Selection methods in healthcare professions

where are we now and where next?

Fiona Patterson, Jennifer Cleland, Fran Cousans

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This special issue is intended to provide a platform to present state-of-the-art research on key issues in selection and increasing diversity in medicine, and to promote further debate between colleagues across the globe. Selection into medicine continues to be highly competitive and so can be highly resource intensive, creating a practical issue for recruiters. Depending on the method and procedures used for selection, a major risk of litigation exists if these are viewed as ‘unfair’ by key stakeholders. Political considerations also influence selection practices (Anderson 2011; Patterson et al. 2012), such as an increased emphasis on widening access and promoting diversity. Selection is therefore ‘high-stakes’ from many perspectives and policy should be heavily influenced by good quality research evidence.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)229-242
Number of pages14
JournalAdvances in Health Sciences Education
Volume22
Issue number2
Early online date24 Mar 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2017

Fingerprint

profession
medicine
stakeholder
present
resources
evidence

Keywords

  • Editorial

Cite this

Selection methods in healthcare professions : where are we now and where next? / Patterson, Fiona; Cleland, Jennifer; Cousans, Fran.

In: Advances in Health Sciences Education, Vol. 22, No. 2, 05.2017, p. 229-242.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

@article{efeae3878b9d4b79981ed77e097d357a,
title = "Selection methods in healthcare professions: where are we now and where next?",
abstract = "This special issue is intended to provide a platform to present state-of-the-art research on key issues in selection and increasing diversity in medicine, and to promote further debate between colleagues across the globe. Selection into medicine continues to be highly competitive and so can be highly resource intensive, creating a practical issue for recruiters. Depending on the method and procedures used for selection, a major risk of litigation exists if these are viewed as ‘unfair’ by key stakeholders. Political considerations also influence selection practices (Anderson 2011; Patterson et al. 2012), such as an increased emphasis on widening access and promoting diversity. Selection is therefore ‘high-stakes’ from many perspectives and policy should be heavily influenced by good quality research evidence.",
keywords = "Editorial",
author = "Fiona Patterson and Jennifer Cleland and Fran Cousans",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1007/s10459-017-9752-7",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "229--242",
journal = "Advances in Health Sciences Education",
issn = "1382-4996",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Selection methods in healthcare professions

T2 - where are we now and where next?

AU - Patterson, Fiona

AU - Cleland, Jennifer

AU - Cousans, Fran

PY - 2017/5

Y1 - 2017/5

N2 - This special issue is intended to provide a platform to present state-of-the-art research on key issues in selection and increasing diversity in medicine, and to promote further debate between colleagues across the globe. Selection into medicine continues to be highly competitive and so can be highly resource intensive, creating a practical issue for recruiters. Depending on the method and procedures used for selection, a major risk of litigation exists if these are viewed as ‘unfair’ by key stakeholders. Political considerations also influence selection practices (Anderson 2011; Patterson et al. 2012), such as an increased emphasis on widening access and promoting diversity. Selection is therefore ‘high-stakes’ from many perspectives and policy should be heavily influenced by good quality research evidence.

AB - This special issue is intended to provide a platform to present state-of-the-art research on key issues in selection and increasing diversity in medicine, and to promote further debate between colleagues across the globe. Selection into medicine continues to be highly competitive and so can be highly resource intensive, creating a practical issue for recruiters. Depending on the method and procedures used for selection, a major risk of litigation exists if these are viewed as ‘unfair’ by key stakeholders. Political considerations also influence selection practices (Anderson 2011; Patterson et al. 2012), such as an increased emphasis on widening access and promoting diversity. Selection is therefore ‘high-stakes’ from many perspectives and policy should be heavily influenced by good quality research evidence.

KW - Editorial

U2 - 10.1007/s10459-017-9752-7

DO - 10.1007/s10459-017-9752-7

M3 - Editorial

VL - 22

SP - 229

EP - 242

JO - Advances in Health Sciences Education

JF - Advances in Health Sciences Education

SN - 1382-4996

IS - 2

ER -