Seeing the unexpected

Counter-stereotypes are implicitly bad

Natasha Flannigan, Lynden K. Miles, Susanne Quadflieg, Neil Macrae

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Through a combination of social change and legislative initiatives, the workplace has been transformed from a rigidly stereotypical environment (i.e., with males and females occupying distinct roles) to an arena that offers equality and opportunity for all. Regrettably, however, individuals who perform traditionally counter-stereotypical roles (e.g., male nurses, female pilots) continue to experience significant disadvantage and dissatisfaction. Why then is this this case? The authors explore the possibility that this may be due, at least in part, to unexpected events that trigger implicit negative associations. The results of two experiments support this hypothesis. Individuals depicted in counter-stereotypical roles activated negative evaluative responses, an effect that was most pronounced for male targets. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are considered.


Read More: http://guilfordjournals.com/doi/abs/10.1521/soco.2013.31.6.712
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)712-720
Number of pages9
JournalSocial Cognition
Volume31
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Male Nurses
Social Change
Workplace
Pilots

Cite this

Seeing the unexpected : Counter-stereotypes are implicitly bad. / Flannigan, Natasha; Miles, Lynden K.; Quadflieg, Susanne; Macrae, Neil.

In: Social Cognition, Vol. 31, No. 6, 2013, p. 712-720.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Flannigan, Natasha ; Miles, Lynden K. ; Quadflieg, Susanne ; Macrae, Neil. / Seeing the unexpected : Counter-stereotypes are implicitly bad. In: Social Cognition. 2013 ; Vol. 31, No. 6. pp. 712-720.
@article{3f3ffd437b614890a2ae675699cca9c4,
title = "Seeing the unexpected: Counter-stereotypes are implicitly bad",
abstract = "Through a combination of social change and legislative initiatives, the workplace has been transformed from a rigidly stereotypical environment (i.e., with males and females occupying distinct roles) to an arena that offers equality and opportunity for all. Regrettably, however, individuals who perform traditionally counter-stereotypical roles (e.g., male nurses, female pilots) continue to experience significant disadvantage and dissatisfaction. Why then is this this case? The authors explore the possibility that this may be due, at least in part, to unexpected events that trigger implicit negative associations. The results of two experiments support this hypothesis. Individuals depicted in counter-stereotypical roles activated negative evaluative responses, an effect that was most pronounced for male targets. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are considered.Read More: http://guilfordjournals.com/doi/abs/10.1521/soco.2013.31.6.712",
author = "Natasha Flannigan and Miles, {Lynden K.} and Susanne Quadflieg and Neil Macrae",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1521/soco.2013.31.6.712",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "712--720",
journal = "Social Cognition",
issn = "0278-016X",
publisher = "Guilford Publications",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Seeing the unexpected

T2 - Counter-stereotypes are implicitly bad

AU - Flannigan, Natasha

AU - Miles, Lynden K.

AU - Quadflieg, Susanne

AU - Macrae, Neil

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Through a combination of social change and legislative initiatives, the workplace has been transformed from a rigidly stereotypical environment (i.e., with males and females occupying distinct roles) to an arena that offers equality and opportunity for all. Regrettably, however, individuals who perform traditionally counter-stereotypical roles (e.g., male nurses, female pilots) continue to experience significant disadvantage and dissatisfaction. Why then is this this case? The authors explore the possibility that this may be due, at least in part, to unexpected events that trigger implicit negative associations. The results of two experiments support this hypothesis. Individuals depicted in counter-stereotypical roles activated negative evaluative responses, an effect that was most pronounced for male targets. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are considered.Read More: http://guilfordjournals.com/doi/abs/10.1521/soco.2013.31.6.712

AB - Through a combination of social change and legislative initiatives, the workplace has been transformed from a rigidly stereotypical environment (i.e., with males and females occupying distinct roles) to an arena that offers equality and opportunity for all. Regrettably, however, individuals who perform traditionally counter-stereotypical roles (e.g., male nurses, female pilots) continue to experience significant disadvantage and dissatisfaction. Why then is this this case? The authors explore the possibility that this may be due, at least in part, to unexpected events that trigger implicit negative associations. The results of two experiments support this hypothesis. Individuals depicted in counter-stereotypical roles activated negative evaluative responses, an effect that was most pronounced for male targets. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are considered.Read More: http://guilfordjournals.com/doi/abs/10.1521/soco.2013.31.6.712

U2 - 10.1521/soco.2013.31.6.712

DO - 10.1521/soco.2013.31.6.712

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 712

EP - 720

JO - Social Cognition

JF - Social Cognition

SN - 0278-016X

IS - 6

ER -