Science policies

How should science funding be allocated? An evolutionary biologists' perspective

Stephanie Meirmans (Corresponding Author), Roger K Butlin, Anne Charmantier, Jan Engelstädter, Astrid T Groot, Kayla C King, Hanna Kokko, Jane M Reid, Maurine Neiman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In an ideal world, funding agencies could identify the best scientists and projects and provide them with the resources to undertake these projects. Most scientists would agree that in practice, how funding for scientific research is allocated is far from ideal and likely compromises research quality. We, nine evolutionary biologists from different countries and career stages, provide a comparative summary of our impressions on funding strategies for evolutionary biology across eleven different funding agencies. We also assess whether and how funding effectiveness might be improved. We focused this assessment on 14 elements within four broad categories: (1) topical shaping of science, (2) distribution of funds, (3) application and review procedures, and (4) incentives for funding and diversity. These comparisons revealed striking among-country variation in those elements, including wide variation in funding rates, the effort and burden required for grant applications, and the extent of emphasis on societal relevance and individual mobility. We use these observations to provide constructive suggestions for the future, and urge the need to further gather informed considerations from scientists on the effects of funding policies on science across countries and research fields. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)754-768
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Evolutionary Biology
Volume32
Issue number8
Early online date5 Jul 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2019

Fingerprint

funding
biologists
evolutionary biology
incentive
resource
project
policy
science
Biological Sciences
distribution
effect
rate
comparison
scientific research

Keywords

  • funding
  • funding rate
  • grant proposal
  • science policy
  • scientific quality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Meirmans, S., Butlin, R. K., Charmantier, A., Engelstädter, J., Groot, A. T., King, K. C., ... Neiman, M. (2019). Science policies: How should science funding be allocated? An evolutionary biologists' perspective. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 32(8), 754-768. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13497

Science policies : How should science funding be allocated? An evolutionary biologists' perspective. / Meirmans, Stephanie (Corresponding Author); Butlin, Roger K; Charmantier, Anne; Engelstädter, Jan; Groot, Astrid T; King, Kayla C; Kokko, Hanna; Reid, Jane M; Neiman, Maurine.

In: Journal of Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 32, No. 8, 08.2019, p. 754-768.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Meirmans, S, Butlin, RK, Charmantier, A, Engelstädter, J, Groot, AT, King, KC, Kokko, H, Reid, JM & Neiman, M 2019, 'Science policies: How should science funding be allocated? An evolutionary biologists' perspective', Journal of Evolutionary Biology, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 754-768. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13497
Meirmans S, Butlin RK, Charmantier A, Engelstädter J, Groot AT, King KC et al. Science policies: How should science funding be allocated? An evolutionary biologists' perspective. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 2019 Aug;32(8):754-768. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13497
Meirmans, Stephanie ; Butlin, Roger K ; Charmantier, Anne ; Engelstädter, Jan ; Groot, Astrid T ; King, Kayla C ; Kokko, Hanna ; Reid, Jane M ; Neiman, Maurine. / Science policies : How should science funding be allocated? An evolutionary biologists' perspective. In: Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 2019 ; Vol. 32, No. 8. pp. 754-768.
@article{53a1163d798f468dab6d0fdcf15d8caa,
title = "Science policies: How should science funding be allocated? An evolutionary biologists' perspective",
abstract = "In an ideal world, funding agencies could identify the best scientists and projects and provide them with the resources to undertake these projects. Most scientists would agree that in practice, how funding for scientific research is allocated is far from ideal and likely compromises research quality. We, nine evolutionary biologists from different countries and career stages, provide a comparative summary of our impressions on funding strategies for evolutionary biology across eleven different funding agencies. We also assess whether and how funding effectiveness might be improved. We focused this assessment on 14 elements within four broad categories: (1) topical shaping of science, (2) distribution of funds, (3) application and review procedures, and (4) incentives for funding and diversity. These comparisons revealed striking among-country variation in those elements, including wide variation in funding rates, the effort and burden required for grant applications, and the extent of emphasis on societal relevance and individual mobility. We use these observations to provide constructive suggestions for the future, and urge the need to further gather informed considerations from scientists on the effects of funding policies on science across countries and research fields. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "funding, funding rate, grant proposal, science policy, scientific quality",
author = "Stephanie Meirmans and Butlin, {Roger K} and Anne Charmantier and Jan Engelst{\"a}dter and Groot, {Astrid T} and King, {Kayla C} and Hanna Kokko and Reid, {Jane M} and Maurine Neiman",
note = "Funding Information American Genetic Association European Society for Evolutionary Biology European Research Council Australian Research Council The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1111/jeb.13497",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "754--768",
journal = "Journal of Evolutionary Biology",
issn = "1010-061X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Science policies

T2 - How should science funding be allocated? An evolutionary biologists' perspective

AU - Meirmans, Stephanie

AU - Butlin, Roger K

AU - Charmantier, Anne

AU - Engelstädter, Jan

AU - Groot, Astrid T

AU - King, Kayla C

AU - Kokko, Hanna

AU - Reid, Jane M

AU - Neiman, Maurine

N1 - Funding Information American Genetic Association European Society for Evolutionary Biology European Research Council Australian Research Council The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development

PY - 2019/8

Y1 - 2019/8

N2 - In an ideal world, funding agencies could identify the best scientists and projects and provide them with the resources to undertake these projects. Most scientists would agree that in practice, how funding for scientific research is allocated is far from ideal and likely compromises research quality. We, nine evolutionary biologists from different countries and career stages, provide a comparative summary of our impressions on funding strategies for evolutionary biology across eleven different funding agencies. We also assess whether and how funding effectiveness might be improved. We focused this assessment on 14 elements within four broad categories: (1) topical shaping of science, (2) distribution of funds, (3) application and review procedures, and (4) incentives for funding and diversity. These comparisons revealed striking among-country variation in those elements, including wide variation in funding rates, the effort and burden required for grant applications, and the extent of emphasis on societal relevance and individual mobility. We use these observations to provide constructive suggestions for the future, and urge the need to further gather informed considerations from scientists on the effects of funding policies on science across countries and research fields. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

AB - In an ideal world, funding agencies could identify the best scientists and projects and provide them with the resources to undertake these projects. Most scientists would agree that in practice, how funding for scientific research is allocated is far from ideal and likely compromises research quality. We, nine evolutionary biologists from different countries and career stages, provide a comparative summary of our impressions on funding strategies for evolutionary biology across eleven different funding agencies. We also assess whether and how funding effectiveness might be improved. We focused this assessment on 14 elements within four broad categories: (1) topical shaping of science, (2) distribution of funds, (3) application and review procedures, and (4) incentives for funding and diversity. These comparisons revealed striking among-country variation in those elements, including wide variation in funding rates, the effort and burden required for grant applications, and the extent of emphasis on societal relevance and individual mobility. We use these observations to provide constructive suggestions for the future, and urge the need to further gather informed considerations from scientists on the effects of funding policies on science across countries and research fields. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

KW - funding

KW - funding rate

KW - grant proposal

KW - science policy

KW - scientific quality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068596818&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/science-policies-science-funding-allocated-evolutionary-biologists-perspective

U2 - 10.1111/jeb.13497

DO - 10.1111/jeb.13497

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 754

EP - 768

JO - Journal of Evolutionary Biology

JF - Journal of Evolutionary Biology

SN - 1010-061X

IS - 8

ER -