Saccadic latency is modulated by emotional content of spatially filtered face stimuli

Rachel Lynne Bannerman, Paul B Hibbard, Kirsty Chalmers, Arash Sahraie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Models of attention and emotion assign a special status to the processing of threat. While evidence for threat-related attentional bias in highly anxious individuals is robust, effects in the normal population are mixed. An important explanation for the absence of threat-related attentional bias in non-anxious individuals may relate to the spatial frequency components of stimuli. Here we report behavioural data from two experiments examining the relationship between spatial frequency components of emotional and neutral faces and fast saccadic orienting behaviour. In Exp.1 participants had to saccade towards a single face, filtered to include mostly low, high or broad spatial frequencies (LSF, HSF or BSF), posing a fearful, happy or neutral expression presented for 20ms in the periphery. At BSF a general emotional effect was found whereby saccadic responses were faster for fearful and happy faces relative to neutral, with no significant differences between fearful and happy faces. At LSF both fearful and happy faces had shorter saccadic latencies in comparison to neutral, demonstrating an emotional bias consistent with the BSF data. However, at LSF fearful faces resulted in significantly faster saccades than happy faces indicating that this bias was stronger for threat-related faces. There was no difference in saccadic responses between any emotions at HSF. Exp.2 showed that the emotional bias diminished for inverted stimuli suggesting that the results were not attributable to low-level image properties. The findings suggest an overall advantage in the oculomotor system for orientation to emotional stimuli and at LSF in particular, a significantly faster localization of threat conveyed by the face stimuli in all individuals.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1384-1392
Number of pages9
JournalEmotion
Volume12
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2012

Fingerprint

Saccades
Emotions
Population
Attentional Bias

Cite this

Saccadic latency is modulated by emotional content of spatially filtered face stimuli. / Bannerman, Rachel Lynne; Hibbard, Paul B; Chalmers, Kirsty; Sahraie, Arash.

In: Emotion, Vol. 12, No. 6, 12.2012, p. 1384-1392.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bannerman, Rachel Lynne ; Hibbard, Paul B ; Chalmers, Kirsty ; Sahraie, Arash. / Saccadic latency is modulated by emotional content of spatially filtered face stimuli. In: Emotion. 2012 ; Vol. 12, No. 6. pp. 1384-1392.
@article{bebfaef6f8c64570a2d610eab5d34bfa,
title = "Saccadic latency is modulated by emotional content of spatially filtered face stimuli",
abstract = "Models of attention and emotion assign a special status to the processing of threat. While evidence for threat-related attentional bias in highly anxious individuals is robust, effects in the normal population are mixed. An important explanation for the absence of threat-related attentional bias in non-anxious individuals may relate to the spatial frequency components of stimuli. Here we report behavioural data from two experiments examining the relationship between spatial frequency components of emotional and neutral faces and fast saccadic orienting behaviour. In Exp.1 participants had to saccade towards a single face, filtered to include mostly low, high or broad spatial frequencies (LSF, HSF or BSF), posing a fearful, happy or neutral expression presented for 20ms in the periphery. At BSF a general emotional effect was found whereby saccadic responses were faster for fearful and happy faces relative to neutral, with no significant differences between fearful and happy faces. At LSF both fearful and happy faces had shorter saccadic latencies in comparison to neutral, demonstrating an emotional bias consistent with the BSF data. However, at LSF fearful faces resulted in significantly faster saccades than happy faces indicating that this bias was stronger for threat-related faces. There was no difference in saccadic responses between any emotions at HSF. Exp.2 showed that the emotional bias diminished for inverted stimuli suggesting that the results were not attributable to low-level image properties. The findings suggest an overall advantage in the oculomotor system for orientation to emotional stimuli and at LSF in particular, a significantly faster localization of threat conveyed by the face stimuli in all individuals.",
author = "Bannerman, {Rachel Lynne} and Hibbard, {Paul B} and Kirsty Chalmers and Arash Sahraie",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1037/a0028677",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "1384--1392",
journal = "Emotion",
issn = "1528-3542",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Saccadic latency is modulated by emotional content of spatially filtered face stimuli

AU - Bannerman, Rachel Lynne

AU - Hibbard, Paul B

AU - Chalmers, Kirsty

AU - Sahraie, Arash

PY - 2012/12

Y1 - 2012/12

N2 - Models of attention and emotion assign a special status to the processing of threat. While evidence for threat-related attentional bias in highly anxious individuals is robust, effects in the normal population are mixed. An important explanation for the absence of threat-related attentional bias in non-anxious individuals may relate to the spatial frequency components of stimuli. Here we report behavioural data from two experiments examining the relationship between spatial frequency components of emotional and neutral faces and fast saccadic orienting behaviour. In Exp.1 participants had to saccade towards a single face, filtered to include mostly low, high or broad spatial frequencies (LSF, HSF or BSF), posing a fearful, happy or neutral expression presented for 20ms in the periphery. At BSF a general emotional effect was found whereby saccadic responses were faster for fearful and happy faces relative to neutral, with no significant differences between fearful and happy faces. At LSF both fearful and happy faces had shorter saccadic latencies in comparison to neutral, demonstrating an emotional bias consistent with the BSF data. However, at LSF fearful faces resulted in significantly faster saccades than happy faces indicating that this bias was stronger for threat-related faces. There was no difference in saccadic responses between any emotions at HSF. Exp.2 showed that the emotional bias diminished for inverted stimuli suggesting that the results were not attributable to low-level image properties. The findings suggest an overall advantage in the oculomotor system for orientation to emotional stimuli and at LSF in particular, a significantly faster localization of threat conveyed by the face stimuli in all individuals.

AB - Models of attention and emotion assign a special status to the processing of threat. While evidence for threat-related attentional bias in highly anxious individuals is robust, effects in the normal population are mixed. An important explanation for the absence of threat-related attentional bias in non-anxious individuals may relate to the spatial frequency components of stimuli. Here we report behavioural data from two experiments examining the relationship between spatial frequency components of emotional and neutral faces and fast saccadic orienting behaviour. In Exp.1 participants had to saccade towards a single face, filtered to include mostly low, high or broad spatial frequencies (LSF, HSF or BSF), posing a fearful, happy or neutral expression presented for 20ms in the periphery. At BSF a general emotional effect was found whereby saccadic responses were faster for fearful and happy faces relative to neutral, with no significant differences between fearful and happy faces. At LSF both fearful and happy faces had shorter saccadic latencies in comparison to neutral, demonstrating an emotional bias consistent with the BSF data. However, at LSF fearful faces resulted in significantly faster saccades than happy faces indicating that this bias was stronger for threat-related faces. There was no difference in saccadic responses between any emotions at HSF. Exp.2 showed that the emotional bias diminished for inverted stimuli suggesting that the results were not attributable to low-level image properties. The findings suggest an overall advantage in the oculomotor system for orientation to emotional stimuli and at LSF in particular, a significantly faster localization of threat conveyed by the face stimuli in all individuals.

U2 - 10.1037/a0028677

DO - 10.1037/a0028677

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 1384

EP - 1392

JO - Emotion

JF - Emotion

SN - 1528-3542

IS - 6

ER -