Security Forces and Sexual Violence: A Cross-National Analysis of a Principal-Agent Argument

Christopher K. Butler, Tali Gluch, Neil James Mitchell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

62 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article investigates sexual violence committed by government security forces. It focuses on the issue of delegation. It uses principal-agent logic to understand sexual violence committed by these forces and to set up a cross- national empirical analysis. The article provides an approach to measuring the amount of agent discretion in a political system and an analysis of new cross-national data on the incidence of rape and sexual violence committed by police and security forces. It is argued that sexual violence is a category of human rights violation that is more likely to be attributable to the selfish motivations of agents, and it is an act that is likely to be hidden. This article identifies the conditions under which these acts are most likely to occur as conditions of conflict, system-wide slack bureaucratic control, and where there are constraints on information and organization. The theoretical argument makes sense of earlier findings in the human rights literature, such as the importance of democracy and conflict, while directing attention to motivations, accountability, and, for the first time in systematic analyses of human rights, to the particular issue of sexual violence. The use of cross-national data on the incidence of sexual violence for the year 2003 provides preliminary support for the theoretical argument. After controlling for factors likely to increase the incidence of sexual violence, such as military size and ethnic fractionalization, it is found that, where agents are more accountable and subject to tighter control, sexual violence is less likely. Finally, the article points to the importance of additional data collection over time, consistent with other human rights and conflict datasets, and draws out some policy implications following from the theoretical argument and analysis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)669-687
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Peace Research
Volume44
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2007

Keywords

  • human-rights
  • political repression
  • developing-countries
  • personal integrity
  • corruption
  • government
  • war
  • difference
  • democracy
  • respect

Cite this

Security Forces and Sexual Violence : A Cross-National Analysis of a Principal-Agent Argument. / Butler, Christopher K.; Gluch, Tali; Mitchell, Neil James.

In: Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 44, No. 6, 11.2007, p. 669-687.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Butler, Christopher K. ; Gluch, Tali ; Mitchell, Neil James. / Security Forces and Sexual Violence : A Cross-National Analysis of a Principal-Agent Argument. In: Journal of Peace Research. 2007 ; Vol. 44, No. 6. pp. 669-687.
@article{7b566696b28341dea9d65856ef5e4c04,
title = "Security Forces and Sexual Violence: A Cross-National Analysis of a Principal-Agent Argument",
abstract = "This article investigates sexual violence committed by government security forces. It focuses on the issue of delegation. It uses principal-agent logic to understand sexual violence committed by these forces and to set up a cross- national empirical analysis. The article provides an approach to measuring the amount of agent discretion in a political system and an analysis of new cross-national data on the incidence of rape and sexual violence committed by police and security forces. It is argued that sexual violence is a category of human rights violation that is more likely to be attributable to the selfish motivations of agents, and it is an act that is likely to be hidden. This article identifies the conditions under which these acts are most likely to occur as conditions of conflict, system-wide slack bureaucratic control, and where there are constraints on information and organization. The theoretical argument makes sense of earlier findings in the human rights literature, such as the importance of democracy and conflict, while directing attention to motivations, accountability, and, for the first time in systematic analyses of human rights, to the particular issue of sexual violence. The use of cross-national data on the incidence of sexual violence for the year 2003 provides preliminary support for the theoretical argument. After controlling for factors likely to increase the incidence of sexual violence, such as military size and ethnic fractionalization, it is found that, where agents are more accountable and subject to tighter control, sexual violence is less likely. Finally, the article points to the importance of additional data collection over time, consistent with other human rights and conflict datasets, and draws out some policy implications following from the theoretical argument and analysis.",
keywords = "human-rights, political repression, developing-countries, personal integrity, corruption, government, war, difference, democracy, respect",
author = "Butler, {Christopher K.} and Tali Gluch and Mitchell, {Neil James}",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1177/0022343307082058",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "669--687",
journal = "Journal of Peace Research",
issn = "0022-3433",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Security Forces and Sexual Violence

T2 - A Cross-National Analysis of a Principal-Agent Argument

AU - Butler, Christopher K.

AU - Gluch, Tali

AU - Mitchell, Neil James

PY - 2007/11

Y1 - 2007/11

N2 - This article investigates sexual violence committed by government security forces. It focuses on the issue of delegation. It uses principal-agent logic to understand sexual violence committed by these forces and to set up a cross- national empirical analysis. The article provides an approach to measuring the amount of agent discretion in a political system and an analysis of new cross-national data on the incidence of rape and sexual violence committed by police and security forces. It is argued that sexual violence is a category of human rights violation that is more likely to be attributable to the selfish motivations of agents, and it is an act that is likely to be hidden. This article identifies the conditions under which these acts are most likely to occur as conditions of conflict, system-wide slack bureaucratic control, and where there are constraints on information and organization. The theoretical argument makes sense of earlier findings in the human rights literature, such as the importance of democracy and conflict, while directing attention to motivations, accountability, and, for the first time in systematic analyses of human rights, to the particular issue of sexual violence. The use of cross-national data on the incidence of sexual violence for the year 2003 provides preliminary support for the theoretical argument. After controlling for factors likely to increase the incidence of sexual violence, such as military size and ethnic fractionalization, it is found that, where agents are more accountable and subject to tighter control, sexual violence is less likely. Finally, the article points to the importance of additional data collection over time, consistent with other human rights and conflict datasets, and draws out some policy implications following from the theoretical argument and analysis.

AB - This article investigates sexual violence committed by government security forces. It focuses on the issue of delegation. It uses principal-agent logic to understand sexual violence committed by these forces and to set up a cross- national empirical analysis. The article provides an approach to measuring the amount of agent discretion in a political system and an analysis of new cross-national data on the incidence of rape and sexual violence committed by police and security forces. It is argued that sexual violence is a category of human rights violation that is more likely to be attributable to the selfish motivations of agents, and it is an act that is likely to be hidden. This article identifies the conditions under which these acts are most likely to occur as conditions of conflict, system-wide slack bureaucratic control, and where there are constraints on information and organization. The theoretical argument makes sense of earlier findings in the human rights literature, such as the importance of democracy and conflict, while directing attention to motivations, accountability, and, for the first time in systematic analyses of human rights, to the particular issue of sexual violence. The use of cross-national data on the incidence of sexual violence for the year 2003 provides preliminary support for the theoretical argument. After controlling for factors likely to increase the incidence of sexual violence, such as military size and ethnic fractionalization, it is found that, where agents are more accountable and subject to tighter control, sexual violence is less likely. Finally, the article points to the importance of additional data collection over time, consistent with other human rights and conflict datasets, and draws out some policy implications following from the theoretical argument and analysis.

KW - human-rights

KW - political repression

KW - developing-countries

KW - personal integrity

KW - corruption

KW - government

KW - war

KW - difference

KW - democracy

KW - respect

U2 - 10.1177/0022343307082058

DO - 10.1177/0022343307082058

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 669

EP - 687

JO - Journal of Peace Research

JF - Journal of Peace Research

SN - 0022-3433

IS - 6

ER -