Schleiermacher and Reformed Scholastics on the Divine Attributes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Schleiermacher’s doctrine of the divine attributes has been controversial
from its day until the present, with various nineteenth- and twentieth century
figures seeing it as a theological novum. Recent work has clarified
Schleiermacher’s understanding of the status of the attributes, challenging the
simplistic readings of his critics. However, the charge of novelty still has not
been addressed. I argue in response to this charge that Schleiermacher’s doctrine
is best explained as an inheritance of the Reformed tradition. Not only is
Schleiermacher’s doctrine of the divine attributes nearly identical to that of his
Reformed Scholastic predecessors, but Schleiermacher holds the same
conceptions for the same reasons.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)413-431
Number of pages19
JournalInternational Journal of Systematic Theology
Volume17
Issue number4
Early online date12 Aug 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2015

Fingerprint

Friedrich Schleiermacher
Divine Attributes
Scholastics
Doctrine
Novelty
Reformed Tradition

Cite this

Schleiermacher and Reformed Scholastics on the Divine Attributes. / Pedersen, Daniel J.

In: International Journal of Systematic Theology, Vol. 17, No. 4, 10.2015, p. 413-431.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d7c9aed530c140909c8174f516495d1d,
title = "Schleiermacher and Reformed Scholastics on the Divine Attributes",
abstract = "Schleiermacher’s doctrine of the divine attributes has been controversialfrom its day until the present, with various nineteenth- and twentieth centuryfigures seeing it as a theological novum. Recent work has clarifiedSchleiermacher’s understanding of the status of the attributes, challenging thesimplistic readings of his critics. However, the charge of novelty still has notbeen addressed. I argue in response to this charge that Schleiermacher’s doctrineis best explained as an inheritance of the Reformed tradition. Not only isSchleiermacher’s doctrine of the divine attributes nearly identical to that of hisReformed Scholastic predecessors, but Schleiermacher holds the sameconceptions for the same reasons.",
author = "Pedersen, {Daniel J}",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1111/ijst.12120",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "413--431",
journal = "International Journal of Systematic Theology",
issn = "1463-1652",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Schleiermacher and Reformed Scholastics on the Divine Attributes

AU - Pedersen, Daniel J

PY - 2015/10

Y1 - 2015/10

N2 - Schleiermacher’s doctrine of the divine attributes has been controversialfrom its day until the present, with various nineteenth- and twentieth centuryfigures seeing it as a theological novum. Recent work has clarifiedSchleiermacher’s understanding of the status of the attributes, challenging thesimplistic readings of his critics. However, the charge of novelty still has notbeen addressed. I argue in response to this charge that Schleiermacher’s doctrineis best explained as an inheritance of the Reformed tradition. Not only isSchleiermacher’s doctrine of the divine attributes nearly identical to that of hisReformed Scholastic predecessors, but Schleiermacher holds the sameconceptions for the same reasons.

AB - Schleiermacher’s doctrine of the divine attributes has been controversialfrom its day until the present, with various nineteenth- and twentieth centuryfigures seeing it as a theological novum. Recent work has clarifiedSchleiermacher’s understanding of the status of the attributes, challenging thesimplistic readings of his critics. However, the charge of novelty still has notbeen addressed. I argue in response to this charge that Schleiermacher’s doctrineis best explained as an inheritance of the Reformed tradition. Not only isSchleiermacher’s doctrine of the divine attributes nearly identical to that of hisReformed Scholastic predecessors, but Schleiermacher holds the sameconceptions for the same reasons.

U2 - 10.1111/ijst.12120

DO - 10.1111/ijst.12120

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 413

EP - 431

JO - International Journal of Systematic Theology

JF - International Journal of Systematic Theology

SN - 1463-1652

IS - 4

ER -