in polynomial time with the number of uncertain load cases. The approach is implemented using the level set topology optimization method. Shape sensitivities are derived using the adjoint method. Several examples are used to investigate the effect of including variance in robust compliance optimization.",
keywords = "level-set method, structural optimization, design, uncertainty, loads, mechanisms",
author = "Dunning, {Peter D.} and Kim, {H. Alicia}",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
doi = "10.2514/1.J052183",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "2656--2664",
journal = "American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Journal",
issn = "0001-1452",
publisher = "American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc. (AIAA)",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Robust Topology Optimization

T2 - Minimization of Expected and Variance of Compliance

AU - Dunning, Peter D.

AU - Kim, H. Alicia

PY - 2013/11

Y1 - 2013/11

N2 - Robust topology optimization has long been considered computationally intractable as it combines two highly expensive computational strategies. This paper considers simultaneous minimization of expectancy and variance of compliance in the presence of uncertainties in loading magnitude, using exact formulations and analytically derived sensitivities. It shows that only a few additional load cases are required, which scales in polynomial time with the number of uncertain load cases. The approach is implemented using the level set topology optimization method. Shape sensitivities are derived using the adjoint method. Several examples are used to investigate the effect of including variance in robust compliance optimization.

AB - Robust topology optimization has long been considered computationally intractable as it combines two highly expensive computational strategies. This paper considers simultaneous minimization of expectancy and variance of compliance in the presence of uncertainties in loading magnitude, using exact formulations and analytically derived sensitivities. It shows that only a few additional load cases are required, which scales in polynomial time with the number of uncertain load cases. The approach is implemented using the level set topology optimization method. Shape sensitivities are derived using the adjoint method. Several examples are used to investigate the effect of including variance in robust compliance optimization.

KW - level-set method

KW - structural optimization

KW - design

KW - uncertainty

KW - loads

KW - mechanisms

U2 - 10.2514/1.J052183

DO - 10.2514/1.J052183

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 2656

EP - 2664

JO - American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Journal

JF - American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Journal

SN - 0001-1452

IS - 11

ER -