Abstract
Self-discrepancy theory [E. T. Higgins, 1987] proposes that discrepancies between self and 'ideal' standards are associated with dejection-related emotions, whereas discrepancies between self and 'ought' standards are associated with agitation-related emotions. Although there is substantial evidence to support the ideal/ought distinction, the traditional method used to measure self-discrepancies contains some theoretical and conceptual limitations. This paper discusses these limitations, presents a critique of other methods of measuring self-discrepancies and suggests a new measurement technique, the Self-Lines measure. This new approach is consistent with the theoretical underpinning of self-discrepancy theory. A pilot study suggests that this approach is feasible and two comparative studies demonstrate the validity and advantages of the Self-Lines measure.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 69-84 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Cognitive Therapy and Research |
Volume | 30 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Feb 2006 |
Keywords
- self-discrepancy
- idiographic measurement
- assessment
- self
- emotion
- regulatory focus
- goal attainment
- depression
- anxiety
- model