Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in a geographically isolated area

J. L. Duncan, B. Wolf, D. M. Nichols, Sandra Lindsay, John Alexander Cairns, David John Godden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm has been shown to reduce aneurysm-related mortality, but the applicability of the results to the whole of the UK has been questioned. This study examined screening in a remote and rural area.

Methods: Over 3 years, men aged 65-74 years were offered screening in the community by ultrasonography, usually in general practitioner surgeries. Men with an aneurysm were rescanned at intervals or assessed for surgery. The screening and hospital costs of the programme were calculated.

Results: Some 9323 men were offered screening of whom 8355 (89.6 per cent) attended. Uptake was high in all areas. A total of 430 scans (5.1 per cent) were abnormal; 40 men had an aneurysm greater than 55 nun in diameter. Twenty further men had an aorta that enlarged to greater than 55 mm during follow-up. A total of 54 men had elective repair with one death (mortality rate 2 per cent). The cost of screening alone was 16 pound per invitation and the overall cost of the programme, including surgery, was 258 per invitation.

Conclusion: Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm can be carried out in a remote and rural area with high uptake, acceptable clinical results and at no greater cost than in more densely populated areas.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)984-988
Number of pages4
JournalBritish Journal of Surgery
Volume92
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2005

Keywords

  • RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL
  • MORTALITY-RATE
  • COST
  • MEN
  • MASS

Cite this

Duncan, J. L., Wolf, B., Nichols, D. M., Lindsay, S., Cairns, J. A., & Godden, D. J. (2005). Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in a geographically isolated area. British Journal of Surgery, 92(7), 984-988. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5120

Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in a geographically isolated area. / Duncan, J. L.; Wolf, B.; Nichols, D. M.; Lindsay, Sandra; Cairns, John Alexander; Godden, David John.

In: British Journal of Surgery, Vol. 92, No. 7, 07.2005, p. 984-988.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Duncan, JL, Wolf, B, Nichols, DM, Lindsay, S, Cairns, JA & Godden, DJ 2005, 'Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in a geographically isolated area', British Journal of Surgery, vol. 92, no. 7, pp. 984-988. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5120
Duncan JL, Wolf B, Nichols DM, Lindsay S, Cairns JA, Godden DJ. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in a geographically isolated area. British Journal of Surgery. 2005 Jul;92(7):984-988. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5120
Duncan, J. L. ; Wolf, B. ; Nichols, D. M. ; Lindsay, Sandra ; Cairns, John Alexander ; Godden, David John. / Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in a geographically isolated area. In: British Journal of Surgery. 2005 ; Vol. 92, No. 7. pp. 984-988.
@article{ef281db067d84ef6ac065f3a04dd6c80,
title = "Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in a geographically isolated area",
abstract = "Background: Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm has been shown to reduce aneurysm-related mortality, but the applicability of the results to the whole of the UK has been questioned. This study examined screening in a remote and rural area.Methods: Over 3 years, men aged 65-74 years were offered screening in the community by ultrasonography, usually in general practitioner surgeries. Men with an aneurysm were rescanned at intervals or assessed for surgery. The screening and hospital costs of the programme were calculated.Results: Some 9323 men were offered screening of whom 8355 (89.6 per cent) attended. Uptake was high in all areas. A total of 430 scans (5.1 per cent) were abnormal; 40 men had an aneurysm greater than 55 nun in diameter. Twenty further men had an aorta that enlarged to greater than 55 mm during follow-up. A total of 54 men had elective repair with one death (mortality rate 2 per cent). The cost of screening alone was 16 pound per invitation and the overall cost of the programme, including surgery, was 258 per invitation.Conclusion: Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm can be carried out in a remote and rural area with high uptake, acceptable clinical results and at no greater cost than in more densely populated areas.",
keywords = "RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL, MORTALITY-RATE, COST, MEN, MASS",
author = "Duncan, {J. L.} and B. Wolf and Nichols, {D. M.} and Sandra Lindsay and Cairns, {John Alexander} and Godden, {David John}",
year = "2005",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1002/bjs.5120",
language = "English",
volume = "92",
pages = "984--988",
journal = "British Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0007-1323",
publisher = "British Journal of Surgery",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in a geographically isolated area

AU - Duncan, J. L.

AU - Wolf, B.

AU - Nichols, D. M.

AU - Lindsay, Sandra

AU - Cairns, John Alexander

AU - Godden, David John

PY - 2005/7

Y1 - 2005/7

N2 - Background: Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm has been shown to reduce aneurysm-related mortality, but the applicability of the results to the whole of the UK has been questioned. This study examined screening in a remote and rural area.Methods: Over 3 years, men aged 65-74 years were offered screening in the community by ultrasonography, usually in general practitioner surgeries. Men with an aneurysm were rescanned at intervals or assessed for surgery. The screening and hospital costs of the programme were calculated.Results: Some 9323 men were offered screening of whom 8355 (89.6 per cent) attended. Uptake was high in all areas. A total of 430 scans (5.1 per cent) were abnormal; 40 men had an aneurysm greater than 55 nun in diameter. Twenty further men had an aorta that enlarged to greater than 55 mm during follow-up. A total of 54 men had elective repair with one death (mortality rate 2 per cent). The cost of screening alone was 16 pound per invitation and the overall cost of the programme, including surgery, was 258 per invitation.Conclusion: Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm can be carried out in a remote and rural area with high uptake, acceptable clinical results and at no greater cost than in more densely populated areas.

AB - Background: Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm has been shown to reduce aneurysm-related mortality, but the applicability of the results to the whole of the UK has been questioned. This study examined screening in a remote and rural area.Methods: Over 3 years, men aged 65-74 years were offered screening in the community by ultrasonography, usually in general practitioner surgeries. Men with an aneurysm were rescanned at intervals or assessed for surgery. The screening and hospital costs of the programme were calculated.Results: Some 9323 men were offered screening of whom 8355 (89.6 per cent) attended. Uptake was high in all areas. A total of 430 scans (5.1 per cent) were abnormal; 40 men had an aneurysm greater than 55 nun in diameter. Twenty further men had an aorta that enlarged to greater than 55 mm during follow-up. A total of 54 men had elective repair with one death (mortality rate 2 per cent). The cost of screening alone was 16 pound per invitation and the overall cost of the programme, including surgery, was 258 per invitation.Conclusion: Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm can be carried out in a remote and rural area with high uptake, acceptable clinical results and at no greater cost than in more densely populated areas.

KW - RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL

KW - MORTALITY-RATE

KW - COST

KW - MEN

KW - MASS

U2 - 10.1002/bjs.5120

DO - 10.1002/bjs.5120

M3 - Article

VL - 92

SP - 984

EP - 988

JO - British Journal of Surgery

JF - British Journal of Surgery

SN - 0007-1323

IS - 7

ER -