Root colonisation by AM fungi differs between gypsum specialist and non-specialist plants: links to the gypsophile behaviour

S. Palacio, D. Johnson, A. Escudero, G. Montserrat-Marti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Gypsum soils are among the most restrictive substrates for plant life, yet the mechanisms of plant adaptation to gypsum are still poorly understood. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) can improve host plant nutrition and survival in stressful environments but little is known about the ubiquity and function of AMF in plants that grow in gypsum soils, both specialists and generalists. Previous studies indicate that most gypsophiles (specialists) show much higher concentration of nutrients than gypsovags (generalists), hence our hypothesis was that this would be related to increased mycorrhizal colonisation in gypsum specialists. We therefore quantified colonisation of the roots by mycorrhizal arbuscules (AC), vesicles (VC) and hyphae (HC) in six species of gypsophiles and six species of gypsovags growing in gypsum outcrops. Both groups of plants showed significant differences in AC, VC and HC but in contrast to our hypothesis, colonisation was greater in gypsovags than in gypsophiles. The extent of AMF colonisation does not seem to explain the distinctively high nutrient concentrations reported for gypsophiles. Our results indicate that increased AM colonisation could be a mechanism allowing non-specialist plants to cope with the restrictive conditions of gypsum. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)128-132
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Arid Environments
Volume76
Early online date18 Sep 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2012

Keywords

  • arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF)
  • edaphic endemism
  • gypsum soils
  • gypsophiles
  • Mediterranean semi-arid environments
  • Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
  • desert
  • exploitation
  • communities
  • diversity
  • nitrogen
  • soils

Cite this

Root colonisation by AM fungi differs between gypsum specialist and non-specialist plants : links to the gypsophile behaviour. / Palacio, S.; Johnson, D.; Escudero, A.; Montserrat-Marti, G.

In: Journal of Arid Environments, Vol. 76, 01.2012, p. 128-132.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Palacio, S. ; Johnson, D. ; Escudero, A. ; Montserrat-Marti, G. / Root colonisation by AM fungi differs between gypsum specialist and non-specialist plants : links to the gypsophile behaviour. In: Journal of Arid Environments. 2012 ; Vol. 76. pp. 128-132.
@article{d3956e308df24de2b16d13a508edaebb,
title = "Root colonisation by AM fungi differs between gypsum specialist and non-specialist plants: links to the gypsophile behaviour",
abstract = "Gypsum soils are among the most restrictive substrates for plant life, yet the mechanisms of plant adaptation to gypsum are still poorly understood. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) can improve host plant nutrition and survival in stressful environments but little is known about the ubiquity and function of AMF in plants that grow in gypsum soils, both specialists and generalists. Previous studies indicate that most gypsophiles (specialists) show much higher concentration of nutrients than gypsovags (generalists), hence our hypothesis was that this would be related to increased mycorrhizal colonisation in gypsum specialists. We therefore quantified colonisation of the roots by mycorrhizal arbuscules (AC), vesicles (VC) and hyphae (HC) in six species of gypsophiles and six species of gypsovags growing in gypsum outcrops. Both groups of plants showed significant differences in AC, VC and HC but in contrast to our hypothesis, colonisation was greater in gypsovags than in gypsophiles. The extent of AMF colonisation does not seem to explain the distinctively high nutrient concentrations reported for gypsophiles. Our results indicate that increased AM colonisation could be a mechanism allowing non-specialist plants to cope with the restrictive conditions of gypsum. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), edaphic endemism, gypsum soils, gypsophiles, Mediterranean semi-arid environments, Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, desert, exploitation, communities, diversity, nitrogen, soils",
author = "S. Palacio and D. Johnson and A. Escudero and G. Montserrat-Marti",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.08.019",
language = "English",
volume = "76",
pages = "128--132",
journal = "Journal of Arid Environments",
issn = "0140-1963",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Root colonisation by AM fungi differs between gypsum specialist and non-specialist plants

T2 - links to the gypsophile behaviour

AU - Palacio, S.

AU - Johnson, D.

AU - Escudero, A.

AU - Montserrat-Marti, G.

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - Gypsum soils are among the most restrictive substrates for plant life, yet the mechanisms of plant adaptation to gypsum are still poorly understood. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) can improve host plant nutrition and survival in stressful environments but little is known about the ubiquity and function of AMF in plants that grow in gypsum soils, both specialists and generalists. Previous studies indicate that most gypsophiles (specialists) show much higher concentration of nutrients than gypsovags (generalists), hence our hypothesis was that this would be related to increased mycorrhizal colonisation in gypsum specialists. We therefore quantified colonisation of the roots by mycorrhizal arbuscules (AC), vesicles (VC) and hyphae (HC) in six species of gypsophiles and six species of gypsovags growing in gypsum outcrops. Both groups of plants showed significant differences in AC, VC and HC but in contrast to our hypothesis, colonisation was greater in gypsovags than in gypsophiles. The extent of AMF colonisation does not seem to explain the distinctively high nutrient concentrations reported for gypsophiles. Our results indicate that increased AM colonisation could be a mechanism allowing non-specialist plants to cope with the restrictive conditions of gypsum. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

AB - Gypsum soils are among the most restrictive substrates for plant life, yet the mechanisms of plant adaptation to gypsum are still poorly understood. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) can improve host plant nutrition and survival in stressful environments but little is known about the ubiquity and function of AMF in plants that grow in gypsum soils, both specialists and generalists. Previous studies indicate that most gypsophiles (specialists) show much higher concentration of nutrients than gypsovags (generalists), hence our hypothesis was that this would be related to increased mycorrhizal colonisation in gypsum specialists. We therefore quantified colonisation of the roots by mycorrhizal arbuscules (AC), vesicles (VC) and hyphae (HC) in six species of gypsophiles and six species of gypsovags growing in gypsum outcrops. Both groups of plants showed significant differences in AC, VC and HC but in contrast to our hypothesis, colonisation was greater in gypsovags than in gypsophiles. The extent of AMF colonisation does not seem to explain the distinctively high nutrient concentrations reported for gypsophiles. Our results indicate that increased AM colonisation could be a mechanism allowing non-specialist plants to cope with the restrictive conditions of gypsum. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

KW - arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF)

KW - edaphic endemism

KW - gypsum soils

KW - gypsophiles

KW - Mediterranean semi-arid environments

KW - Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi

KW - desert

KW - exploitation

KW - communities

KW - diversity

KW - nitrogen

KW - soils

U2 - 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.08.019

DO - 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.08.019

M3 - Article

VL - 76

SP - 128

EP - 132

JO - Journal of Arid Environments

JF - Journal of Arid Environments

SN - 0140-1963

ER -