Self-regulation and risk-taking

Emily C. E. Magar, Louise H. Phillips, Judith A. Hosie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

88 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The link between individual personality traits and risk-taking propensity is well documented. Recent theories suggest that one particular trait, individual differences in self-regulatory control, might also explain engagement in risky activities, with poor self-regulatory competence increasing the likelihood of risk participation (Byrnes, 1998, 2005; Steinberg, 2004, 2005). In the current study, 134 undergraduate students (45 males, 89 females; mean age 20.87 years) completed self-report measures of emotion regulation (Emotion Regulation Questionnaire), cognitive regulation (Dysexecutive Questionnaire), and risk-taking (Smoking & Drinking Survey, Youth Decision-Making Questionnaire, Benthin Risk Perception Measure). Poor cognitive self-regulation, or executive function, was linked to greater endorsement of risky activities portrayed in hypothetical vignettes (e.g. joy riding, shoplifting), an over-emphasis of the benefits associated with risky activities, and a higher incidence of problems associated with excessive alcohol consumption. In contrast, poor styles of emotion regulation predicted greater participation in risky behaviours such as cigarette smoking, as well as alcohol induced problem behaviours such as fighting and arguing. Assessment of cognitive and emotional regulation may improve understanding of the causes of risky behaviours. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)153-159
Number of pages7
JournalPersonality and Individual Differences
Volume45
Issue number2
Early online date6 May 2008
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2008

Keywords

  • emotion regulation
  • cognitive regulation
  • executive function
  • self-regulation
  • risk-taking
  • risky behaviours
  • individual differences
  • sensation-seeking
  • decision-making
  • individual-differences
  • adolescent brain
  • personality
  • behavior
  • scale
  • psychopathology
  • consequences

Cite this

Self-regulation and risk-taking. / Magar, Emily C. E.; Phillips, Louise H.; Hosie, Judith A.

In: Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 45, No. 2, 07.2008, p. 153-159.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Magar, Emily C. E. ; Phillips, Louise H. ; Hosie, Judith A. / Self-regulation and risk-taking. In: Personality and Individual Differences. 2008 ; Vol. 45, No. 2. pp. 153-159.
@article{2fdd1b2b2b6e40d994202c893ec934ea,
title = "Self-regulation and risk-taking",
abstract = "The link between individual personality traits and risk-taking propensity is well documented. Recent theories suggest that one particular trait, individual differences in self-regulatory control, might also explain engagement in risky activities, with poor self-regulatory competence increasing the likelihood of risk participation (Byrnes, 1998, 2005; Steinberg, 2004, 2005). In the current study, 134 undergraduate students (45 males, 89 females; mean age 20.87 years) completed self-report measures of emotion regulation (Emotion Regulation Questionnaire), cognitive regulation (Dysexecutive Questionnaire), and risk-taking (Smoking & Drinking Survey, Youth Decision-Making Questionnaire, Benthin Risk Perception Measure). Poor cognitive self-regulation, or executive function, was linked to greater endorsement of risky activities portrayed in hypothetical vignettes (e.g. joy riding, shoplifting), an over-emphasis of the benefits associated with risky activities, and a higher incidence of problems associated with excessive alcohol consumption. In contrast, poor styles of emotion regulation predicted greater participation in risky behaviours such as cigarette smoking, as well as alcohol induced problem behaviours such as fighting and arguing. Assessment of cognitive and emotional regulation may improve understanding of the causes of risky behaviours. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "emotion regulation, cognitive regulation, executive function, self-regulation, risk-taking, risky behaviours, individual differences, sensation-seeking, decision-making, individual-differences, adolescent brain, personality, behavior, scale, psychopathology, consequences",
author = "Magar, {Emily C. E.} and Phillips, {Louise H.} and Hosie, {Judith A.}",
year = "2008",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.paid.2008.03.014",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "153--159",
journal = "Personality and Individual Differences",
issn = "0191-8869",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Self-regulation and risk-taking

AU - Magar, Emily C. E.

AU - Phillips, Louise H.

AU - Hosie, Judith A.

PY - 2008/7

Y1 - 2008/7

N2 - The link between individual personality traits and risk-taking propensity is well documented. Recent theories suggest that one particular trait, individual differences in self-regulatory control, might also explain engagement in risky activities, with poor self-regulatory competence increasing the likelihood of risk participation (Byrnes, 1998, 2005; Steinberg, 2004, 2005). In the current study, 134 undergraduate students (45 males, 89 females; mean age 20.87 years) completed self-report measures of emotion regulation (Emotion Regulation Questionnaire), cognitive regulation (Dysexecutive Questionnaire), and risk-taking (Smoking & Drinking Survey, Youth Decision-Making Questionnaire, Benthin Risk Perception Measure). Poor cognitive self-regulation, or executive function, was linked to greater endorsement of risky activities portrayed in hypothetical vignettes (e.g. joy riding, shoplifting), an over-emphasis of the benefits associated with risky activities, and a higher incidence of problems associated with excessive alcohol consumption. In contrast, poor styles of emotion regulation predicted greater participation in risky behaviours such as cigarette smoking, as well as alcohol induced problem behaviours such as fighting and arguing. Assessment of cognitive and emotional regulation may improve understanding of the causes of risky behaviours. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

AB - The link between individual personality traits and risk-taking propensity is well documented. Recent theories suggest that one particular trait, individual differences in self-regulatory control, might also explain engagement in risky activities, with poor self-regulatory competence increasing the likelihood of risk participation (Byrnes, 1998, 2005; Steinberg, 2004, 2005). In the current study, 134 undergraduate students (45 males, 89 females; mean age 20.87 years) completed self-report measures of emotion regulation (Emotion Regulation Questionnaire), cognitive regulation (Dysexecutive Questionnaire), and risk-taking (Smoking & Drinking Survey, Youth Decision-Making Questionnaire, Benthin Risk Perception Measure). Poor cognitive self-regulation, or executive function, was linked to greater endorsement of risky activities portrayed in hypothetical vignettes (e.g. joy riding, shoplifting), an over-emphasis of the benefits associated with risky activities, and a higher incidence of problems associated with excessive alcohol consumption. In contrast, poor styles of emotion regulation predicted greater participation in risky behaviours such as cigarette smoking, as well as alcohol induced problem behaviours such as fighting and arguing. Assessment of cognitive and emotional regulation may improve understanding of the causes of risky behaviours. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

KW - emotion regulation

KW - cognitive regulation

KW - executive function

KW - self-regulation

KW - risk-taking

KW - risky behaviours

KW - individual differences

KW - sensation-seeking

KW - decision-making

KW - individual-differences

KW - adolescent brain

KW - personality

KW - behavior

KW - scale

KW - psychopathology

KW - consequences

U2 - 10.1016/j.paid.2008.03.014

DO - 10.1016/j.paid.2008.03.014

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 153

EP - 159

JO - Personality and Individual Differences

JF - Personality and Individual Differences

SN - 0191-8869

IS - 2

ER -