Securitization of the Unemployed and Counter-Conductive Resistance in Tunisia

Saerom Han* (Corresponding Author)

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    While resistance has been increasingly studied in critical security studies, its role has been mainly understood as either a deconstructive or a reconstructive force in processes of securitization owing to the perceived externality of resistance to domination. By contributing to the governmentality approach to security with Foucault’s concept of counter-conduct, this article aims to explicate a particular mode of resistance in which the securitized subject resists, not by refusing the status of being securitized, but by counter-securitizing the self. In doing so, the article shows how dominating and resisting actors mutually construct a particular issue as security. The utility of the concept of counter-conduct is empirically examined via the case of Tunisia, where the unemployed have been securitized in the context of counter-terrorism since the 2011 uprising. By analysing the narratives of the ruling elites and unemployed protesters collected from local news, Facebook posts and semi-structured interviews conducted by the author between 2016 and 2017, the article illustrates how protesters actively participated in the securitization of the unemployed in order that they might be able to continue their socio-economic struggle and position their right to work as the most efficient way of fighting terrorism.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)156-173
    Number of pages18
    JournalSecurity Dialogue
    Volume52
    Issue number2
    Early online date8 Jul 2020
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2021

    Keywords

    • counter-conducts
    • critical security studies
    • Foucault
    • protest
    • resistance
    • Tunisia

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Securitization of the Unemployed and Counter-Conductive Resistance in Tunisia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this