Self-Prioritization During Stimulus Processing is Not Obligatory

Siobhan Caughey* (Corresponding Author), Johanna Katariina Falben, Dimitra Tsamadi, Linn M Persson, Marius Golubickis, C. Neil Macrae

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

An emerging literature has suggested that self-relevance automatically enhances stimulus processing (i.e., the self-prioritization effect). Specifically, during shape-label matching tasks, geometric shapes associated with the self are identified more rapidly than comparable stimuli paired with other targets (e.g., friend, stranger). Replicating and extending work that challenges the putative automaticity of this effect, here we hypothesized that self-relevance facilitates stimulus processing only when task sets draw attention to previously formed shape-label associations in memory. The results of a shape-classification task confirmed this prediction. Compared to shapes associated with a friend, those paired with the self were classified more rapidly when participants were required to report who the stimulus denoted (i.e., self or friend). In contrast, self-relevance failed to facilitate performance when participants judged either what the shape was (i.e., triangle or square, diamond or circle) or where it was located on the screen (i.e., above or below fixation). These findings further elucidate the conditions under which self-relevance does — and does not — influence stimulus processing.
Original languageEnglish
JournalPsychological Research
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 21 Dec 2019

Fingerprint

Diamond
Stimulus
Automaticity
Triangle
Stranger
Fixation
Prediction

Keywords

  • self-prioritization
  • self-relevance
  • automaticity
  • perceptual matching
  • task sets

Cite this

Caughey, S., Falben, J. K., Tsamadi, D., Persson, L. M., Golubickis, M., & Macrae, C. N. (Accepted/In press). Self-Prioritization During Stimulus Processing is Not Obligatory. Psychological Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01283-2

Self-Prioritization During Stimulus Processing is Not Obligatory. / Caughey, Siobhan (Corresponding Author); Falben, Johanna Katariina; Tsamadi, Dimitra; Persson, Linn M; Golubickis, Marius; Macrae, C. Neil.

In: Psychological Research, 21.12.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Caughey, Siobhan ; Falben, Johanna Katariina ; Tsamadi, Dimitra ; Persson, Linn M ; Golubickis, Marius ; Macrae, C. Neil. / Self-Prioritization During Stimulus Processing is Not Obligatory. In: Psychological Research. 2019.
@article{5e460fd386484d178d00390130ecff5b,
title = "Self-Prioritization During Stimulus Processing is Not Obligatory",
abstract = "An emerging literature has suggested that self-relevance automatically enhances stimulus processing (i.e., the self-prioritization effect). Specifically, during shape-label matching tasks, geometric shapes associated with the self are identified more rapidly than comparable stimuli paired with other targets (e.g., friend, stranger). Replicating and extending work that challenges the putative automaticity of this effect, here we hypothesized that self-relevance facilitates stimulus processing only when task sets draw attention to previously formed shape-label associations in memory. The results of a shape-classification task confirmed this prediction. Compared to shapes associated with a friend, those paired with the self were classified more rapidly when participants were required to report who the stimulus denoted (i.e., self or friend). In contrast, self-relevance failed to facilitate performance when participants judged either what the shape was (i.e., triangle or square, diamond or circle) or where it was located on the screen (i.e., above or below fixation). These findings further elucidate the conditions under which self-relevance does — and does not — influence stimulus processing.",
keywords = "self-prioritization, self-relevance, automaticity, perceptual matching, task sets",
author = "Siobhan Caughey and Falben, {Johanna Katariina} and Dimitra Tsamadi and Persson, {Linn M} and Marius Golubickis and Macrae, {C. Neil}",
note = "Open access via the Springer Compact Agreement",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1007/s00426-019-01283-2",
language = "English",
journal = "Psychological Research",
issn = "0340-0727",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Self-Prioritization During Stimulus Processing is Not Obligatory

AU - Caughey, Siobhan

AU - Falben, Johanna Katariina

AU - Tsamadi, Dimitra

AU - Persson, Linn M

AU - Golubickis, Marius

AU - Macrae, C. Neil

N1 - Open access via the Springer Compact Agreement

PY - 2019/12/21

Y1 - 2019/12/21

N2 - An emerging literature has suggested that self-relevance automatically enhances stimulus processing (i.e., the self-prioritization effect). Specifically, during shape-label matching tasks, geometric shapes associated with the self are identified more rapidly than comparable stimuli paired with other targets (e.g., friend, stranger). Replicating and extending work that challenges the putative automaticity of this effect, here we hypothesized that self-relevance facilitates stimulus processing only when task sets draw attention to previously formed shape-label associations in memory. The results of a shape-classification task confirmed this prediction. Compared to shapes associated with a friend, those paired with the self were classified more rapidly when participants were required to report who the stimulus denoted (i.e., self or friend). In contrast, self-relevance failed to facilitate performance when participants judged either what the shape was (i.e., triangle or square, diamond or circle) or where it was located on the screen (i.e., above or below fixation). These findings further elucidate the conditions under which self-relevance does — and does not — influence stimulus processing.

AB - An emerging literature has suggested that self-relevance automatically enhances stimulus processing (i.e., the self-prioritization effect). Specifically, during shape-label matching tasks, geometric shapes associated with the self are identified more rapidly than comparable stimuli paired with other targets (e.g., friend, stranger). Replicating and extending work that challenges the putative automaticity of this effect, here we hypothesized that self-relevance facilitates stimulus processing only when task sets draw attention to previously formed shape-label associations in memory. The results of a shape-classification task confirmed this prediction. Compared to shapes associated with a friend, those paired with the self were classified more rapidly when participants were required to report who the stimulus denoted (i.e., self or friend). In contrast, self-relevance failed to facilitate performance when participants judged either what the shape was (i.e., triangle or square, diamond or circle) or where it was located on the screen (i.e., above or below fixation). These findings further elucidate the conditions under which self-relevance does — and does not — influence stimulus processing.

KW - self-prioritization

KW - self-relevance

KW - automaticity

KW - perceptual matching

KW - task sets

U2 - 10.1007/s00426-019-01283-2

DO - 10.1007/s00426-019-01283-2

M3 - Article

JO - Psychological Research

JF - Psychological Research

SN - 0340-0727

ER -