Self-lines: A new, psychometrically sound, 'user-friendly' idiographic technique for assessing self-discrepancies

Jillian Joy Francis, Jennifer M. Boldero, Natalie L. Sambell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Self-discrepancy theory [E. T. Higgins, 1987] proposes that discrepancies between self and 'ideal' standards are associated with dejection-related emotions, whereas discrepancies between self and 'ought' standards are associated with agitation-related emotions. Although there is substantial evidence to support the ideal/ought distinction, the traditional method used to measure self-discrepancies contains some theoretical and conceptual limitations. This paper discusses these limitations, presents a critique of other methods of measuring self-discrepancies and suggests a new measurement technique, the Self-Lines measure. This new approach is consistent with the theoretical underpinning of self-discrepancy theory. A pilot study suggests that this approach is feasible and two comparative studies demonstrate the validity and advantages of the Self-Lines measure.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)69-84
Number of pages16
JournalCognitive Therapy and Research
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2006

Keywords

  • self-discrepancy
  • idiographic measurement
  • assessment
  • self
  • emotion
  • regulatory focus
  • goal attainment
  • depression
  • anxiety
  • model

Cite this

Self-lines : A new, psychometrically sound, 'user-friendly' idiographic technique for assessing self-discrepancies. / Francis, Jillian Joy; Boldero, Jennifer M.; Sambell, Natalie L.

In: Cognitive Therapy and Research, Vol. 30, No. 1, 02.2006, p. 69-84.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Francis, Jillian Joy ; Boldero, Jennifer M. ; Sambell, Natalie L. / Self-lines : A new, psychometrically sound, 'user-friendly' idiographic technique for assessing self-discrepancies. In: Cognitive Therapy and Research. 2006 ; Vol. 30, No. 1. pp. 69-84.
@article{ddc63d83c4ec454bade5349f36386588,
title = "Self-lines: A new, psychometrically sound, 'user-friendly' idiographic technique for assessing self-discrepancies",
abstract = "Self-discrepancy theory [E. T. Higgins, 1987] proposes that discrepancies between self and 'ideal' standards are associated with dejection-related emotions, whereas discrepancies between self and 'ought' standards are associated with agitation-related emotions. Although there is substantial evidence to support the ideal/ought distinction, the traditional method used to measure self-discrepancies contains some theoretical and conceptual limitations. This paper discusses these limitations, presents a critique of other methods of measuring self-discrepancies and suggests a new measurement technique, the Self-Lines measure. This new approach is consistent with the theoretical underpinning of self-discrepancy theory. A pilot study suggests that this approach is feasible and two comparative studies demonstrate the validity and advantages of the Self-Lines measure.",
keywords = "self-discrepancy, idiographic measurement, assessment, self, emotion, regulatory focus, goal attainment, depression, anxiety, model",
author = "Francis, {Jillian Joy} and Boldero, {Jennifer M.} and Sambell, {Natalie L.}",
year = "2006",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1007/s10608-006-9009-x",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "69--84",
journal = "Cognitive Therapy and Research",
issn = "0147-5916",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Self-lines

T2 - A new, psychometrically sound, 'user-friendly' idiographic technique for assessing self-discrepancies

AU - Francis, Jillian Joy

AU - Boldero, Jennifer M.

AU - Sambell, Natalie L.

PY - 2006/2

Y1 - 2006/2

N2 - Self-discrepancy theory [E. T. Higgins, 1987] proposes that discrepancies between self and 'ideal' standards are associated with dejection-related emotions, whereas discrepancies between self and 'ought' standards are associated with agitation-related emotions. Although there is substantial evidence to support the ideal/ought distinction, the traditional method used to measure self-discrepancies contains some theoretical and conceptual limitations. This paper discusses these limitations, presents a critique of other methods of measuring self-discrepancies and suggests a new measurement technique, the Self-Lines measure. This new approach is consistent with the theoretical underpinning of self-discrepancy theory. A pilot study suggests that this approach is feasible and two comparative studies demonstrate the validity and advantages of the Self-Lines measure.

AB - Self-discrepancy theory [E. T. Higgins, 1987] proposes that discrepancies between self and 'ideal' standards are associated with dejection-related emotions, whereas discrepancies between self and 'ought' standards are associated with agitation-related emotions. Although there is substantial evidence to support the ideal/ought distinction, the traditional method used to measure self-discrepancies contains some theoretical and conceptual limitations. This paper discusses these limitations, presents a critique of other methods of measuring self-discrepancies and suggests a new measurement technique, the Self-Lines measure. This new approach is consistent with the theoretical underpinning of self-discrepancy theory. A pilot study suggests that this approach is feasible and two comparative studies demonstrate the validity and advantages of the Self-Lines measure.

KW - self-discrepancy

KW - idiographic measurement

KW - assessment

KW - self

KW - emotion

KW - regulatory focus

KW - goal attainment

KW - depression

KW - anxiety

KW - model

U2 - 10.1007/s10608-006-9009-x

DO - 10.1007/s10608-006-9009-x

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 69

EP - 84

JO - Cognitive Therapy and Research

JF - Cognitive Therapy and Research

SN - 0147-5916

IS - 1

ER -