Seismic tomography and the assessment of uncertainty

Nicholas Rawlinson, Andreas Fichtner, Malcolm Sambridge, Mallory Young

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Seismic tomography is a powerful tool for illuminating Earth structure across a range of scales, but the usefulness of any image that is generated by this method is dependent on our ability to quantify its uncertainty. This uncertainty arises from the ill-posed nature of the tomographic inverse problem, which means that multiple models are capable of satisfying the data. The goal of this review is to provide an overview of the current state of the art in the assessment of uncertainty in seismic tomography, and issue a timely reminder that compared to the rapid advances made in many other areas of Earth imaging, uncertainty assessment remains underdeveloped and is often ignored or given minimal treatment in published studies. After providing a historical perspective that dates back to the pioneering work of the early 1970s, the factors that control solution nonuniqueness are discussed, which include data coverage, data noise, choice of parameterization, method used for data prediction and formulation of the inverse problem. This is followed by a description of common methods used to assess solution uncertainty and a commentary on their strengths and weaknesses. The final section of the review presents four case studies involving data sets from Australia and Europe that use different methods to assess uncertainty. The descriptive nature of this review, which does not contain detailed mathematical derivations, means that it is suitable for the many nonspecialists who make use of seismic tomography results but may not have a full appreciation of their reliability.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-76
Number of pages76
JournalAdvances in Geophysics
Volume55
Early online date20 Sep 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

seismic tomography
tomography
inverse problem
parameterization
illuminating
Earth structure
historical perspective
derivation
formulations
predictions
method
prediction

Keywords

  • seismic tomography
  • uncertainty
  • inverse problems
  • uncertainty analysis
  • wave propagation

Cite this

Rawlinson, N., Fichtner, A., Sambridge, M., & Young, M. (2014). Seismic tomography and the assessment of uncertainty. Advances in Geophysics, 55, 1-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agph.2014.08.001

Seismic tomography and the assessment of uncertainty. / Rawlinson, Nicholas; Fichtner, Andreas; Sambridge, Malcolm; Young, Mallory.

In: Advances in Geophysics, Vol. 55, 2014, p. 1-76.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rawlinson, N, Fichtner, A, Sambridge, M & Young, M 2014, 'Seismic tomography and the assessment of uncertainty', Advances in Geophysics, vol. 55, pp. 1-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agph.2014.08.001
Rawlinson, Nicholas ; Fichtner, Andreas ; Sambridge, Malcolm ; Young, Mallory. / Seismic tomography and the assessment of uncertainty. In: Advances in Geophysics. 2014 ; Vol. 55. pp. 1-76.
@article{a72889366c714d3ea726853cc502b657,
title = "Seismic tomography and the assessment of uncertainty",
abstract = "Seismic tomography is a powerful tool for illuminating Earth structure across a range of scales, but the usefulness of any image that is generated by this method is dependent on our ability to quantify its uncertainty. This uncertainty arises from the ill-posed nature of the tomographic inverse problem, which means that multiple models are capable of satisfying the data. The goal of this review is to provide an overview of the current state of the art in the assessment of uncertainty in seismic tomography, and issue a timely reminder that compared to the rapid advances made in many other areas of Earth imaging, uncertainty assessment remains underdeveloped and is often ignored or given minimal treatment in published studies. After providing a historical perspective that dates back to the pioneering work of the early 1970s, the factors that control solution nonuniqueness are discussed, which include data coverage, data noise, choice of parameterization, method used for data prediction and formulation of the inverse problem. This is followed by a description of common methods used to assess solution uncertainty and a commentary on their strengths and weaknesses. The final section of the review presents four case studies involving data sets from Australia and Europe that use different methods to assess uncertainty. The descriptive nature of this review, which does not contain detailed mathematical derivations, means that it is suitable for the many nonspecialists who make use of seismic tomography results but may not have a full appreciation of their reliability.",
keywords = "seismic tomography, uncertainty, inverse problems, uncertainty analysis, wave propagation",
author = "Nicholas Rawlinson and Andreas Fichtner and Malcolm Sambridge and Mallory Young",
note = "Advances in Geophysics Volume 55, Pages 1-122 (2014) Edited by RENATA DMOWSKA ISBN: 978-0-12-800272-8",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/bs.agph.2014.08.001",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "1--76",
journal = "Advances in Geophysics",
issn = "0065-2687",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Seismic tomography and the assessment of uncertainty

AU - Rawlinson, Nicholas

AU - Fichtner, Andreas

AU - Sambridge, Malcolm

AU - Young, Mallory

N1 - Advances in Geophysics Volume 55, Pages 1-122 (2014) Edited by RENATA DMOWSKA ISBN: 978-0-12-800272-8

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Seismic tomography is a powerful tool for illuminating Earth structure across a range of scales, but the usefulness of any image that is generated by this method is dependent on our ability to quantify its uncertainty. This uncertainty arises from the ill-posed nature of the tomographic inverse problem, which means that multiple models are capable of satisfying the data. The goal of this review is to provide an overview of the current state of the art in the assessment of uncertainty in seismic tomography, and issue a timely reminder that compared to the rapid advances made in many other areas of Earth imaging, uncertainty assessment remains underdeveloped and is often ignored or given minimal treatment in published studies. After providing a historical perspective that dates back to the pioneering work of the early 1970s, the factors that control solution nonuniqueness are discussed, which include data coverage, data noise, choice of parameterization, method used for data prediction and formulation of the inverse problem. This is followed by a description of common methods used to assess solution uncertainty and a commentary on their strengths and weaknesses. The final section of the review presents four case studies involving data sets from Australia and Europe that use different methods to assess uncertainty. The descriptive nature of this review, which does not contain detailed mathematical derivations, means that it is suitable for the many nonspecialists who make use of seismic tomography results but may not have a full appreciation of their reliability.

AB - Seismic tomography is a powerful tool for illuminating Earth structure across a range of scales, but the usefulness of any image that is generated by this method is dependent on our ability to quantify its uncertainty. This uncertainty arises from the ill-posed nature of the tomographic inverse problem, which means that multiple models are capable of satisfying the data. The goal of this review is to provide an overview of the current state of the art in the assessment of uncertainty in seismic tomography, and issue a timely reminder that compared to the rapid advances made in many other areas of Earth imaging, uncertainty assessment remains underdeveloped and is often ignored or given minimal treatment in published studies. After providing a historical perspective that dates back to the pioneering work of the early 1970s, the factors that control solution nonuniqueness are discussed, which include data coverage, data noise, choice of parameterization, method used for data prediction and formulation of the inverse problem. This is followed by a description of common methods used to assess solution uncertainty and a commentary on their strengths and weaknesses. The final section of the review presents four case studies involving data sets from Australia and Europe that use different methods to assess uncertainty. The descriptive nature of this review, which does not contain detailed mathematical derivations, means that it is suitable for the many nonspecialists who make use of seismic tomography results but may not have a full appreciation of their reliability.

KW - seismic tomography

KW - uncertainty

KW - inverse problems

KW - uncertainty analysis

KW - wave propagation

U2 - 10.1016/bs.agph.2014.08.001

DO - 10.1016/bs.agph.2014.08.001

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 1

EP - 76

JO - Advances in Geophysics

JF - Advances in Geophysics

SN - 0065-2687

ER -