Self-Prioritization During Stimulus Processing is Not Obligatory

Siobhan Caughey* (Corresponding Author), Johanna Katariina Falben, Dimitra Tsamadi, Linn M Persson, Marius Golubickis, C. Neil Macrae

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

An emerging literature has suggested that self-relevance automatically enhances stimulus processing (i.e., the self-prioritization effect). Specifically, during shape-label matching tasks, geometric shapes associated with the self are identified more rapidly than comparable stimuli paired with other targets (e.g., friend, stranger). Replicating and extending work that challenges the putative automaticity of this effect, here we hypothesized that self-relevance facilitates stimulus processing only when task sets draw attention to previously formed shape-label associations in memory. The results of a shape-classification task confirmed this prediction. Compared to shapes associated with a friend, those paired with the self were classified more rapidly when participants were required to report who the stimulus denoted (i.e., self or friend). In contrast, self-relevance failed to facilitate performance when participants judged either what the shape was (i.e., triangle or square, diamond or circle) or where it was located on the screen (i.e., above or below fixation). These findings further elucidate the conditions under which self-relevance does — and does not — influence stimulus processing.
Original languageEnglish
JournalPsychological Research
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 21 Dec 2019

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • self-prioritization
  • self-relevance
  • automaticity
  • perceptual matching
  • task sets

Cite this

Caughey, S., Falben, J. K., Tsamadi, D., Persson, L. M., Golubickis, M., & Macrae, C. N. (Accepted/In press). Self-Prioritization During Stimulus Processing is Not Obligatory. Psychological Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01283-2