Scottish criminal evidence law adrift?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

In a controversial book, Evidence Law Adrift, Damaska, probably the
most influential, contemporary theorist of comparative criminal procedure,
claimed that the law of criminal evidence in Anglo-American
common law systems had lost its moorings in its traditional adversarial ideology.1 To what extent is this true of Scottish criminal evidence law? This collection demonstrates that over the past twenty years or so, Scots law in this area has undergone unprecedented change and is, in the eyes of many practitioners and commentators, in a state of flux. The issue to be tackled in this chapter is whether any pattern to this change can be discerned and any future direction of development identified. On first sight, it might be argued that the process of change has simply been a chaotic result of new pressures, such as the rise of the victim movement, the incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) into Scots law, the attempt to rationalise and modernise the law, and the need to husband scarce resources and increase
efficiency, all combined with various knee-jerk political responses to high-profile cases and more general political pressures. This might lead to the conclusion that the law has indeed cast free of its adversarial anchorage and that there is little point in trying to predict the future. In my opinion, however,
the latter view is rather too pessimistic2 and it might be possible to foresee,
somewhat indistinctly, the future evolution, rather than total revolution, of
Scottish criminal evidence law.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationScottish Criminal Evidence Law
Subtitle of host publicationCurrent Developments and Future Trends
EditorsPeter Duff, Pamela R Ferguson
Place of PublicationEdinburgh
PublisherEdinburgh University Press
Pages224-247
Number of pages24
ISBN (Electronic)9781474414791, 9781474414777
ISBN (Print)9781474414760
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2017

Fingerprint

Law
evidence
criminal procedure
ECHR
husband
resources

Keywords

  • Criminal evidence

Cite this

Duff, P. R. (2017). Scottish criminal evidence law adrift? In P. Duff, & P. R. Ferguson (Eds.), Scottish Criminal Evidence Law: Current Developments and Future Trends (pp. 224-247). [Chapter 9] Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Scottish criminal evidence law adrift? / Duff, Peter Robert.

Scottish Criminal Evidence Law: Current Developments and Future Trends. ed. / Peter Duff; Pamela R Ferguson. Edinburgh : Edinburgh University Press, 2017. p. 224-247 Chapter 9.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Duff, PR 2017, Scottish criminal evidence law adrift? in P Duff & PR Ferguson (eds), Scottish Criminal Evidence Law: Current Developments and Future Trends., Chapter 9, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp. 224-247.
Duff PR. Scottish criminal evidence law adrift? In Duff P, Ferguson PR, editors, Scottish Criminal Evidence Law: Current Developments and Future Trends. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 2017. p. 224-247. Chapter 9
Duff, Peter Robert. / Scottish criminal evidence law adrift?. Scottish Criminal Evidence Law: Current Developments and Future Trends. editor / Peter Duff ; Pamela R Ferguson. Edinburgh : Edinburgh University Press, 2017. pp. 224-247
@inbook{333afd60c91e44d2913ddd15b43f6301,
title = "Scottish criminal evidence law adrift?",
abstract = "In a controversial book, Evidence Law Adrift, Damaska, probably themost influential, contemporary theorist of comparative criminal procedure,claimed that the law of criminal evidence in Anglo-Americancommon law systems had lost its moorings in its traditional adversarial ideology.1 To what extent is this true of Scottish criminal evidence law? This collection demonstrates that over the past twenty years or so, Scots law in this area has undergone unprecedented change and is, in the eyes of many practitioners and commentators, in a state of flux. The issue to be tackled in this chapter is whether any pattern to this change can be discerned and any future direction of development identified. On first sight, it might be argued that the process of change has simply been a chaotic result of new pressures, such as the rise of the victim movement, the incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) into Scots law, the attempt to rationalise and modernise the law, and the need to husband scarce resources and increaseefficiency, all combined with various knee-jerk political responses to high-profile cases and more general political pressures. This might lead to the conclusion that the law has indeed cast free of its adversarial anchorage and that there is little point in trying to predict the future. In my opinion, however,the latter view is rather too pessimistic2 and it might be possible to foresee,somewhat indistinctly, the future evolution, rather than total revolution, ofScottish criminal evidence law.",
keywords = "Criminal evidence",
author = "Duff, {Peter Robert}",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781474414760",
pages = "224--247",
editor = "Peter Duff and Ferguson, {Pamela R}",
booktitle = "Scottish Criminal Evidence Law",
publisher = "Edinburgh University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Scottish criminal evidence law adrift?

AU - Duff, Peter Robert

PY - 2017/11

Y1 - 2017/11

N2 - In a controversial book, Evidence Law Adrift, Damaska, probably themost influential, contemporary theorist of comparative criminal procedure,claimed that the law of criminal evidence in Anglo-Americancommon law systems had lost its moorings in its traditional adversarial ideology.1 To what extent is this true of Scottish criminal evidence law? This collection demonstrates that over the past twenty years or so, Scots law in this area has undergone unprecedented change and is, in the eyes of many practitioners and commentators, in a state of flux. The issue to be tackled in this chapter is whether any pattern to this change can be discerned and any future direction of development identified. On first sight, it might be argued that the process of change has simply been a chaotic result of new pressures, such as the rise of the victim movement, the incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) into Scots law, the attempt to rationalise and modernise the law, and the need to husband scarce resources and increaseefficiency, all combined with various knee-jerk political responses to high-profile cases and more general political pressures. This might lead to the conclusion that the law has indeed cast free of its adversarial anchorage and that there is little point in trying to predict the future. In my opinion, however,the latter view is rather too pessimistic2 and it might be possible to foresee,somewhat indistinctly, the future evolution, rather than total revolution, ofScottish criminal evidence law.

AB - In a controversial book, Evidence Law Adrift, Damaska, probably themost influential, contemporary theorist of comparative criminal procedure,claimed that the law of criminal evidence in Anglo-Americancommon law systems had lost its moorings in its traditional adversarial ideology.1 To what extent is this true of Scottish criminal evidence law? This collection demonstrates that over the past twenty years or so, Scots law in this area has undergone unprecedented change and is, in the eyes of many practitioners and commentators, in a state of flux. The issue to be tackled in this chapter is whether any pattern to this change can be discerned and any future direction of development identified. On first sight, it might be argued that the process of change has simply been a chaotic result of new pressures, such as the rise of the victim movement, the incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) into Scots law, the attempt to rationalise and modernise the law, and the need to husband scarce resources and increaseefficiency, all combined with various knee-jerk political responses to high-profile cases and more general political pressures. This might lead to the conclusion that the law has indeed cast free of its adversarial anchorage and that there is little point in trying to predict the future. In my opinion, however,the latter view is rather too pessimistic2 and it might be possible to foresee,somewhat indistinctly, the future evolution, rather than total revolution, ofScottish criminal evidence law.

KW - Criminal evidence

UR - https://edinburghuniversitypress.com/book-scottish-criminal-evidence-law-hb.html

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781474414760

SP - 224

EP - 247

BT - Scottish Criminal Evidence Law

A2 - Duff, Peter

A2 - Ferguson, Pamela R

PB - Edinburgh University Press

CY - Edinburgh

ER -